Transcripts For FOXNEWSW The 20240703 : vimarsana.com

FOXNEWSW The July 3, 2024

Laura good evening come i am Laura Ingraham and this is the Ingraham Angle from washington tonight. The great deflection. That is the focus of tonights angle. Now the globalist insisted that if the house didnt relent and push for the 60 billion for that losing the war effort in ukraine, america would lose credibility because Vladimir Putin would rush Totute Berlin and trying to embolden to move on taiwan. Weakness is what the world would see. But now that Speaker Mike Johnson has madee jozelenskyy, northam come run happy for it by getting money to your crane, we have the respect that as a country, right . Oh course not rse if you care about the way america is perceived around thee world, you should be enraged that donald trump is on trial in new york. These are the types of electionyear shenanigans that happen in other countries in third world the talker sees, not in the United States, come on by his press minions areon ecstatic. Anything to avoid covering the border or gas prices or food prices. From where i was sitting, he seemed basically inert. He kind of shrugged his shoulders and im a slump shouldered person and slump shoulder like this when he came thein sitting there and leaning heavily on the desk. There are times he leaned onee o side or the other. He seems thinner than i have seen him in the past, he seems considerably older. And he seems annoyed, resigned, may be angry. He seems like , maa man who is l miserable. Ike hei know he seemed old, tir. Laura well, look, if that is the new barometer, well, what is bidens excuse. S because if trump is mad, he has right to be and so do all of you. An impartial observer knows that the new york media is doingin everything it can tog influence the jury. And even the trial, the illustrious new york slimes published a piece titled will a mountain of evidence be enough to convict trump . Th and the official record, the peoples versus the state of new york donald trump, for now the people have the stronger hand. Er they have insider witnesses my favorable jury pole and a payoff porn star. Every juror should have beenas asked and i dont think they were, maybe they were come i dont think they were if he oros she read or even skimmed or even saw that headline, read theline article. By the way, the New York Times doesnt pretend to be objective. You have to read to the end to read the Pivotal Point about how their star witness, Michael Cohen, has his own credibility issues to overcome. He is a convicted felon and an admitted liar. Bufelot at least he has nonlawys on tv trying to lend a hand. Sometimes you have inc. You all talked about a witness you have to rehabilitate when they get on the stand. I think it is also true that Michael Cohen along with theumen documents, but just his personality, he may actually be a very good witness, especially with these jurors here and we will wait and see,th but its, e communicates well. Laura he communicates well . Low bar. The man is a chug Heades W And N former Celebrity Reporters cant see that hes a jughead. As we demonstrated, braggs case is the epitome and election meddlingelec here at the underlg payments if anything are O Misdemeanors and the statue of limitations is run on him. If this is all secondary to the regime media or where real reporters love covering real campaigns, these people love affording them. This is the first of potentially four Criminal Trialt Trump could face this year going into the president ial election. He still needs to talk to voters. Joe biden is doing the opposite of a rose garden bid strategy. He is s out there on the campain trail. Laura okay, all right, you forgot about the pacbell biden rallies, oh, the Convenient Store stops. Those Convenient Store stops are with enthusiasm. The only one excited was the cameraman there. I dont even think that person was too excited. Almost everything you are going to hear about this trial, almost everything, is pure propaganda at this point. It is meant to demoralized trump supporters, but what it does is expose the media. He sits behind the defense in the courtroom and trying to, improvise his Campaign Scheduler they get one day a week of may wednesday in the middle of the week and only so much you can do with the limited time they have. Only so much you can do with limited time opaque my real journalist would be concerned the voters are getting a distorted picture with trump sidelined by State Prosecutor of the opposite party. A real journalist would see if this practice becomes the norm will never have a real election again, just a series of focus indictments by state ags or city das designed to skewed the campaign. Look, these phony journalists arent thinking about they ramifications of any of those here they are just relishing the moment and acting as the Asunofficial Alms team of the bn campaign. It seems as though biden is closing the gap. They were supposed to have a campaign in North Carolina but nothing on the schedule, there is nothing for about over a week. Reality sinking and he cant just be wednesdays and saturdays in this campaign. Laura that is the whole isnt it . Just as biden needed covid asas the excuse to keep him in the basement, he needs trump stuck in court off of the trail if hes ever going to have a prayer every