Inmate whose hearing aid batteries weren't promptly replaced

Inmate whose hearing aid batteries weren't promptly replaced allowed to sue


Inmate whose hearing aid batteries weren't promptly replaced allowed to sue
FacebookTwitterEmail
Pedestrians walk past the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco. The court said an inmate whose hearing aide batteries weren’t replaced for month had adequately alleged “deliberate indifference” to his rights.Gabrielle Lurie/The Chronicle
A federal appeals court reinstated a lawsuit Monday by a hard-of-hearing prisoner who said that when the batteries on his hearing aid died, officers waited as long as 74 days to replace them.
When the batteries first went out in September 2017, Raymond Whitall said, nursing and mental health staff at Salinas Valley State Prison in Soledad told him they would be replaced immediately but they weren’t. He was taken to a hospital, returned to his cell nine days later, and said he learned that the batteries had been available right away but were not provided to him.

Related Keywords

Roseville , California , United States , San Francisco , Charles Breyer , Us Circuit Court , Arnold Porter , Judge Charles Breyer , Placer County , Rights Behind Bars , ரோஸ்வில்லி , கலிஃபோர்னியா , ஒன்றுபட்டது மாநிலங்களில் , சான் பிரான்சிஸ்கோ , சார்லஸ் ப்ரேயர் , எங்களுக்கு சுற்று நீதிமன்றம் , அர்னால்ட் போர்டர் , நீதிபதி சார்லஸ் ப்ரேயர் , ப்ல்யாஸர் கவுண்டி , உரிமைகள் பின்னால் பார்கள் ,

© 2025 Vimarsana