why it wasn't answered or what surrounded it being commissioned in the first place. but i will say that report did identify evidence of corrosion, deterioration. by itself, the conclusions didn't kind of scream out danger or imminent collapse. it did indicate repairs should have been made. a lot of those repairs, the patching of spalled concrete, it will prevent further chlorides getting into the steel and kind of accelerating the corrosion that needs to be arrested. >> whose responsibility, troy, would it have been to address it? clearly these are serious issues. >> i imagine that the building owners would have commissioned the evaluation and, you know, reading the details of the report, i would expect them to reach out to the engineers who produced the report, talk about what the implications are, and how urgent those repairs would have been. if they were cosmetic or could have been done over the long term, you know, that would have been communicated. but if there was a sense of