it's actually speculative. she is purporting to explain, as hillary has tried to do, why hillary lost. and she's revealing that she is making assumptions about half the people who will be appearing before her bench in the court. in that sense, or speculations, as thee lawyers like to say, hae no probative value. she's a judge and she should know better than to concoct evidence based on her own assumptions. i think this is terrible. you know, i loathe the rule judges which alas, this great republic has dwindled down to. but people accept because they think they are a kind of super legislator, nine robed regents who are above the law. who are above politics. if these nine robed regions start purporting to know the minds of 100 million voters, i