Live Breaking News & Updates on Presumption

Stay informed with the latest breaking news from Presumption on our comprehensive webpage. Get up-to-the-minute updates on local events, politics, business, entertainment, and more. Our dedicated team of journalists delivers timely and reliable news, ensuring you're always in the know. Discover firsthand accounts, expert analysis, and exclusive interviews, all in one convenient destination. Don't miss a beat — visit our webpage for real-time breaking news in Presumption and stay connected to the pulse of your community

Life Liberty Levin

a presumption to allow the states to pursue any criminal matter before they pursue the federal matter. 99% of all cases out there the department of justice would say we are going to wait until the states of georgia on its case, the alvin bragg case in new york until they have gone through indictment to trial and finalize. then the department of justice would step in pr process accordg to policy. why were they ruling to violate the internal policies? they are willing to do it because it is not an effort about finding out the facts and applying the law. this is an effort to keep down a candidate that they do not want to come back into power. so i am watching and seeing this and i'm saying to myself they are violating all of our historical precedent in the criminal justice system that this country is seen today.

Matter , Cases , States , Presumption , Department-of-justice , 99 , Case , New-york , Indictment , Alvin-bragg , Georgia , It

Life Liberty Levin

they can go through that all they want. it's very difficult to get it impartial jury in the city that's 90% prov pro joe biden it an impartial biden jury it's an impartial jury. yet again this judge has the power to move the case to westchester which is more mixed even though it leans democratic these days or somewhere else just to say i do not want any criticism. i'm going to move this case to a county outside of new york going to step down find it daughter who is not raising funds off the case provided by the judges never made a political contribution which is what they are supposed to do, make no contribution. let's handle it that way. the sixth amendment, the fifth amendment, the first amendment are all under attack. what do you think? >> two things mark. there is a presumption in the department of justice policy.

Joe-biden , Judge , Jury , City , Pro , 90 , Case , Power , New-york , Criticism , County , Somewhere

Life Liberty Levin

a presumption to allow the states to pursue any criminal matter before they pursue the federal matter. 99% of all cases out there the department of justice would say we are going to wait until the states of georgia on its case, the alvin bragg case in new york until they have gone through indictment to trial and finalize. then the department of justice would step in prin process accog to policy. why were they ruling to violate the internal policies? they are willing to do it because it is not an effort about finding out the facts and applying the law. this is an effort to keep down a candidate that they do not want to come back into power. so i am watching and seeing this and i'm saying to myself they are violating all of our historical precedent in the criminal justice system that this country is seen today.

Matter , Cases , States , Presumption , Department-of-justice , 99 , Case , New-york , Indictment , Alvin-bragg , Georgia , It

Life Liberty Levin

they can go through that all they want. it's very difficult to get it impartial jury in the city that's 90% providen pro joe bidt an impartial biden jury it's an impartial jury. yet again this judge has the power to move the case to westchester which is more mixed even though it leans democratic these days or somewhere else just to say i do not want any criticism. i'm going to move this case to a county outside of new york going to step down find it daughter who is not raising funds off the case provided by the judges never made a political contribution which is what they are supposed to do, make no contribution. let's handle it that way. the sixth amendment, the fifth amendment, the first amendment are all under attack. what do you think? >> two things mark. there is a presumption in the department of justice policy.

Judge , Biden-jury , Jury , City , Providen , Joe-bidt , 90 , Case , Power , New-york , Criticism , County

Life Liberty Levin

they can go through that all they want. it's very difficult to get it impartial jury in the city that's 90% providen pro joe bidt an impartial biden jury it's an impartial jury. yet again this judge has the power to move the case to westchester which is more mixed even though it leans democratic these days or somewhere else just to say i do not want any criticism. i'm going to move this case to a county outside of new york going to step down find it daughter who is not raising funds off the case provided by the judges never made a political contribution which is what they are supposed to do, make no contribution. let's handle it that way. the sixth amendment, the fifth amendment, the first amendment are all under attack. what do you think? >> two things mark. there is a presumption in the department of justice policy.

