vimarsana.com
Home
Live Updates
Transcripts For CNBC Squawk On The Street 20131115 : vimarsa
Transcripts For CNBC Squawk On The Street 20131115 : vimarsa
CNBC Squawk On The Street November 15, 2013
Taper . No. Probably not. Ill leave that to kelly evans. 2. 7. Weve been hanging around that range for some time. Lets go overseas and take a look. It was really asia that had the strongest markets in the world with the nikkei in particular. Can you see it up 2 . 7. 7 last week for the nikkei of course, theyre pressuring that yen again, the dollar gets stronger and you see what happens as theyre trying to get thing back on track in a sense after a gdp number that was a little lower than some had hoped for. Lets get to our road map this morning. Where does it start . The dow and s p, starting from another set of new highs and looking to extend the overnight cali throughout. Moodys cutting its ratings on bank saying the government is less likely to jump to rescue in the future. And paulson and loeb piling into fedex. Lets start with the markets, futures are on the rise. The dow and s p all look to set new record highs. The s p, by the way, fewer than 10 points from 1,800. We can do some quick math. In asia, the shanghai composite rallied after china released a raft of reform plans, including more than one child. Changes to the onechild policy, changes to the huko system do you want to explain what the huko system is . You can think about it as an internal passport to some extent in china. It was modelled on the ussr version of that in the late 40s, 50s. If you were a virginian moving to new york city, you would have to have a passport in order to access new york city services. If you didnt have those, youd kind of be a second class citizen and it creates a lot of hamstrings across the chinese economy. You have 700 million urban people there, kind of 200 million of which doesnt have a passport for being there. Thats why a lot of them stay at dorms if they work in the big factories. These signs of progress that indicate real reform coming in china, real consumption booms, real switch. Thats what is going to support the market here. In 1850, our country had dorms for people who couldnt afford it, emancipated those people, became the industrial country we are, that was part of the industrial revolution. China is a little behind us. One child because mao felt strongly that population control mattered, they got away from some of the maoist regime things, i think youd see more demographics also playing an
Important Role
here. We talk about it so often. China faces an issue not as bad as japan. Their aging population also and this will help conceivably. Look, what really helps is these are longterm issues by the way. Shortterm, get europe going. 25 of their exports go to europe. The pollution control problem, they cannot get control. Do you think there is a lot of talk that theyre letting the state corporations continue to thrive, which is unusual because they dont have control over them. The communists control everything. Depends who you ask. Some say they have too much control, some say theyre able to centralize so many of the services to themselves, theyre getting away from policy. Northeast asia, the japanese story, the taiwan story, it was all about marshalling stateowned companies to achieve economic outcomes and china has to unclench its claws from some of these companies and allow them to be smaller and more competitive. Theres two classes of companies that do well. Theres the
Procter Gamble
and then theres the ge cap pillars and both have been somewhat stymied of late. I was going to say the
Tech Companies
. You know
Cyber Technology
better than anybody. Te
Tech Companies
claiming its hurting their sales. Cisco in particular citing china and lack of sales there because of worries about spying. In other words, the same way we wont let waway in this country. Was there spying in russia and india, too . I dont think its spying there. And cisco suffered in the market yesterday. You had some hard things to say. Somewhat critical. A day after our new fed person, where are we . Once again were gripped with the
Money Management
imperative. You didnt get yellen say anything about having to play catch up with the averages. That has been in charge, this notion of getting long. I checked with a lot of desks yesterday. Theres not a lot of supply coming in, despite stocks rallying. Thats highly unusual, its indicative of what happens at the end of the year when people dont want to show theyre not 100 long. Sorrythe doub about the double. Typically if you talk a stock to where it literally has some supply is that because of buybacks . Also because institutions are reluctant to let go of stock. They just dont want to let go of their winners. I think you saw some of that yesterday with the i have chipotle on. Thats a classic case of what people dont want to let go. It doesnt matter that the multiple is beginning to float up to well beyond the s