Biggest News aggregator with 200 million news articles | vimarsana.com

cross examination t. other this eng is he could wreck his own defense. does he say i want to die? please put me to death. that certainly, if the jury believes he wants to do i, maybe they don't put him to death. there is an interesting psychology and die namic you will play out and obviously we're presuming the jury will find him guilty. i think at a good presumption to be making. >> there is no doubt about his guilt that he was involved. talk to us what we can expect. because the might be knew. >> interestingly enough mikaela, what you will expect is the why he did it. i think you will learn who he is. during the trial, itself we heard from one friend of his. that's it. that's a lot because the judge has limited what the defense is able to do in terms of the blame the older defense, why? it's not a defense, it's a mitigating factor. you have the opportunity the defense does to speak to the issues of mitigation. so we will learn about his family history. how he grew up what was his

Related Keywords

Jury , Defense , Death , Psychology , Eng , Namic , Presumption , Doubt , Guilt , Lot , Terms , Judge , Friend , Guess What Mikaela , Trial , One , Opportunity , Issues , Family History , Mitigating Factor , Mitigation ,

© 2024 Vimarsana