Young children and let the children decide when theyre old enough maybe after the great spirit is finished with are they trying to. Address Climate Change. From oscar news h. Q. Whats your teams National Daniel hawkins with you tonights welcomes program. Has ordered an analysis of the threat posed by a new u. S. Missile weapon was recently tested just after washington pulled out of a key arms control treaty with moscow the russian president also ordered a symmetrical response to the weapon. Has the story. There you have a and all the latest developments in statements are in essence the new reality of the World Without the intermediate range Nuclear Forces treaty how murder by washington and moscow decades ago and eventually torn apart after an announcement by the us President Donald Trump at the end of last year earlier this week the u. S. State department announced that the us successfully tested a new Cruise Missile that was previously outlawed by the terms of the i. N. F. Treaty plus even before that the u. S. Secretary of defense revealed that america was working on the deployment of new missiles to the asia pacific and the head of the pentagon made it clear that he wants that to happen asap now this friday the russian president as a result of that got together with the most senior russian officials that are in charge of security in this country and now hes saying that the american tests are nothing but a clear indication that washington pulled out of the treaty not because moscow was violating something russia believes that this was a well calculated plan to get their hands on tied the americans have orchestrated a Propaganda Campaign alleging violations by russia as its now clear this was just a smokescreen to hide washingtons own breaches of the treaty and its intention to leave it there so leaves 0 doubt about americas real intentions have got rid of the existing limits its now free to deploy previously for that missiles anywhere in the world top american politicians say that you systems could be deployed 1st in the Asia Pacific Region but this affects our interests as well because it is situated near our borders over the last few months we kept hearing warnings from the russian capital that if here they realize that washington is rushing to develop or deploy new missiles now that they dont have to abide by the terms of the agreement moscow will do exact. The same and on friday mr putin made it clear that the russian take on this wont change and that moscow was ready to take all the necessary steps presentable and i mean. As you know weve never wanted and still dont want to get into an arms race which is expensive and destructive for a countrys economy all the latest weapons that weve been developing were response to americas unilateral pullout from the 2003 antiballistic missile treaty we were forced to maintain the security of our people and our country we are doing the same now and no doubt will keep on doing this in the future so once again the message from the russian government is they dont want to be dragged into this game but they are being forced to do it and the response from them will come quickly. The situation surrounding the collapse of the i. M. F. Treaty was addressed at the Un Security Council where tensions flared russia and china call for Global Action to prevent a new arms race rival powers blamed each other for the ongoing escalation. Do you realize that because of the u. S. Ambitions we are one step away from an arms race that cannot be controlled or regulated in any way the United States will not remain a party to a treaty that is deliberately violated by russia. Depended only on us we would not reach this dangerous situation the United States is taking the necessary steps to address the threat posed by intermediate range Missile Forces to being deployed in ever larger numbers by russia and china as you but you know what about you are you going to avoid responsibility for what is happening in the future generations forgive you for this russias present actions are in line with a pattern of aggression that represents a clear threat to International Peace and security in the Russian Federation is the sole responsibility of the reason demise of the. Us it will be my judgment do you not understand that by your responses to the americans you are returning to historical situation with missiles targeted european cities from different sites the u. S. Is looking into different sorts of research into hypersonic live vehicles that could be destabilizing because they can cross Decision Making already youre getting. New technology and the big dangerous and risky questions is is nobody know what this will mean in the future and what this will mean for future stability and what we really need is a dialogue between the u. S. And russia as a starving person to bring the 2 sides back together because it is in everybodys mutual interests to minimize the risk of a nuclear war i think whats important to realize is that with arms control treaties the restraints on countries where heading into dangerous and uncharted territory. The consumer security. Service of activists in the u. S. Are celebrating after a court agreed to reconsider a censorship case against Facebook Google twitter and apple those bringing the lawsuit accuse the tech giants of bias of suppressing content from the conservative end of the political spectrum a controversial right wing activist is leading the case with a group called freedom watch previously been banned from all kinds of Online Platforms from twitter and facebook to pay pal nuber the lawsuit also alleges the 4 tech giants violated the 1st amendment and u. S. Anti monopoly laws have been a growing number of leaks and testimonies from those who worked for big tech