p. At the same time you could look at chegg,s argument for a case for a lot of the ipos, the supply is so low, thats why theyre raising the demand, but then they go to market and the trend hasnt been all that great. Whats going on there . Not that many. There has been more outperformance than not. Chegg was not a good performance. Most average up 1 18 . That was poorly priced you could say in retrospect. I think that what twitter looks look twitter looked like it bottomed. David youre stuck end lipless about talking about facebook and twitter. We joke around about that. We joke around about there are so many other stocks to talk about. Yeah, theres tesla and netflix. Oh, you solar city. I remember when i first went to a meeting with john thane of all people, he said were going to offer car loans in a security. I said you got to be kidding me . You cant do that. Now theyre doing solar panels. Then it went to home loans being packaged into new securities and then it went to ruining the
American Banking
system. But fedex, multiple buyers and no supply. At 136 theres no supply. Were going to talk more about fedex in the next block because theres some interesting things there as well. We have to keep an eye on the financials. Moodys cutting the long debt rating of goldman sachs,
Morgan Stanley
, jpmorgan. A lot of people look at this and say if anything, this is a sign of progress. Is this a reason you sell the banks . No. The case for holding them is not necessary the case the government is going to come to your rescue in exactly the same manner this time. Didnt you think its funny, wow, moodys taking aggressive action now when our banks are the most solvent in the world. One of the things that has kept europe back is they are banks getting rid of things. They are dumping. Trillions, trillions. Theyve gotten very tight in the european banks. The economy got better and theyre not loaning as much and theyre disposing of bad assets. They put themselves in a position where they could recognize the losses and part with the stuff that was marked well above what it was actually valued. Remember the old days we used to come in and say theyre vastly overvaluing their nonperformser. Draghi gave them an atmosphere where they can wait quality review, its going to be coming. Last friday we thought especially with the bit of a tech up in rates, thought maybe this would be the group that would start to move us ahead towards the end of the year. Didnt follow through this week. No, but the housing stocks moved. But thats also yellen. One more potentially that will play in and perhaps weigh on the
Banking Sector
today, i believe we can show this quote as well. Weve got holder talking to the
New York Times
indicating with regard to the probe into
Foreign Exchange
manipulation, again, this is one of the many circling at the moment, but hes saying the manipulation weve seen so far may just be the tip of the iegsberg. We recognize this is potentially an extremely consequential investigation and thats selling as well it says bank investigation, thats fx. That can be another important investigation here. Jpmorgan raised its price target to 15. I said to myself, one this evening i love about key, do you think they were manipulating currency . Do you think they were one of the big creators of no, they werent involved in libor either. Thats why i like huntington and first merit bank. The regulators are going to continue to tighten the noose. An interesting story from bloomberg last week where theyre talking about highly leveraged transaction loans and curbing them or trying to actually target, allowing only those that come in below leverage ratios, so lets call it six times, debt representing section times of ebidta. If that starts to happen, thats nuts. A bank is supposed to at least weigh risk on its own. You do wonder about their ability to ever get out from under. Youre talking about 8 to 9 multiple permanently. You just break them all up and let them do their thing. You got to figure out one way or the other. I want to raise more hell and less corn. Remember that . Yes. Coming up, soros, paulsen and loeb jumping on the fed bandwagon. Should retailers follow suit . And zulily jumping into the ipos. As we head to break, the futures still positive. The specific as much just 6 away from 1,800. Well keep an eye on that psychological level when squawk on the street continues. Y crow. [ male announcer ] the parking lot helps by letting us know whos coming. The carts keep everyone on the right track. The power tools introduce themselves. All the bits and bulbs keep themselves stocked. And the doors even handle the checkout so we can work on that thing thats stuck in the thing. [ female announcer ] today, cisco is connecting the internet of everything. So everyone goes home happy. Jbut when it comes to investing, things i prefer to do on my own. [ female announcer ] today, cisco is connecting the internet of everything. I just think its better to work with someone. Someone you feel you can really partner with. Unfortunately, ive found that some
