Stay updated with breaking news from Hillary lost. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
but then we would have stayed together. it could be wrong. >> let's talk about adam schiff, judge. what's going on over there? >> adam schiff. all right, adam schiff -- he's a total liar. i'm just -- i'm like overwhelmed by all of this. look, we had the weaponization of all kinds of institutions in our government being used against people who are innocent, who are not guilty of anything. so hillary clinton writes a book. the russians were the reason i lost. jim comey, my husband, the women who didn't listen to their husbands, on and on. you get twitter who decides, okay, she's right. get rid of the russians or let the people think the russians were on to -- on to -- on twitter and what we're going to do is make sure that people hate all of the russians and understand why hillary lost.
washington. hillary lost. why russia? hunter biden's laptop is here. russia. and so on and so on. so over time probably inevitably the inflated threat of russia became a pretext for everything bad, including censorship in this country. it's russian disinformation. shut it down. thanks to new reporting from matt taibbi we know the federal government's intelligence and law enforcement agencies enthusiastically joined the effort to censor the political speech of american citizens illegally. it was a sophisticated effort. at one point, for example, the state department released a report falsely claiming that thousands of twitter accounts were controlled by foreign governments. russia. and then unnamed sources in the intel world leaked scary headlines about russian disinformation running rampant on twitter. twitter deleted data pertinent
2016, the government transparency organization wikileaks released thousands of emails from the servers of the democratic national committee. those documents showed conclusively that hillary clinton partisans had worked to rig the democratic primary against her rival bernie sanders. it was obvious from the start that that email dump had come from an internal source, probably from a dnc staffer offended by the corruption of the clinton team. of course the democratic party couldn't admit. too embarrassing, too revealing. so instead in order to cover this wrongdoing, the clinton campaign claimed the russians hacked the servers. remember that? you may have believed it or not, but intel agencies in this country must have known at the time that it was not true. they would know, but they said nothing. they said nothing because blaming russia turned out to be a useful political tool. in fact, before long, it became the default response to every perceived disaster in washington. hillary lost.
so i wanted to make sure i got that out there. >> well, he did. he definitely got that out there. but why no money for the ryan campaign from the dems? >> tim is a very effective communicator. he's got a good opponent. he's able to define this, like, this is what you want to do in a debate, the moment you define your opponent at his biggest vulnerability. he's a frud. bad inflation numbers, you can say, hey, i'm going to fight for you, you can't count on them to fight for you. the problem for ryan is he is at a financial disadvantage. he doesn't have quite the money that j.d. has. j.d. has money from peter field, from mitch mcconnell, and i think the democrats just don't believe in ohio. we've had hillary lost by eight points, biden lost that state by eight points, but -- >> the other sitting senator. >> that's sharon brown. >> i'm not good at politics. is sharon progressive? >> she is a progressive, joe,
of fraud. that's the spin on the misinformation. >> they're all lies. >> okay, i will tell you today antido antidotally today while i was on my show, i got the same analogy and this was somebody sending me an article telling me of trump and all other things. there is always going to be a segment of people that don't believe it. you are a football fan like i am and different teams who are fans. when your team you feel it's hosed on a call. you are going to hang your hat on that if you don't want to believe your team lost. years ago when hillary lost, the democrats were shocked that there were any way legally or justifiably that she could lose to trump. i would tell you here in arizona ant
of fraud. and so that is the discrepancdi the spin on the misinformation. >> those are all lies. >> okay. i will tell you that today anecdotely, today while i was on my show, i got a facebook message from someone. and i brought up the same analogy i gave you. this was somebody that was sending me articles and youtube videos that was telling me just how there was russian collusion with trump and all the other things. what i'm saying is there is always going to be a segment of people that don't believe it. you are probably a football fan like i am, probably different teams, but we're fans. when your team you feel like gets hosed on a call, you hang your hat on that if you don't want to believe your team lost a game. in this case, i think that's a lot of what happened. years ago when hillary lost, the democrats were shocked that there was any way legally or justifiably she could lose to trump. and i will tell you that here in arizona, anecdotely of watching the support he had, there were a
benefiting from a similar situation and it could come back to haunt him? we haven't heard any democrats really talk about all the stuff that trump and this ukraine scandal is about. burisma, hunter, his brother jimmy. i mean there is stuff. his entire track record as a senator for decades. >> he has gotten attacked on the criminal justice issues. >> sure, a little bit, yeah. >> i would also argue that hillary got beat up pretty bad in 2008. >> but not in '16 i mean. >> i know. but i think a lot of the stuff about her had come out. maybe if she had gotten -- let's not go back there, about why hillary lost. but i just think this is a bad argument for bloomberg to be making because even bringing up he has never run a school system, the president doesn't run school systems. that's not the president does. he doesn't even really run the government, right? he is the visionary or she some day hopefully is the visionary and sets doesn't set the policy
hampshire could be devastating for them. as well as warn's campaign, they have quite an impressive ground game and that can really make a difference in smaller states like iowa and new hampshire. >> and you're going into super tuesday and you have really expensive states the republican advantage, the mega advantage that republicans have in fund raising not only with what they brought in in this quarter but in the digital space over any of these democrats as the democrats keep going at each other and the rnc is raising a ton of money. >> this is really a lesson for the dnc that rethey did not start rebuilding after 2016 when obama left and hillary lost. the rnc has record setting resources and they have this ground game, this data driven ground game they have been perfecting since 2012. yes bernie sanders, all of these people, they're raising impressive sums of money but the
>> is that who democrats should be focusing on, voters who maybe were obama voters and then were trump voters? >> no. >> can you peel them away or should they focus on new voters? >> yes. i think what we need to do is figure out who didn't come out in '16. hillary lost by two votes for precinct, that's it. what happened in flint and detroit, large numbers of young people and african-americans just didn't bother to vote. or there was 89,000 people that voted in michigan, voted for everybody down ballot, mostly democrats, and left the top box blank. that's how much they didn't want to vote for hillary clinton. we can't let this happen this time. we have to have people on the ballot, men and women, who are going to bring out that vote. 70% of the electorate next year is either 18 to 35, people of color, or women. and that is the base of the democratic party. let me also add this.
resonate in michigan, wisconsin -- >> bernie. >> and ohio? >> bernie won michigan and wisconsin and minnesota. bernie won all those primaries. >> is that who democrats should be focusing on, voters who maybe were obama voters and then were trump voters? >> no. >> can you peel them away or should they focus on new voters? >> yes. i think what we need to do is figure out who didn't come out in '16. hillary lost by two votes for precinct, that's it. what happened in flint and detroit, large numbers of young people and african-americans