admissible? >> it's history that has this type of ruling in the past. gang tattoos are allowed inside there is already this legal president as exists. in this case, the tattoos were after the killings. >> the timing is critically important. it's extremely important. it's not this. it's much more than any prejudice because of the fact that these tattoos were done after the killing. >> put your defense hat on. the defense argued to the judge that it's speculative. tattoos can have a variety of meeting. the judge did not buy it and he rejected the claim admissible. the judge make the right decision? >> i don't. i think the judge made the mistake and the prosecutor made
Related Keywords
History , Ruling , Shots , Type , Gang Tattoos , Admissible , Five , Case , President , Tattoos , Timing , Killings , Judge , Fact , Defense , Killing , Defense Hat , Prejudice , Variety , Meeting , Claim , Prosecutor , Mistake , I Don T , Decision ,
vimarsana.com © 2020. All Rights Reserved.