question. his administration has already tipped their hand about what their explanation was and the supreme court didn't buy it. >> yeah, but these are two different legal regimes. when the secretary of commerce did what it did, it did it pursuant to the census act so congress gave the secretary authority to implement the census. there's another statute called the administrative procedure act that sort of is oversight when agencies do things. this is taking it out of that process and saying i'm president, article 2 of the constitution gives me the authority as the executor of laws and i'm going to do it by the stroke of a pen. that's squishier. the supreme court in certain circumstances, famously with president truman in the steel seizure case in the 1950s has said that there are limits on the execution of executive power. that can be unconstitutional. but this is a really gray area. i think it's possible justice roberts could jump from the minority to the majority in this instance if there were time, but i also think it's a real problem for the separation of powers because it's an end run not just