Brokerage Firms
dont always encourage that kind of relationship. Thats why i stopped working at the old brokerage, and started working for charles schwab. Avo what kind of
Financial Consultant
are you looking for . Talk to us today. Thats a good thing, but it doesnt cover everything. Only about 80 of your part b medical expenses. The rest is up to you. So consider an aarp
Medicare Supplement
insurance plan, insured by unitedhealthcare insurance company. Like all standardized
Medicare Supplement
insurance plans, they could save you in outofpocket medical costs. Call today to request a free decision guide. With these types of plans, youll be able to visit any doctor or hospital that accepts medicare patients. Plus, there are no networks, and virtually no referrals needed. Join the millions who have already enrolled in the only
Medicare Supplement
insurance plans endorsed by aarp. And provided by unitedhealthcare insurance company, which has over 30 years of experience behind it. With all the good years ahead, look for the experience and commitment to go the distance with you. Call now to request your free decision guide. So crazy right now, most incredibly welcome back to squawk on the street. We have breaking data from the floor of the cme group. We have negative 0. 1 on production. We were expecting a plus 0. 2. Last month was plus 0. 6. Capacity 78. 1, we were expecting 78. 3. Again, its not that great of data. Hopefully we reflecting some of whats gone on in the government shutdown. Bond market stays where it is, yields are hovering around 2. 7 in the 10year. I think bad news to them still means no taper, but this is probably not bad enough to chang the way theyre thinking today. Back to you, kelly. Jim, thank you very much, sir. Just trying to take a little closer look here. Important last month given the bump from utility production is going to be whether its that unwind or whats happening with the manufacturing piece of it in particular. Well take a look into it. In the meantime, shares of fedex rising premarket, as paulsen, loeb and soros disclosing stakes in fedex. It was great. We meet with shareholders all the time. So there want anything unusual about that. And dan loeb asked if he could come down and bring a couple of analysts. They bought some shares and it was a lot of fun. Theyre very smart people. A lot of fun, very smart people. But to what extent is this really about that group of people deciding that theyre going to do something active in fedex . I mean, it doesnt appear listen, what i find these days in particular given activism has run rampant, you will get guys in stocks and then they try to encourage some of the bigger name activists to get involved. I think that was a potential here in fedex. Ive been hearing the name a lot in activist circles. Loeb got in there but apparently is not going to be active, is going to be passive and along with these other big names. But there is, jim, interestingly an activist case to be made here. Its when you look at the differences between fedex and how its run and ups, its main competitor. Many argue even who own the stock nfedex is very cheap but its run as a plane company. They dont lease their planes, they own them. They have 280 planes in the
United States
versus 150 for ups. They make most of their money on ground, not on express. When you look at the 400 to 1,200 mile delivery, they are 21 using planes at fedex versus ups. Ups has 10 billion more in revenue, 50 billion more in market cap. And so there is an argument there and it will be interesting to see if that picks up any steam and whether they just go and perhaps do a big dividend to keep everybody placated. I didnt know that. I am a much bigger believer in scott davis and ups. I did not know about all that opportunity for fedex. I just know that fedex did a restructuring when the stock was in the 80s and its been a magnificent performer. Sometimes i wish the activists sorry to beat a dead horse here but a cisco, a big cap company doing nothing. They go after fedex theyre not. There are people that see opportunities and think you could. Missed fact there. But at this point thing about names are not making an activist play and very well may not, although there may be one to make an argument that youre running it like a plane company, not logistics company. When fred smith sat down with them, hes a reasonable man. Hes an economist. He does own 20 million shares, too, not to be forgot i dont know forgotten. Hes very good. I think of all the terrible companies out there, all the companies where if we had different management, there could be some greatness. Where are the agitators . Why not look at it and say theres value to be unlocked . The agitators i think are taken aback. Its not necessarily a turn around. If youre an activist, you may not want to get involved in a turn around thats going to take years, you may change allocation to capital in some way thats going to result in a real positive. Thats another side of it. True alchemy . Conceivably. Last night i put mr. Jefferies from abercrombie and finch on my wall of shame. I think if an activist came in and replaced him, hes 69, his contracts not up, i think theres value there. Sometimes people overstay. People do overstay their welcome and boards are very forgiving. Got to go out on top. Got to know when to walk away. Coming up next, cramers mad dash. Well hear what he has to say about several stocks under the l lens this morning. Dow is about 25, shrugging off the industrial data. The manufacturing piece of it was more positive. More squawk on the street from the