election. Ofwill this work . Not if trump plays his cards right. Most americans come i think, have their view of this trial here or there is no point in relitigating it every day the courtroom. So i would say instead of talking about the trial, pivoted to the news of the day and put biden on trial. Reiterate that americans deserve e aa real campaign, a real ageny for prosperity, a real border, and i think he, the candidate, will deliver all of it pure to come voting time, voters should reject what is a grand effort at rejection. And remember it is bidens record oian trial. He should be convicted multiple accounts of aggravated assault causing grievous injury to the america we knew and still love. And that is the angle Pure Joy Meet Jonathan Turley and law professor, fox news contributor, jonathan lets start with the first witness david becker from her and ceo american inc. He read why is he important tom them . And what does it telwhl you abot braggs case . It was a rather bizarre stari because hes talking abouts no something thats not part of the indictment. Its like having a Bank Robbery Case and they are starting out with taxting evasion witness. If i was one oaxf the jurors, ia would be confused, is that somehow part of this Odd O Conspiracy Defrauding Effort Bye the president . And the answer is no pier they got the judge to agree to bring tthis in to show a pattern, but frankly, it has very little to linchpins they have to esta establish. Does the evidence showed that trump had the intent to somehow commit fraud . Nt tmmit and part of that is still this search for what crime trump was trying to conceal . Because even after the first day of this trial, not just on this network. Teople are debating with tha crime is. Su at the suggestion is that he did all of this because he committed a federal election law crime. But the Department Of Justice rejected that. They did not prosecute, did not charge them and many experts in the field said no, this is not a federal crime. So if you get even below the surface by 1 millimeter, you are left with a really confusing case. Laura well, judge merchan allowed d. A. Alvin bragg to bring up in Cross Examination if trump testifies some of the old trump behavior, you know, Letitia James, king carol case. Showed, first of all, but did you think of that ruling . To me, that seemed unbelievably political, it sen my view. But is that trying to scare trump away from exercising his constitutional right to testifyt in his own defense, even if you think that is the wrong thing to do . It seems strange. I thought it was surprising in the broad scope because hrprl could have allowed that tolo coe in if it became relevant for impeachment if trump tripped a wire that was to those cases. S, but he went broad and as a b result most Criminal Defense Attorney said dont take the stand. Im not one of the attorneys come im a Criminal Defense Attorney but im not one of the Defense Attorneys that reflect always says, lets not take the stand. Letattorneys be conservative. But i think Celebrity Cases my you sometimes need to take the stand. But after that ruling, no, i would advise him not to do it. The risks are too high. I t. This is a very weak case he rd going on the stand really gives the District Attorney a chance to try to revive it. Laura now, President Trump, he frequently will go outside of the courtroom and then comment about what happened inside of the courtroom. Now, we used to have some clients that like to do that as well. As lawyers, we were like no, let us handle it. We are litigating the case you are you will not win it outside. He has his own man and will make his own decisions but on thatat particular score, what would you suggest if you had to suggest t a client, even a celebrity d client. Does that make sense or could you give ammo to the other side unwittingly by doing so . I think it is a mistake mis because they say Football Games are won by inches. You can give up any yards with one ill considered statement. That stuff can be admissible. I think you have to be much moru careful from this point on in what you say. You can talk about a lot of things, but youve got to be careful because you are in the middle of a mine field you dont want to misstep. Laura jonathan, going back to the New York Times piece, the mountain of evidence against former President Trump. I dont know if the jurors were asked about this, but that basically laid out the entire prosecution, prosecutions case arguing recently for the prosecution. And again, it raises this question, how do you get impartial jury because it is Jury Tampering by the New York Times . First of all, you need a true snail view that this is a mountain. Because a birdsi dont see it. What i see is a bunch of unconnected facts that arent ultimately linked to a felony crime. In fact, they are linked to a dead misdemeanor. But look, we know this is going to happen. You see this already, even though legal liberal experts dont see the crime either andcr certainly never seen a case like this one. The media is expected to become this echo chamber for the District Attorney. And even if you tell jurors to avoid the news, there was no real guarantee that they are going to do that. They will be in a city that is absolutely saturated with it. The defense has to go in and assume all of those failsafes have failed, and