oppenheim says the farrow story was "not the story we were looking at when we made our judgment." yet another lie. as farrow told rachel maddow, he finished the bulk of his reporting when he went to the "the new yorker." that is why the magazine accepted his piece in the first place. >> why did you end up reporting this story for the "the new yorker" and not for nbc news? >> you would have to ask nbc and nbc executives about the details of that story. i'm not going to comment on any news organization's story that they did or didn't run. >> nbc says that the story wasn't publishable, that it wasn't ready to go by the time that you brought it to them. obviously it was ready to go by the time you got it into "the new yorker." >> i walked into the door at "the new yorker" with an explosively reportable piece that should have been public earlier, and immediately, obviously, "the new yorker" recognized that, and it is not accurate to say it was not reportable. in fact, there were multiple determinations that it was reportable at nbc. >> tucker: we'd bet money that her employer didn't want rachel
Related Keywords
Noah Oppenheim , Story , Ronan Farrow , Reporting , Piece , New Yorker , Judgment , Lie , Bulk , Magazine , Rachel Maddow , Wasn Ta Story , Nbc News , Place , Wasnt Publishable , Killera Blockbustr , Details , Executives , Didnt Run , Wasnt Ready To Go , Door , Watch Tucker , Fact , Money , Didn T , Employer , Determinations ,
vimarsana.com © 2020. All Rights Reserved.