President isn t standing up for election integrity writ large. juan: thank you. dana: that is part of the division. greg: get over it. they didn t cause hillary to lose. hillary lost. juan: they did. [all speaking] lisa: i d like to finish my points. alternatively you look at democrats pushing for electors. it does more to hurt the electoral process. what s the point in voting if you re going to have faceless electors. democrats are pushing for that that does more to hurt the process than $2,000 spent on social media. jesse: juan, do you really think there are some embarrassing emails about hillary and chelsea s wedding, that it swung the election away from hillary clinton? juan: the last ten days. the comey stuff and the anthony weiner emails. jesse: hillary is
Understanding that our main challenges are in asia. bret: a.b., i have a feeling i know what you are going to say. he also took shots at 1,000 points of light. george h.w. bush, john mccain, and obviously democrats were a big target as well. i think his lounge act is getting a little old. if it actually means that he turns out voters in a midterm election when he is not on the ballot, and these reporters turn out and i do feet jon tester and all these states that he goes, states that he won, hillary lost. democrats are defending their seats, then there is some point to it. exercise, we don t know the result because is he not campaigning for himself anymore. i think picking on john mccain and george herbert walker bush is ghastly. we will see if a portion goes out to the polls other republicans as a result of thieves routines. bret: next up. the panel reacts to my interview with congressman
That he feels that if he had run in 2016, this, meaning trump may not have happened. he is joe from scranton. and all of those midwestern working class voters who hillary lost would be willing to give him a chance. and the one thing that has been in the past when susan talks about the differences between the past and the present, what was a potential liability for joe biden in the past is now viewed as authenticity. that is well said. reagan tried to do this back in when in the hell was that? 76. it didn t work. is that feasible for a president. my running mate is going to be ready to take over.
Time and when you hear in their texts for them to have such sustained for giant group of american people and to call the whole group of people names to think that those people are in charge of justice is terrifying and will these guys hold them responsible? cathy: we still don t know. they are human, they show they are human which is scary. it s not an excuse. unfortunately, they have these horrible personalities that came out on text. hillary lost. it s not like it worked. the grand plan didn t work. trump didn t win. so comey is hillary would tell you herself, she blames comey for losing the elections of didn t work. everything they tried if you think they were helping her, they didn t help in any way. if payment is about using those opinions in your job where it s not appropriate and their job in law enforcement in the same way that leads officers are supposed to be blind to the color of your
instead of investigating president trump, they should go to bellevue! whack adoodles! hillary, what s going to happen! i need a psychiatrist! talking about prosecutors and fbi agents, saying they re whack-a-doodles and psychiatric hospital. that was nice. there were a lot of people shocked and disappointed to hear you attacking prosecutors and fbi agents. well, i m sorry. i had to put prosecutors and not fbi agents but other law enforcement in jail when i was a prosecutor. never shrunk from that responsibility. some of them are unfair. some of them are unethical. the guys who were taking vacations and tickets and they should be prosecuted. and the ones i was talking about were the instances where people were described as crying when hillary lost. i said if you re an fbi agent or prosecutor that s crying and you work for me, i m sorry, i would send you for a mental evaluation. and you shouldn t be working on a case where you have such a severe bias.
talking about prosecutors and fbi agents saying they should go to bellevue. there were a lot of people who were shocked and disappointed to hear you attacking prosecutors and fbi agents. i m sorry but i had to put some in jail when i was a prosecutor. some of them are unfair and unethical. the guys taking vacations and tickets, they should be prosecuted. and the ones i was talking about were instances where people were described as crying when hillary lost. i said if you an fbi agent or prosecutor who is crying when you work for me i would send you for a mental evaluation. you shouldn t be working on a case with such a severe bias. excuse me if i think it doesn t effect your judgment. you don t agree with people
Would be competence, but the reality is, nothing came of it. there was no quid pro quo for it. in essence, if the president had colluded, which he didn t the presidll tell you in the two years after the election, i just didn t talk to any russians, i don t know any russians. laura: he didn t drink, so you know he didn t order a white russian. he doesn t drink at all. they were bitter over losing the election and some right in muller s office were the ones crying like babies the night that hillary lost. if they are trying to delegitimatize him. we want the president said he regrets not having a better relationship with russia because of all of this that s a national se collateral damage of this investigation. thank god he was able to do career. thank god he is a man of discipline and cou do career. laura: rudy giuliani,
About what he said. and so he came up with this statement, which is absolutely patently false. it is jennifer s 100% correct. we know there s been collusion. the question is whether it s criminal collusion. but there has actually been determined facts that the trump campaign itself was colluding with russia to ensure hillary lost and donald trump won. does that explain, though, the rock and the hard place does that explain and the desire to maintain control in congress. does that explain what mitt romney said about donald trump? i believe this was today. i think president trump will be renomina my parteasily, and i think he ll be re-elected solidly. i think that not just because of the strong economy and because people are increasingly seeing rising wages, but i think it s also true because i think our democrat friends are likely to nominate someone who is really out of the mainstream of american thought. this is mitt romney, who went to a stage during the campaign in
Statement, which is absolutely patently false. it is jennifer s 100% correct. we know there s been collusion. the question is whether it s criminal collusion. but there has actually been determined facts that the trump campaign itself was colluding with russia to ensure hillary lost and donald trump won. does that explain, though, the rock and the hard place does that explain and the desire to maintain control in congress. does that explain what mitt romney said about donald trump? i believe this was today. i think president trump will be renominated by my party easily, and i think he ll be re-elected solidly. i think that not just because of the strong economy and because people are increasingly seeing rising wages, but i think it s also true because i think our democrat friends are likely to nominate someone who is really out of the mainstream of american thought. this is mitt romney, who went to a stage during the campaign in 2016 in utah and sai donald
Criminal collusion. but there has actually been determined facts that the trump campaign itself was colluding with russia to ensure hillary lost and donald trump won. does that explain, though, the rock and the hard place does that explain and the desire to maintain control in congress. does that explain what mitt romney said about donald trump? i believe this was today. i think president trump will be renominated by my party easily, and i think he ll be re-elected solidly. i think that not just because of the strong economy and because people are increasingly seeing rising wages, but i think it s also true because i think our democrat friends are likely to nominate someone who is really out of the mainstream of american thought. this is mitt romney, who went to a stage during the campaign in 2016 in utah and said donald trump was a con. he was a fraud. he was a fake. he was very, very not smart, and who mocked him for all of his