thinks she got it a little wrong then and it's more difficult to inquire into a justice's points of view to discern how they might rule on issues. she doesn't think it's quite as good an idea now to do that. i frankly happen to agree with her. for example, on the commerce clause, kiinquire and probably will about general views on the commerce clause. but she's going to be very careful. given the fact that this case might come before her on commerce clause grounds, the citizens united case, for example. she will be careful to not give any clues as to how she might decide that case. and she shouldn't. she doesn't have all the facts and hasn't researched the law. so it's unfair to ask a prospective justice how they might rule. and it's somewhat unfair to ask the questions that get up to that point and don't ask the final question: so how would you rule? it's a very difficult proposition. >> greta: are you not curious,