> okay. i guess everything would be a good start. >> okay. there's that. >> primarily the"> > okay. i guess everything would be a good start. >> okay. there's that. >> primarily the" property="og:description"> > okay. i guess everything would be a good start. >> okay. there's that. >> primarily the">
wrong about isis." okay. what does the gop get wrong about isis? >> okay. i guess everything would be a good start. >> okay. there's that. >> primarily the fact that these are human beings who can be killed with air strikes and it's an army that will need to be defeated and we're getting a repeat cycle of torture and islamaphobia. >> in your piece you say, carpet bombing, waterboarding, surveillance of everyone, the republican strategies for dealing with the so-called islamic state sound like a laundry list of the monumental failures from the 9/11 decade. >> definitely. i think that the republican party wants to sell itself as the military minded alternative to the democratic party but the fact is that it's an unelectable position to advocate some of the