Judge , Biden-jury , Jury , City , Providen , Joe-bidt , 90 , Case , Power , New-york , Criticism , County

Life Liberty Levin

a presumption to allow the states to pursue any criminal matter before they pursue the federal matter. 99% of all cases out there the department of justice would say we are going to wait until the states of georgia on its case, the alvin bragg case in new york until they have gone through indictment to trial and finalize. then the department of justice would step in prin process accog to policy. why were they ruling to violate the internal policies? they are willing to do it because it is not an effort about finding out the facts and applying the law. this is an effort to keep down a candidate that they do not want to come back into power. so i am watching and seeing this and i'm saying to myself they are violating all of our historical precedent in the criminal justice system that this country is seen today.

Matter , Cases , States , Presumption , Department-of-justice , 99 , Case , New-york , Indictment , Alvin-bragg , Georgia , It

Trump Trial Today

the jurors is that at the end of the case, the defense will be asking for a verdict of not guilty. the government has the burden of proof to prove beyond a reasonable doubt in nanometers lee to the satisfaction of all jurors that the defendant is guilty before they can reach a verdict of guilty. and that's a the presumption of innocence is an important legal concept. in our judicial system in a criminal case, given the fact that potentially imprisonment is on the line. and the seriousness of the case will be something that that will be a theme from todd blanche. i mean, i mean, obviously have a critique of the evidence about what the defense expects to show during the course of the trial. but he'll remind the jurors that the defendant doesn't have to do anything. he has no burden of proof. he doesn't have to present evidence. he doesn't have to testify in his own defense and it remains the obligation of the government to prove this case beyond a reasonable doubt robert, if you were trump's council in this case, would you be trying to convince him against taking the stand? and you know him well

Beyond-a-reasonable-doubt , Jurors , Defendant , Verdict , Government , Defense , Burden , Doubt , Satisfaction , Something , Line , Fact

FOX and Friends Saturday

we will not declare a mistrial, work it out. nicole: let's take this outside of the courtroom for just a second and what we have seen just throughout our nation over the last several year when it comes to support for couldn't transfer -- donald trump. you have people out wardly saying they do not feel comfortable discussing their views with their family, friends, colleagues, employers because of fear offing being persecuted for supporting donald trump. so i believe that, you know, historically in the courtroom it's not necessarily left or right, but i think that donald trump has become so polar aizing can and people feel so persecuted for supporting him that i think there's no way that that's not going to infiltrate the jury room. will: for sure. absolutely. there's an expect nation that the the presumption is 11 people, i don't think there's such a thing as an impartial person in america when it comes to donald trump. pete: no way -- will: 11 of them will be partial to being antagonistic to donald trump. and even if you have somebody who's, like, i just need to

Nicole , Donald-trump , Courtroom , Mistrial , Nation , Outside , Second , Couldn-t-transfer , People , Friends , Family , Colleagues

Hannity

when you look at how can anyone look at that environment and think that's a fair venue for donald trump? >> well i think that's a course a problem i think that many people in the public see this case for what it is which is a political use of the legal system bragg is counting on many of these jurors if not all of them ending their analysis once they see who's behind the defence table that he is counting on the fact that there will be no presumption of innocence here because this is a juror pool that voted almost unanimously against trump when you are down to just 12 percent you are getting to a statistically difficult point to come up with a fair jury does that mean they can't be fair? no but no one is betting on acquittal in new york the question is whether you will have a couple of jurors that have that confidence to stand their ground that's if i was defence counsel it so i would be

People , Donald-trump , Case , Venue , Environment , Course-a-problem , Public , Jurors , Fact , Counting , Use , Presumption

The Lead With Jake Tapper

out of some that underscores that these aren't just kind of random unnamed individuals. these are real people and this is something that you can't even fathom unless you're one of those jurors, how does that affect this case here it's it's really problematic and i've said multiple times there's the donald trump who was the innocent until proven guilty. >> and if proven guilty beyond reasonable doubt in that courtroom. and deserves the same due process and the same presumption of innocence at any one of us have. and then there's a donald trump outside that courtroom who says a lot of very vitriolic and frightening and aggressive things that gives pause. be very gentle and nice. the potential jurors. we know that about the judge we know that about prosecutors and witnesses, and it has a really negative and frightening impact on those potential jurors who are scared potentially to say, i don't want to be a part of this problem i says, i don't want to be subject to scrutiny. i don't want the media talking about me and my family. i don't want people showing up at my house or saying things about me online. so it's very again, i use the term frightening repeatedly because it has a way to taint the jury. it's not good for the jury to

Donald-trump , Civil-fraud-case , Something , Jurors , People , Some , Times , Aren-t , Individuals , One , Courtroom , Given