Biggest News aggregator with 200 million news articles | vimarsana.com
decided to do it differently from england in all sorts of ways because that's why we fought a revolution, but one of the ways they did that was to say you know, england has a separate chief of state. the monarch. and a separate political leader, which is his or her prime minister. they wanted to combine the two and elect a leader in the united states because they wanted to make sure america never had a king or queen, which was a worthy goal. the downside is we lack this kind of ceremony and chief of state that does tie the nation together with the thread that goes all the way back to the beginning of british history. something we just don't -- >> you know, there is so much history everywhere you turn in this country. every time they break ground on a new building, they wind up with some roman artifact.