New York Stock Exchange
straight ahead. Welcome back. How is everything . Theres nothing like being your own boss and my customers are really liking your flat rate shipping. Fedex one rate. Really makes my life easier. Maybe a promotion is in order. Good news. I got a new title. And a raise . Management couldnt make that happen. [ male announcer ] introducing fedex one rate. Simple, flat rate shipping with the reliability of fedex. A lot can happen in a second. With fidelitys guaranteed onesecond trade execution, we route your order to up to 75
Market Centers
to look for the best possible price maybe even better than you expected. Its all part of our goal to execute your trade in one second. Im derrick chan of fidelity investments. Our onesecond trade execution is one more innovative reason serious investors are choosing fidelity. Now get 200 free trades when you open an account. I like to dream, yes between the sound machine all right, seven minutes till the opening bell. Its friday. Im happy its friday. Im not sure why steppenwolf played a role this. Lets talk ge. Lets do it. Ge doing another pro
Shareholder Equity
offer. Conceivably. Were talking about their north american
Retail Finance
business, things like private label credit cards. We did get some sense of this in the news reports from a few weeks back. Theyre going to spin off or i should say issue up to 20 of the equity in an initial public offering. That will be done next year most likely. Then a full split off by 2015. Some people want that. Of this business. Some people want remember capital one has been a total winner. You get these credit card plays, people are very excited about them. Visa disappoint, mastercard, those are different kind of credit cards. This could be something who want a new finance name might go to. Parting ways by 2015. Lets move on to exxon mobil. This is
Warren Buffett
taking his biggest position since ibm. I had been a big derider of exxon hoping they would show production growth. This last quarter was a good quarter for exxon. A 2. 7 yield, this company is a longrange thinking, it hasnt really monetized xto yet, the natural gas company, theyve not been in favor of using natural gas as a surface fuel. I think when they change their mind, the stock will go higher. I think this is a very well company that no one, im going to use the phrase, ever got hurt owning. People run into the shares because
Warren Buffett
owns it . Oh, geez, stop it. That makes no sense at all. My charitable stock owns wells fargo and im like were not selling it because
Warren Buffett
owns it and shes like, jim, how about some rigger. Stay with us right here on squawk on the street. [ male announcer ] what if a
Small Company
became big business overnight . Like, really big. Then expanded . Or their new product tanked . Or not . What if they embrace new technology instead . Imagine a companys future with the future of trading. Company profile. A
Important Role<\/a> here. We talk about it so often. China faces an issue not as bad as japan. Their aging population also and this will help conceivably. Look, what really helps is these are longterm issues by the way. Shortterm, get europe going. 25 of their exports go to europe. The pollution control problem, they cannot get control. Do you think there is a lot of talk that theyre letting the state corporations continue to thrive, which is unusual because they dont have control over them. The communists control everything. Depends who you ask. Some say they have too much control, some say theyre able to centralize so many of the services to themselves, theyre getting away from policy. Northeast asia, the japanese story, the taiwan story, it was all about marshalling stateowned companies to achieve economic outcomes and china has to unclench its claws from some of these companies and allow them to be smaller and more competitive. Theres two classes of companies that do well. Theres the
Procter Gamble<\/a> and then theres the ge cap pillars and both have been somewhat stymied of late. I was going to say the
Tech Companies<\/a>. You know
Cyber Technology<\/a> better than anybody. Te
