are in iraq to fight isis where they're outnumbered three to one based on the recent pentagon estimates. you said that is an unaccept abe misuse and pollicization of our troops. >> we already have a border control there and already national guards men there. we're talking about a group of, what, three, four thousand individuals that best we know are unarmed. they are still weeks, if not months away from the american border, if, in fact, they ever get there. why would we need to send thousands of heavily arm eed soldiers when we have capable individuals on the border. we are not facing an invasion, even though that's the word that's been used. out of principal, i almost never talk about what motivates people because you never quite know. but in this case, there is no plausible argument that we need american troops.