who is considered sort of a card carrying establishment-respected conservative voice. and that is if you take it at face value, a fairly extreme statement, that you wouldn't enforce a top law enforcement official ever. i don't know how you would go about governing the country. as for the immigration issue, what is interesting about it rev, is that people of good will can disagree about the constitutionality of the executive actions regarding immigration. right now, though, they're on hold as a judge reviews them. and they go up on appeal. it doesn't even connect to, that which was of course the original claim that somehow this would be used as a bargaining chip. the process will play out. the president has said if he is rejected he'll abide those laws there is a substantive mechanism whereby messing around with this attorney general nomination does anything in actuality to effect what they had claimed they cared about, which was the immigration order. >> well this is a very important story. we're going stay on it.