Tech Companies<\/a> claiming its hurting their sales. Cisco in particular citing china and lack of sales there because of worries about spying. In other words, the same way we wont let waway in this country. Was there spying in russia and india, too . I dont think its spying there. And cisco suffered in the market yesterday. You had some hard things to say. Somewhat critical. A day after our new fed person, where are we . Once again were gripped with the
Money Management<\/a> imperative. You didnt get yellen say anything about having to play catch up with the averages. That has been in charge, this notion of getting long. I checked with a lot of desks yesterday. Theres not a lot of supply coming in, despite stocks rallying. Thats highly unusual, its indicative of what happens at the end of the year when people dont want to show theyre not 100 long. Sorrythe doub about the double. Typically if you talk a stock to where it literally has some supply is that because of buybacks . Also because institutions are reluctant to let go of stock. They just dont want to let go of their winners. I think you saw some of that yesterday with the i have chipotle on. Thats a classic case of what people dont want to let go. It doesnt matter that the multiple is beginning to float up to well beyond the s p. At the same time you could look at chegg,s argument for a case for a lot of the ipos, the supply is so low, thats why theyre raising the demand, but then they go to market and the trend hasnt been all that great. Whats going on there . Not that many. There has been more outperformance than not. Chegg was not a good performance. Most average up 1 18 . That was poorly priced you could say in retrospect. I think that what twitter looks look twitter looked like it bottomed. David youre stuck end lipless about talking about facebook and twitter. We joke around about that. We joke around about there are so many other stocks to talk about. Yeah, theres tesla and netflix. Oh, you solar city. I remember when i first went to a meeting with john thane of all people, he said were going to offer car loans in a security. I said you got to be kidding me . You cant do that. Now theyre doing solar panels. Then it went to home loans being packaged into new securities and then it went to ruining the
American Banking<\/a> system. But fedex, multiple buyers and no supply. At 136 theres no supply. Were going to talk more about fedex in the next block because theres some interesting things there as well. We have to keep an eye on the financials. Moodys cutting the long debt rating of goldman sachs,
Morgan Stanley<\/a>, jpmorgan. A lot of people look at this and say if anything, this is a sign of progress. Is this a reason you sell the banks . No. The case for holding them is not necessary the case the government is going to come to your rescue in exactly the same manner this time. Didnt you think its funny, wow, moodys taking aggressive action now when our banks are the most solvent in the world. One of the things that has kept europe back is they are banks getting rid of things. They are dumping. Trillions, trillions. Theyve gotten very tight in the european banks. The economy got better and theyre not loaning as much and theyre disposing of bad assets. They put themselves in a position where they could recognize the losses and part with the stuff that was marked well above what it was actually valued. Remember the old days we used to come in and say theyre vastly overvaluing their nonperformser. Draghi gave them an atmosphere where they can wait quality review, its going to be coming. Last friday we thought especially with the bit of a tech up in rates, thought maybe this would be the group that would start to move us ahead towards the end of the year. Didnt follow through this week. No, but the housing stocks moved. But thats also yellen. One more potentially that will play in and perhaps weigh on the
Banking Sector<\/a> today, i believe we can show this quote as well. Weve got holder talking to the
New York Times<\/a> indicating with regard to the probe into
Foreign Exchange<\/a> manipulation, again, this is one of the many circling at the moment, but hes saying the manipulation weve seen so far may just be the tip of the iegsberg. We recognize this is potentially an extremely consequential investigation and thats selling as well it says bank investigation, thats fx. That can be another important investigation here. Jpmorgan raised its price target to 15. I said to myself, one this evening i love about key, do you think they were manipulating currency . Do you think they were one of the big creators of no, they werent involved in libor either. Thats why i like huntington and first merit bank. The regulators are going to continue to tighten the noose. An interesting story from bloomberg last week where theyre talking about highly leveraged transaction loans and curbing them or trying to actually target, allowing only those that come in below leverage ratios, so lets call it six times, debt representing section times of ebidta. If that starts to happen, thats nuts. A bank is supposed to at least weigh risk on