Live Breaking News & Updates on Instances

Stay informed with the latest breaking news from Instances on our comprehensive webpage. Get up-to-the-minute updates on local events, politics, business, entertainment, and more. Our dedicated team of journalists delivers timely and reliable news, ensuring you're always in the know. Discover firsthand accounts, expert analysis, and exclusive interviews, all in one convenient destination. Don't miss a beat — visit our webpage for real-time breaking news in Instances and stay connected to the pulse of your community

Life Liberty Levin

they go on cnn. michael cohen is an example part of this gag order president trump is not free to respond to this. what you make on this gag order? or some glad you hit on this. in my experience we are now pushing almost 30 years in the criminal justice system, the only instances in which a gag order has been issued i spent what it is intended to protect the defendant in the case. and that is when you use the gag order. and that it applies to the government. it applies to witnesses it is a universal application. i have never seen anything like this where the defendant is actually given the gag order, cannot say anything about the case but others are free to say things. it is frustrating to those of us who watch this. this is not a common prosecution. it's not the use of facts, the adherence to law.

President , Gag-order , Trump , Part , Cnn , Criminal-justice-system , Experience , Example , Michael-cohen , 30 , Case , Defendant

Life Liberty Levin

michael cohen is an example part of this gag order president trump is not free to respond to this. what you make on this gag order? or some glad you hit on this. in my experience we are now pushing almost 30 years in the criminal justice system, the only instances in which a gag order has been issued i spent what it is intended to protect the defendant in the case. and that is when you use the gag order. and that it applies to the government. it applies to witnesses it is a universal application. i have never seen anything like this where the defendant is actually given the gag order, cannot say anything about the case but others are free to say things. it is frustrating to those of us who watch this. this is not a common prosecution. it's not the use of facts, the adherence to law.

President , Gag-order , Part , Criminal-justice-system , Trump , Experience , Example , Michael-cohen , 30 , Case , Defendant , Instances

Life Liberty Levin

michael cohen is an example part of this gag order president trump is not free to respond to this. what you make on this gag order? or some glad you hit on this. in my experience we are now pushing almost 30 years in the criminal justice system, the only instances in which a gag order has been issued i spent what it is intended to protect the defendant in the case. and that is when you use the gag order. and that it applies to the government. it applies to witnesses it is a universal application. i have never seen anything like this where the defendant is actually given the gag order, cannot say anything about the case but others are free to say things. it is frustrating to those of us who watch this. this is not a common prosecution. it's not the use of facts, the adherence to law.

President , Gag-order , Part , Trump , Criminal-justice-system , Experience , Example , Michael-cohen , 30 , Case , Defendant , Instances

BBC News Now

because he posted several negative things about things he is not allowed to post about, the jurors, anyone taking part, court staff. they are saying he did that and violated at least three times the order. and they bought of other instances where he may have violated the gag order, so thejudge instances where he may have violated the gag order, so the judge will hear evidence on that. you mentioned the 'u , 12 hear evidence on that. you mentioned the jury. 12 peeple _ hear evidence on that. you mentioned the jury. 12 peeple on _ hear evidence on that. you mentioned the jury, 12 people on that _ hear evidence on that. you mentioned the jury, 12 people on thatjury - thejury, 12 people on thatjury have been confirmed, how tricky was the process?— the process? very tricky process, 300 prospective _ the process? very tricky process, 300 prospective jurors _ the process? very tricky process, 300 prospective jurors and - the process? very tricky process, 300 prospective jurors and going| 300 prospectivejurors and going many questions where they could be fair and many questions where they could be fairand impartial, both sides many questions where they could be fair and impartial, both sides said they were not expecting to find people who have been living under a rock for the past eight years so they will know who trump is and what sort of person he is. it was difficult for trump at certain times because he had to listen to jurors who were very negative about his

Things , Jurors , Times , Order , Part , Court-staff , Anyone , Three , Gag-order- , People , Process , Evidence

The Faulkner Focus

immediately as you would in any location. but in terms of decisions of the university in this regard, that's really a question for the university. >> [inaudible question] >> so there have been a small number of instances in connection with some protests on campus. i don't have an exact number for you. i know on october 12th there was a very large protest and counter protest on campus. i remember in connection with that the university did ask us to have a presence on campus to make sure that everyone was safe. that was october 12th. there may have been some other instances between october 12th and last thursday. i couldn't give you an exact number. whatever that number is would be

