> to me, even if he did a lot of the things they're saying he did, prosecuting him, the same reasons why you wouldn't want to prosecute him as to why back in 2016 i was of the opinion that hillary clinton shouldn't be prosecuted, because there are all of these other problems. >> laura, obviously this isn't apples to apples comparison here. what are differences? >> the problem with that argument is the facts are so different. we're talking about a much larger set of classified materials in the case of trump. it's really going to come down to an evaluation of content. he's presupposing in that answer that his former client didn't Get Live News Updates Every Minute from vimarsana.com Curated from 23000 News Agencies."> > to me, even if he did a lot of the things they're saying he did, prosecuting him, the same reasons why you wouldn't want to prosecute him as to why back in 2016 i was of the opinion that hillary clinton shouldn't be prosecuted, because there are all of these other problems. >> laura, obviously this isn't apples to apples comparison here. what are differences? >> the problem with that argument is the facts are so different. we're talking about a much larger set of classified materials in the case of trump. it's really going to come down to an evaluation of content. he's presupposing in that answer that his former client didn't Get Live News Updates Every Minute from vimarsana.com Curated from 23000 News Agencies." property="og:description"> > to me, even if he did a lot of the things they're saying he did, prosecuting him, the same reasons why you wouldn't want to prosecute him as to why back in 2016 i was of the opinion that hillary clinton shouldn't be prosecuted, because there are all of these other problems. >> laura, obviously this isn't apples to apples comparison here. what are differences? >> the problem with that argument is the facts are so different. we're talking about a much larger set of classified materials in the case of trump. it's really going to come down to an evaluation of content. he's presupposing in that answer that his former client didn't Get Live News Updates Every Minute from vimarsana.com Curated from 23000 News Agencies.">

Biggest News aggregator with 200 million news articles | vimarsana.com

recommendation by the special counsel if he finds it's unwarranted by law or inappropriate under the justice department policies. i imagine that process would have taken a few weeks. it could be that he has now been given the green light and he's ready to go back and present an indictment to the grand jury. >> guys, i want to play something that trump's former lawyer said on "meet the press" yesterday. let's listen. >> to me, even if he did a lot of the things they're saying he did, prosecuting him, the same reasons why you wouldn't want to prosecute him as to why back in 2016 i was of the opinion that hillary clinton shouldn't be prosecuted, because there are all of these other problems. >> laura, obviously this isn't apples to apples comparison here. what are differences? >> the problem with that argument is the facts are so different. we're talking about a much larger set of classified materials in the case of trump. it's really going to come down to an evaluation of content. he's presupposing in that answer that his former client didn't

Related Keywords

Guys , Grand Jury , Department Policies , Law , Indictment , Recommendation , Special Counsel , Process , Light , Donald Trump , Something , Prosecuting Him , Things , Reasons , Wouldn T , Lawyer , Meet The Press , Correspondent Laura Jarrett , Hillary Clinton Shouldn T , All , Isn T , Problems , Apples To , Opinion , 2016 , Case , Client , Facts , Answer , Set , Differences , Content , Presupposing , Problem , Argument , Materials , Evaluation ,

© 2024 Vimarsana