alleging an anti conservative bias even a blacklist where if someone is right it does show that there are conservative and theyll be blacklisted between Different Companies and different teams. That really need to change i see google executives go to congress and say that its not going to be good it is not political and im just so sure thats not true theyre telling people that oh they dont they dont have any blacklist this is all you know they dont have any political ideology they dont have any political bias but its really clear that they do their current legal concerns is that tech giants are allowed to moderate the content which appears on their sites or through their apps theyve denied any censorship. Do you discriminate more on philosophy like anti conservative versus pro liberal no or policies and our rhythms dont take a look consideration any affiliation for speed were viewpoint there is absolutely no directive in any of the changes that we make to have a bias in anything that we do we use a robust methodology to reflect what is being said about any given topic or any particular time and we try to do it objective lee using a set of rubrics certainly if this happened to her this is happened to a lot of people and its high time that the big tech giants were challenge to hunt this theres a confusion i think because americans love free speech and we love private property so we love for example when its a company and we say well that company has a right to do anything it wants to but there comes a point where its almost like a public utility because they have such a monopoly on communication in general especially in terms of social media so some of these giants that really do have control. Theyve changed the game you can only come to one conclusion when it seems to only happen against conservatives in general and and i think that this flies in the face of of our free speech and you know that for most of us in america we could agree that our 1st amendment speech right is critical to everything that is freedom and most of us would wish that some of these tech giants would go along with that. New york times Political Editor faces charges of anti semitism and bigotry after a series of tweets he made over the years this comes after a similar scandal with the newspapers washington editor and leaked editorial types in his post tom wright of prescientific is the single out members of the jewish asian and indian communities ridiculing and insulting them on thursday you post it on policy on his social networks off the scrubbing a number of the offending tweets from his page revolution though provoked an immediate backlash. I have deleted tweets from a decade ago the door if n. Suv i am deeply sorry the Zionist Organization of america is the New York Times to immediately dismiss this individual and to undertake a review of all of the stories that he has edited for possible and to semitic bios or weve asked the New York Times to comment on the story and bring any response we do get recently leaked audit recording the executive editor of the New York Times appeared to indicate a shift in the papers agenda race in the next year is going to be a huge part of the american story and i mean race in terms of not only africanamericans and their relationship with donald trump but latino asian immigration. Were joined now by legal i media analyst law and l thanks for joining us good to have you on as always the case is that its i who published those tweets hes a partner working at the times for 5 years its very surprising is the social Network Background has only been revealed mel. I dont mean to laugh im sorry but. 10 years ago i wrote this im sorry now i didnt mean that for 10 years i have labored under this is guilty now i now ive got to come clean im so sorry about what i wrote then i havent said anything now but now that you bring this up im going to bring this up look do do do does the world understand im sure what good New York Times historically meant. They did a great oh lady the the the this bastion of the Kremlin Crown the you mount a limp piss of journalism new york. And you have dean baquet who has a town hall meeting when his employees are basically upset with the tenor with the fact that his paper is not being aggressive enough in going after trump so he has this town hall meeting where hes trying to quell the anger by saying dont worry were going to do everything we can to focus on a particular news and commentary vector a priori dont worry were going to do this when instead they should be reporting the facts this is the same dean baquet the same New York Times who recently changed the headline when certain readers didnt think it was anti trump enough can you imagine a hospital where there radiologists are say hey how come were not diagnosing more answer because we dont have that much he had to well lets start doing it this is on this is on parallel unheard of in american journalism in world journalism but from the vaunted New York Times it its its mind boggling that the executive editor of the New York Times recently appeared to indicate some sort of shift in the newspapers agenda saying race is going to be specifically one topic im going to focus on next year as can be a very huge issue where do you think that stems from. Let me translate what that meant here that is its not were going to focus on race 2 to. Explore racism no its were going to use this as an anti trump accusation point why russian collusion fell flat on its face it never went anywhere remember russian collusion wasnt a was an attempt by Hillary Clinton and her folks explain how she lost a rigged election so that didnt work so then they went into White SupremacyWhite Nationalism and of haiti but even knows what that means lester when