SCOTUS Requires More Concrete Injury in Data Class Action :

SCOTUS Requires More Concrete Injury in Data Class Action


Tuesday, June 29, 2021
On Friday, a sharply divided U.S. Supreme Court issued a ruling, which significantly impacts the plaintiffs’ ability to pursue privacy and data breach class actions in federal courts. In 
TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez, Case No. 20-297, the Court opined that most of the plaintiffs failed to show a “concrete” injury and thus had no standing to pursue their claims because they did not suffer real, personal harm. Reaching beyond the specific facts of the case, this opinion bolstered the companies’ legal defense in federal privacy class actions. Despite curtailing the plaintiffs’ ability to pursue their claims in a federal court, however, this ruling does not entirely preclude such lawsuits. Rather, the plaintiffs must now carefully evaluate their likelihood of success in a federal forum before filing their case, or risk facing a heavy motion practice and ultimate dismissal on standing grounds.

Related Keywords

United States , American , , Supreme Court , Us Supreme Court , Trans Union , Federal Credit Reporting Act , Telephone Consumer Protection Act , Biometric Information Privacy Act , ஒன்றுபட்டது மாநிலங்களில் , அமெரிக்கன் , உச்ச நீதிமன்றம் , எங்களுக்கு உச்ச நீதிமன்றம் , டிரான்ஸ் தொழிற்சங்கம் , கூட்டாட்சியின் கடன் புகாரளித்தல் நாடகம் , தொலைபேசி நுகர்வோர் ப்ரொடெக்ஶந் நாடகம் , பயோமெட்ரிக் தகவல் ப்ரைவஸீ நாடகம் ,

© 2025 Vimarsana