and her team offered up at least to this point, early on. the e-mails were mostly about logistics. they were all captured on government servers, and she wasn't aware of the rules. it is almost word for word what hillary clinton said early on on why she did what she did. so that does make me wonder if this wasn't a big deal, if this should not have been a big deal when hillary clinton did it, do democrats need to be careful on what they do with ivanka trump? >> democrats have lived this issue. it is over. democrats have gone through every piece of this, and the challenge, the criticism of hillary clinton was that she didn't take it seriously at first. that seems to be exactly what the trump administration is doing. they're not even really responding to it. they're in no way offering the fact she should go before testimony, she should talk about what was in the e-mails. another similarity between the two is it was their own lawyers who sifted through the e-mails and decided what should go in the public records and what should be preserved under the public records act. we actually don't know what was in all of the e-mails. republicans are going to try to