that you willgn have to make that case even mstronger in the courtroom. Laura jonathan, always wonderful to see you. Thank you. All right, a judge swept down new york ag Letitia James latest attempt to topple trump. Plus, what is happening this plus, what is happening this week to change the course of trumps trials . We examine it next. And retirement savings. Presentation looks great. Thanks thanks voya provides tools that help you make the right investment and benefit choices so you can reach todays financial goals. That one and look forward, to a more confident future. That is one dynamic duo. Voya, well planned, well invested, well protected. Shipstation saves us so much time it makes it really easy and seamless pick an order print everything you need slap the label on ito the box and its ready to go our cost for shipping, were cut in half just like that go to shipstation tv and get 2 months free laura this Bogus Hush Money Trial gets underway in manhattan. Letitia james with her crusade against trump. S been mightily, if you recall, 70 billion bond validated. But a new york judge ruled against her. A she walks away and normalla had a trial on 175 million, that is Letitia James. She wont come to the white house, by the way. When you look at the numbers, they are around 1,000,000,000. 18 billion. She just tried to embarrass everybody come and she tried to embarrass the company by saying they were not credit worthy. Twor laura regarding that classified documents case, by wednesday of this week, Theand Grand Jury Testimony Transcript of former Trump Aid Set to bele released. And then thursday is the big one, the Supreme Court will hear arguments on trumpss president ial immunity claim. Joining me to tell senator mike lee and also with me mike davis, article 3 projecr founder, former core search clerk. Lets start with you, senator Supreme Court case, a lot has beenprem said about youo do you think it would be likely a majority of this court would say that President Trump orr president ial immunity applies to these cases . S . Yeah, i certainly think it should be likely and i think it will be likely. The reason is this there can be no dispute no matter how loud liz cheney and the Democratic Party want to shout. No matter around gossiping around the Water Cooler Aboutte legal theories they can come up with next. President donald trump was, in fact, president of the United States january 6th. And you have to respect that fact in court lest every president moving forward isto going to be hobbled by a short awareness and the fact anything he or she may do could wind up bringing that president into court once the president is no longer in office. We dont want that as a country. I think the Supreme Court knows that is not workable nor justifiable under the courts jurisprudence. Laura speaking of liz cheney she wrote this in the oped in the New York Times, the Supreme Cour Guint should actld quickly and of course published in the New York Times. The justice should recognize profoundly negative impact thedy may have if the court does nott resolve these issues quickly and decisively. Mike, now shes an unofficial Litigant Petitioner before the court. I would say te coo liz cheney come i would say to liz cheney and these other watchdog lou republican politicians, this is so much bigger than donald trump. This is about the presidency. An if you can indict it president of the United States for his official acts, not his personal x, his official acts, we are going to destroy the presidency, and therefore disprove the mic destroyed the president. Can the Justice Department charge president obama Forca Picapital murder for his extrajudicial drone strike of two american citizens, including a minor . Ann thd the seven justice depart charge illegal mass parole of migrants into the country and resulting crimes . Do the democrats really want to go down this path . Laura senator i think of chief Justice Roberts who was kind of institutionalist. He likes to stand for the Executive Branch, and i think othersr th on the court do as w. Again, this could be put an end to all of these cases. But im concerned that there also might be through the Court Running this fear of their ownye credibility, being put at issue, if indeed, they shortcircuit. The democrats tried to shortcircuit. Lets take chief Justice Roberts as your question was directed to him principally. First and foremost, you are right,s an laura, he is an institutionalist. Wants to make sure the Constitution Isdifi solidified in a way that allows for each of these institutions, each of these prebranches to continueinst operating as coorde branches within the federal government. That is unworkable. If Living Breathing Embodiment of the entire Executive Branch of government has toranc live eo moment of four year presidency under the brooding threat of eventual litigation and criminal charges over official acts taken by that person while that person was president , it doesnt work. Chief Justice Roberts is going to see that, yes, Politicalossc Crosscurrents hear, hear at about legally, they should be a nobrainer for at least a majority if not unanimous court. Laura mike and rainsenator lee, thank you both. Mom behavior taking over alleger campuses and passover begins tonight. A student was stabbed in. The ee with a palestinian f

© 2025 Vimarsana