even when no threat of attack is immediately present. that doesn't make sense. the target must have recently been involved in activities. they don't define recently, don't define activities, sounds like they can pick and choose, you know, judge, jury, executioner here. am i reading too much into that? is that too much power? >> i think you're ready exactly wys, it's very, very clear and i think the last point you just made is the point that all americans should be concerned about. this gives the president the administration, one branch of government, way too much authority. what we need in this process and what we fought continually with in the bush administration as they went through the process, make sure that the administration as they carried out enhanced interrogation techniques, as they carried out a drone program, to make sure that there were rigorous, enforceable standards that were measurable and make sure that another branch of government, in this case the intelligence committees of the house and senate would have access to review and provide