in front of these two particular house subcommittees. from our experience with the committee thus far, it is obvious that they don't want the truth. they don't want to hear what pete has to say. >> this calls in to question whether this controversial figure, strzok, is going to actually appear again in front of the house judiciary committee. he did already appear for 11 hours behind closed doors toance lawmakers answer lawmakers' questions. let's dig in deeper with a cnn legal analyst, as well as a cnn national security analyst. going back for a minute to the senate intel here and what we are learning from the senate intelligence committee in terms of these findings. they did point out here the committee heard consistently that analysts were under no politically motivated pressure to reach any conclusions. all analysts expressed they object to content levels as is normal and proper for the analytic process. is there anything we should read into that? >> i think they're pointing out that the ica, or intelligence