>> that's fine and that's why you're here answering questions. i appreciate that with the both. you and i had a conversation about this a few months ago, this was mr. strzok's issue, i asked at the time did he have his security clearance. you said you would check, it appears that he had it. it appears the security clearance has been revoked. the concern i have is process inside the department of justice when you have someone of his counterintelligence level, this is not a new recruit. this is somebody who's been around, who's had sensitive information. on january 13th, 2016, an individual from the fbi's washington field office e-mailed mr. strzok and other employees that their polygraphs were out of -- i think it was out of scope. i asked you about that. and i asked if he had been polygraphed, you didn't know at the time. it said the polygraph raised flags. now, my question about this would be -- you didn't know about the polygraph at the time, we'll assume now that it is out there, you do. would the topic of the extramarital affair have come up in the polygraph, or possibility