University , Inaudible-question , Decisions , Terms , Location , Regard , Protests , Number , Instances , Connection , Campus , Protest

CNN This Morning

intends to testify. >> i think it's way too early for criminal defendant to make that decision, and i am a criminal defense attorney at this point, so i see it from both sides. now, if donald trump chooses to testify, it's because the underlying elements of this case require the prosecution to establish beyond a reasonable doubt what was the specific intent of donald trump himself? and so if he testifies he's effectively getting up there to say that it was not his intention to cook the books as it were, or to interfere with the election by not according certain payments to election officials. the prosecutors meanwhile, are going to have to build a case to show that donald trump has limited credibility that he's lied on several occasions depending on how you view that the prosecutors have no doubt for air that they prepared a long list of a specific specific instances of untruthfulness, and that's what ultimately will be the fight here if he testifies& bibi believed so what do expecting

Donald-trump , Decision , Case , Elements , Sides , Defendant , Defense-attorney , Point , Prosecution , Intent , Intention , Books

Dateline

he didn't scare easy. >> steve was aware some criminals he dealt with might pose a threat. >> i can recall a couple of specific instances where he showed me a photograph and he said, if you see this person, anywhere near you, you are to call the police. >> still, he always tried to calm natalie's nerves. >> i remember a dinner where he said to me, babe, relax. in these situations, there are bigger fish to fry than me. they will always go after a judge or an attorney before they ever come to me, so you don't need to worry, because we'll always have a warning. i will always have a warning. and i will know what to do. so, the circumstance, losing him the way that we did, was -- stunning to me. >> one of the rare times he was

Steve-pitt , Threat , Person , Criminals , Instances , Couple , Anywhere , Photograph , He-didn-t-scare-easy , Babe , Phoenix-police , Natalie-collins

The Last Word With Lawrence ODonnell

they leave to the sound discretion of the trial judge. it's really up to him. he's the man on the ground looking at the evidence. so you see this act after act, where judges have found that trump has abuseed the legal process or that trump has lied. his lawyers are objecting saying these are facts that have nothing to do with this case and they couldn't come in and that's just not what this argument is about. because as adam has done a great job of laying out. the only thing the government could use these prior instances for, at least on cross- examination is to attack donald trump's credibility so that they can then argue to the jury, you shouldn't believe anything he told you on the stand. any defenses he said this man has lied in the past. and you should judge his credibility today in light of all these other times he's been less than truthful. that should be enough to keep him off the stand. but with trump, who knows. >> right. and joyce, as an attorney did

Trump , Man , Judges , Process , Evidence , Act-after , Trial-judge , Discretion , Ground , Thing , Case , Lawyers

The Last Word With Lawrence ODonnell

sound discretion of the trial judges. it's up to him. he is the man on the ground looking at the evidence so you see this act after act where judges have found that trump has abused the legal process or that trump has lied. his lawyers are objecting saying these are facts that have nothing to do with this case and they couldn't come in and that's just not what this argument is about because as adam has done a great job the only thing that's government could use these prior instances for at least on cross is to attack donald trump's credibility to argue you shouldn't believe anything he told you on the stand. he has lied in the past and you should judge his credibility light of all the other times he has been less than truthful. that should be enough to keep him soff the stand but with trump who knows. >> did we learn anything this

Trump , Judges , Man , Process , Evidence , Act-after , Trial-judges , Discretion , Ground , Amanda-case , Lawyers , Thing

The Last Word With Lawrence ODonnell

week about the control his lawyers are able to exert over him? >> well i think what we learned is that the judge does not believe that his lawyers can control him. i don't think that the judge was being critical of the lawyers. i think he was just acknowledging the reality that this week prosecutors identified seven additional instances where donald trump violated a clear gag order. this is a client who is out of control. a client who does not understand the bounds of nd propriety, who shows no concern about the safety of witnesses and family members of court people. this not the typical client who listen to his lawyers and there was one jonathan, just one little bit we got from reporting in the courtroom that i thought was telling it was that as jurors -- potential jurors came into be questioned everybody in the courtroom rises. that's what you do in oda trial the jury comes in and out ahead of everybody else. all of outhe lawyer, the

Judge , Lawyers , Control , Him , Donald-trump , Prosecutors , Gag-order , Client , Instances , Reality , Seven , Witnesses