Biggest News aggregator with 200 million news articles | vimarsana.com
works against precisely the mathematical problem that the field faces, which is the more people running the better trump's odds are. >> that is true, mathematically, in the narrow sense. and far be it for me to ever disagree with mitt romney, my number one senate man there. in the republican caucus. but i do think that this kind of conventional wisdom misses what happened in 2016, which is that town trump would've won a one-on-one with anybody. in order to win the nomination you need to be able to win a large plurality of the party. this is true in both parties going back a long time. yes, the theory you can win with a narrow plurality, but there aren't a ton of examples of that. as the field started to coalesce trump beat marco in his own stupid state of florida. ted cruz. trump won because he won head to head. so this time you're going to have to beat him.