> instead of should have been, i don't see any reason w"> > instead of should have been, i don't see any reason w" property="og:description"> > instead of should have been, i don't see any reason w">
would/wouldn't flip on russian interference got nostalgic treatment last night on the "late show." >> instead of should have been, i don't see any reason why it wouldn't be russia. sort of a double negative. >> your favorite schoolhouse, schoolhouse rock! ♪ double negative, what's your function ♪ ♪ a desperate way to not side with the russians ♪ ♪ double negative, how's that function notice confusing the people with sentence construction ♪ ♪ the president isn't in putin's pock ticket snot, the president wasn't owned by kim jong-un, not, how about the president isn't trustworthy. well, let's let that one stand. >> oh, my god! that is clever. >> think of how much money you