> actually, the oklahoma statute specifically says that this man slaughter doesn't involve in the kind of premeditation, does not involve intent. it's specifically there -- it's not a murder charge because there is no premeditation and there is no murderus intent. that's why it's a man slaughter charge. >> and that's why the statute doesn't say -- some act outside otherwise negligence. it's not a negligence statute. that would be a civil proceeding. that's why i thought the d.a. made a mistake in feeling the pressure from the media to charge this man. >> well there are those arguing in oak object that he should Get Live News Updates Every Minute from vimarsana.com Curated from 23000 News Agencies.">
> actually, the oklahoma statute specifically says that this man slaughter doesn't involve in the kind of premeditation, does not involve intent. it's specifically there -- it's not a murder charge because there is no premeditation and there is no murderus intent. that's why it's a man slaughter charge. >> and that's why the statute doesn't say -- some act outside otherwise negligence. it's not a negligence statute. that would be a civil proceeding. that's why i thought the d.a. made a mistake in feeling the pressure from the media to charge this man. >> well there are those arguing in oak object that he should Get Live News Updates Every Minute from vimarsana.com Curated from 23000 News Agencies." property="og:description">
> actually, the oklahoma statute specifically says that this man slaughter doesn't involve in the kind of premeditation, does not involve intent. it's specifically there -- it's not a murder charge because there is no premeditation and there is no murderus intent. that's why it's a man slaughter charge. >> and that's why the statute doesn't say -- some act outside otherwise negligence. it's not a negligence statute. that would be a civil proceeding. that's why i thought the d.a. made a mistake in feeling the pressure from the media to charge this man. >> well there are those arguing in oak object that he should Get Live News Updates Every Minute from vimarsana.com Curated from 23000 News Agencies.">
officers. the difference is the word "culpable." culpable implies some mental intent to do wrong. it's not ordinary negligence. ordinary negligence is not something we prosecute and put people in prison for. >> actually, the oklahoma statute specifically says that this man slaughter doesn't involve in the kind of premeditation, does not involve intent. it's specifically there -- it's not a murder charge because there is no premeditation and there is no murderus intent. that's why it's a man slaughter charge. >> and that's why the statute doesn't say -- some act outside otherwise negligence. it's not a negligence statute. that would be a civil proceeding. that's why i thought the d.a. made a mistake in feeling the pressure from the media to charge this man. >> well there are those arguing in oak object that he should