speech for those numbers. i just want to be clear about that i thought it was very interesting when josh earnst the white house spokesman was asked about this. kept referring back to the memorandum of understanding between the white house and state department as if this sort is we had this clear understanding about these rules, all established. leaving out the fact that reuters, jonathan allen and others have reported that they violated the terms of that memorandum, you know, that the clintons did not divulge some of the stuff to be vetted by the administration. so, i mean, the memorandum itself was violated. second of all, i just for pure political deliciousness love that they are maneuvering themselves into the position of arguing that all of the proof that they are innocent of all of these charges were just tragically deleted from her server and if only those emails still existed she woulbe able to prove that none of this is true. that's sort of where they're ending up, and lastly her tactic, which is classic clinton tactic to say this stuff has happened before, it's old news. what they do is they