Dilution Act Applies to Debate Between Jack Daniels and Dog

Jack Daniel v. VIP Products the Supreme Court in a unanimous decision held that a trademark claim concerning dog toy designed to look like a bottle of Jack Daniels whiskey does not receive special First Amendment treatment.

Related Keywords

Tennessee , United States , Iowa , Justice Thomas , Justice Alito , Justice Kagan , Justice Gorsuch , S Doganm Lemley , Doggie Walker , Smella Arpaw , Jack Daniel , Justice Sotomayor , Justice Elena Kagan , Jack Daniels , Justice Brown Jackson , Circuit Court , Jack Daniels Properties Inc , Jack Daniel Props Inc , District Court , Supreme Court , Case In The District Court , Jack Daniel Properties Inc , Tennessee Sour Mash , First Amendment , Lanham Act , Ninth Circuit , Oral Argument , Daniels Properties , Bad Spaniels , Dos Perros , Canine Cola , Second Circuit , Bad Spaniel , Judge Sotomayor , Justices Thomas , Solicitor General , Trademark Law Through Use , Legal , Business , Government , Ack Daniels Sues Dog Toy Company , Anham Act Dilution , Ree Use In Parody Products , Ogers V , Grimaldi ,