Palo Alto Networks: Centripetal patent claims are overly bro

Palo Alto Networks: Centripetal patent claims are overly broad, ineligible


Signage with logo at the Silicon Valley headquarters of computer security and firewall company Palo Alto Networks, Santa Clara, California, August 17, 2017. Palo Alto Networks asked a Virginia judge to dismiss a patent lawsuit filed against them by Centripetal Networks. (Photo via Smith Collection/Gado/Getty Images).
Palo Alto Networks asked a Virginia judge to dismiss a patent lawsuit filed against them by Centripetal Networks, questioning the broad nature of the covered technologies and processes and saying the company has not put forth any plausible evidence that their products are being copied.
In an April 30 court filing, lawyers for Palo Alto Networks claim Centripetal’s initial 146-page complaint “makes no genuine attempt to tie a complete asserted claim to any particular accused product.” The suit cites 12 specific patents, most dealing with filtering network traffic, and points to seven Palo Alto products that violate those patents. But Palo Alto’s legal team claims the charges amount to “disorganized assertions interspersed with claim language that provide no indication of how the features of the accused products allegedly satisfy the elements of the asserted claims.”

Related Keywords

California , United States , Virginia , Palo Alto , Santa Clara , Tyson Benson , Adrian Sanabria , Trademark Office , Palo Alto Networks , Sw Lab , Centripetal Networks , A Supreme Court , Silicon Valley , Alto Networks , Getty Images , Federal Circuit , Supreme Court , Asserted Patents , கலிஃபோர்னியா , ஒன்றுபட்டது மாநிலங்களில் , வர்ஜீனியா , பாலோ ஆல்டோ , சாந்தா கிளாரா , டைசன் பென்சன் , முத்திரை அலுவலகம் , பாலோ ஆல்டோ நெட்வொர்க்குகள் , உச்ச நீதிமன்றம் , சிலிக்கான் பள்ளத்தாக்கு , ஆல்டோ நெட்வொர்க்குகள் , கெட்டி படங்கள் , கூட்டாட்சியின் சுற்று ,

© 2025 Vimarsana