science. dumb it down for me. i want to know what does the evidence show relative to her having been hacked? >> yes. so the evidence that we can find in the web archives do not support her version of events. so there are several posts in question, and i won't go over all of the posts, but i've read the letters that her lawyer sent to both google and the internet archive, and for one example that we can discuss in detail, there was a post from 2006, january 11th, and in that post, there are two posts that her lawyers argue that she did not write. so, there are copies of that post in the internet archive which have since been redacted using something called a robot exclusion protocol from her camp. but the key issue is a copy of