describes his reaction to the 2016 when and i m guessing it was not this. that is every brother-in-law. he questions himself and america and says what if we were wrong and maybe we pushed too far and maybe people want to fall back into their tribe. the book is written by one of his loyal lackeys, ben rhodes. hbo caught him on the night that hillary lost i can t i mean, i can t i can t, i can t, i can t put it into
To the 2016 when and i m guessing it was not this. that is every brother-in-law. he questions himself and america and says what if we were wrong and maybe we pushed too far and maybe people want to fall back into their tribe. the book is written by one of his loyal lackeys, ben rhodes. hbo caught him on the night that hillary lost i can t i mean, i can t i can t, i can t, i can t put it into words. greg: i can watch that forever.
To the 2016 when and i m guessing it was not this. that is every brother-in-law. he questions himself and america and says what if we were wrong and maybe we pushed too far and maybe people want to fall back into their tribe. the book is written by one of his loyal lackeys, ben rhodes. hbo caught him on the night that hillary lost i can t i mean, i can t i can t, i can t, i can t put it into
You wrote in the back it felt damn good to bass next girl power when she got the nomination. then you say when you wrote your last story after the election, you finally cried. did you feel compromised as a reporter covering this candidate who you passionately believed in. i cried because i was absolutely exhausted. i make clear it s not because hillary lost. if you read the book you know there was an incredibly contentious relationship between hillary clinton and the press and my position as the lead beat reporter. she called the political press big egos and no brains. i think that tension carried over and spilled over into that u.n. press conference where she had to address the private email server for the first time. howie: you say the email scandal
Hillary. you wrote in the back it felt damn good to bass next girl power when she got the nomination. then you say when you wrote your last story after the election, you finally cried. did you feel compromised as a reporter covering this candidate who you passionately believed in. i cried because i was absolutely exhausted. i make clear it s not because hillary lost. if you read the book you know there was an incredibly contentious relationship between hillary clinton and the press and my position as the lead beat reporter. she called the political press big egos and no brains. i think that tension carried over and spilled over into that u.n. press conference where she had to address the private email server for the first time. howie: you say the email scandal
Every democrat voted against it. so there s a clear line and i expect president trump to let mrs. mccaskill to know she didn t vote for the tax cuts. rich is still upset that hillary lost, i think. you want a referendum, what about nancy pelosi? lamb ran against nancy pelosi. that s very different than the open seat in georgia when handel won because it was a national election about nancy pelosi. lamb was very smart to keep it local and away from nancy pelosi. he said he would vote against her. richard, isn t that the conundrum for democrats? can every democrat run as a pro tariff, pro tax cuts, pro gun? maybe the party has a part. and by the way, anti-nancy pelosi candidate as well? you packed a lot in there,
The boomerang to the dnc launched against donald trump in his administration sean: obama said i could never happen! he would have to be no serious person would ever believe it until hillary lost. lets translate what we now know, sean. this is the ultimate information operations campaign. vladimir putin managed to place russian disinformation lies about a presidential candidate into the u.s. system through hillary clinton, through the dnc, into the justice system, so it actually landed in front of a fisa court judge. that is the normative what we are talking about. have 40 seconds,. michelle malkin. the worst part of all this isni that they knew from the beginning and the only person that give us russian lies in my campaign was hillary. hillary clinton, that s right.
Unprecedented level. of course, trump campaign associates. then, of course, as the trump bought and paid for dossier. we still need to get to the truth on that. hillary clinton didn t care about paying for false information, russian government lies to influence an election. the f.b.i. took that completely unverified dossier. they have a legal and an ethical and protocol obligation to do it themselves. they lied to a fisa judge. they never verified. they never verified or corroborated or told the judge that clinton paid it. remember the grassily-graham memo, the dossier that made up the bulk of the fisa application. the former assistant f.b.i. director testified no dossier, there wouldn t have been a fisa application. they never verified. they never checked. they didn t care. this is the biggest abuse of power scandal in the history of the country. the biggest corruption scandal
Launched, the left launched about donald trump and his administration sean: wait, obama said it could never happen. he said no serious person would ever believe it. until, of course, hillary lost. but let s translate. let s translate what we now know. this is the ultimate information operations campaign. vladimir putin managed to place russian disinformation, lies, about a presidential candidate in to the u.s. system through hillary clinton, through her lawyer, through the d.n.h. into the justice through the d.n.c. in the justice system so it landed in front of the fisa court judge. that s the enormity of what we are talking about. sean: 40 seconds, michelle malkin. the worst part is they knew from the beginning and the only person that gave us russian lies in themca pain was hillary. hillary clinton. that is right. the clinton cash machine that
Then, of course, we learn later by his own admission he leaked to the media. sean: but there is so much more. they were very clear. i talked to my sources and i know sara talked to her sources, be clear here. this doesn t include unmasking or the dossier. this doesn t include the corrupt uranium one deal. this is but the small, this is a small sliver. what i m trying to understand is how we got to a point in this country where lies can literally run this rampant and be this corrupt at the highest level of the f.b.i., the intel community and our government. and the democrats, they spread these lies. because the obama administration for eight years was enabling this and protecting people. i ll give you an example. james clapper, a known liar. he lied to congress. then he got caught. sean: what if i lied to congress? he should have been charged with perjury but the obama