nativism literally throw mama and now prediction you heard it here 1st its not really much of a prediction but theyre going to be going into trumps insanity his his inability to act with a deported meant that a president you have to understand when they talk about these themes its not its not subject matter cultural references no yes these are going to be the latest levels of attack against trump racism being now because again russian collusion failed and then eventually if that doesnt work watch them go into this questioning his sanity im telling you thats what this is about the degree that with those that say that Media Coverage specifically lately at least has help stoke and fuel some of those you know racial grievances you know with the Us Population in particular. Not not really because well well put it this way sincere honest racial grievances yes but the New York Times is desperately trying to hand hang on to would leadership crowd sourced opinion to actually chart imagine this to just give it a Football Game and youre on the pitch and there is the umpire the good the good im sorry im not that familiar with the terminology but the person in charge of the score turns to the crowd and says should i give you a right card what do you think a yellow card when has to have the media turn to the to the i guess the the audience and ask them what would you like us to give you meaning what worldview not what broadcast but what narrow cast what would you like us what reality would you like us to present to you this is they couldnt care less about about this and by the way of about race that is let me also keep in mind this week theyre saying that trump is a is anti semitic anti semitic let me remind the world his son in law his daughter his grandchildren one of his other daughter is dating a jewish folk i mean for somebody whos eddies a minute oh and xena phobic i forgot that 2 out of 3 wives born elsewhere this is all about trump your career probably thinking this this cant be just about trump it up about trump and whatever they have to change the trope the trump trope whatever they have to do to do that to accommodate its dwindling audience and also to fuel this trump derangement syndrome thats what theyre going to do plain and simple. The your the media analyst line of extra time today youre not in the National Great to have you on as always. Thank you sir. In australia a former defense lawyer faces jail over the leak of controversial afghan files you appeared in the Supreme Court on thursday for preliminary hearings they even mcbride released classic classified material in 2017 alleging australian troops committed war crimes in afghanistan he was charged with breaching the countrys the fence act and is expected to face trial next year it claims it was his duty to the australian people to make the documents public. Ive got a few tricks up my sleeve its worth having a go i might fail but ill be have been jailed if ive tried and one means since reported in the socalled afghan files where the killing of a civilian man and his son during a raid where it was alleged they were shot by mistake in another case an afghan detainee was shot dead while he was alone with an australian soldier if mcbride claimed before leaking the information to the media hed try to bring it to the attention of officials but his efforts were in vain we discussed the issue with former cia officer turned whistleblower john kiriakou. Its so typical its so common in places like the United States the u. K. Australia really the 5 eyes countries to attack the whistleblower rather than to address the crime and to punish those who committed the crime there ought to be hard and fast whistleblower Protection Laws there are in many countries there is not even in australia but there really need to be Legal Protections so people can can go confidently to their supervisors or to their legislature or even to the media to report crimes in this case i think that that the australian soldiers involved were probably im not even sure how to say it but sucked into the same kind of of wartime situation that so Many Americans have been sucked into you think that you can get away with things you think that they are crimes and eventually theres going to be a whistleblower you know theres theres an old saying that the truth always comes out and i think that that is the case it was the case here its been the case the United States whether its cia or n. S. A. Or f. B. I. The truth always comes out and so if you dont want trouble just do the right think. Of even couple from australia whose child was found to be seriously mamoru stuff to being placed on a vegan diet to have escaped jail offer jobs handled them ahead of them 300 hours of Community Service instead ok warning to police the baby was severely underweight after being placed on a vegan diet from birth you know and sponsored she weighed less than 5 kilograms suffering from major problems with her buns she was hardly able to eat and doctors said she developed only as much as a 3 month old and had no teeth because of a lack of necessary vitamins the parents face huge criticism for not thinking of the consequences of their actions. The founder of apparently does challenge his own parental responsibility teacher. Are by providing the necessities of life causing a danger of serious injury is undoubtedly very serious conduct and particularly where the child is very young and hes unable to independently care for himself or herself and all one put in fact out of you that there is no greater responsibility and then by a parent to his or her char to care for the child to nurture the child and to protect the child from any harm or injury caring for the go was caring for a very young baby she couldnt sit up she cou