its own. You do wonder about their ability to ever get out from under. Youre talking about 8 to 9 multiple permanently. You just break them all up and let them do their thing. You got to figure out one way or the other. I want to raise more hell and less corn. Remember that . Yes. Coming up, soros, paulsen and loeb jumping on the fed bandwagon. Should retailers follow suit . And zulily jumping into the ipos. As we head to break, the futures still positive. The specific as much just 6 away from 1,800. Well keep an eye on that psychological level when squawk on the street continues. Y crow. [ male announcer ] the parking lot helps by letting us know whos coming. The carts keep everyone on the right track. The power tools introduce themselves. All the bits and bulbs keep themselves stocked. And the doors even handle the checkout so we can work on that thing thats stuck in the thing. [ female announcer ] today, cisco is connecting the internet of everything. So everyone goes home happy. Jbut when it comes to investing, things i prefer to do on my own. [ female announcer ] today, cisco is connecting the internet of everything. I just think its better to work with someone. Someone you feel you can really partner with. Unfortunately, ive found that some
Brokerage Firms<\/a> dont always encourage that kind of relationship. Thats why i stopped working at the old brokerage, and started working for charles schwab. Avo what kind of
Financial Consultant<\/a> are you looking for . Talk to us today. Thats a good thing, but it doesnt cover everything. Only about 80 of your part b medical expenses. The rest is up to you. So consider an aarp
Medicare Supplement<\/a> insurance plan, insured by unitedhealthcare insurance company. Like all standardized
Medicare Supplement<\/a> insurance plans, they could save you in outofpocket medical costs. Call today to request a free decision guide. With these types of plans, youll be able to visit any doctor or hospital that accepts medicare patients. Plus, there are no networks, and virtually no referrals needed. Join the millions who have already enrolled in the only
Medicare Supplement<\/a> insurance plans endorsed by aarp. And provided by unitedhealthcare insurance company, which has over 30 years of experience behind it. With all the good years ahead, look for the experience and commitment to go the distance with you. Call now to request your free decision guide. So crazy right now, most incredibly welcome back to squawk on the street. We have breaking data from the floor of the cme group. We have negative 0. 1 on production. We were expecting a plus 0. 2. Last month was plus 0. 6. Capacity 78. 1, we were expecting 78. 3. Again, its not that great of data. Hopefully we reflecting some of whats gone on in the government shutdown. Bond market stays where it is, yields are hovering around 2. 7 in the 10year. I think bad news to them still means no taper, but this is probably not bad enough to chang the way theyre thinking today. Back to you, kelly. Jim, thank you very much, sir. Just trying to take a little closer look here. Important last month given the bump from utility production is going to be whether its that unwind or whats happening with the manufacturing piece of it in particular. Well take a look into it. In the meantime, shares of fedex rising premarket, as paulsen, loeb and soros disclosing stakes in fedex. It was great. We meet with shareholders all the time. So there want anything unusual about that. And dan loeb asked if he could come down and bring a couple of analysts. They bought some shares and it was a lot of fun. Theyre very smart people. A lot of fun, very smart people. But to what extent is this really about that group of people deciding that theyre going to do something active in fedex . I mean, it doesnt appear listen, what i find these days in particular given activism has run rampant, you will get guys in stocks and then they try to encourage some of the bigger name activists to get involved. I think that was a potential here in fedex. Ive been hearing the name a lot in activist circles. Loeb got in there but apparently is not going to be active, is going to be passive and along with these other big names. But there is, jim, interestingly an activist case to be made here. Its when you look at the differences between fedex and how its run and ups, its main competitor. Many argue even who own the stock nfedex is very cheap but its run as a plane company. They dont lease their planes, they own them. They have 280 planes in the
United States<\/a> versus 150 for ups. They make most of their money on ground, not on express. When you look at the 400 to 1,200 mile delivery, they are 21 using planes at fedex versus ups. Ups has 10 billion more in revenue, 50 billion more in market cap. And so there is an argument there and it will be interesting to see if that picks up any steam and whether they just go and perhaps do a big dividend to keep everybody placated. I didnt know that. I am a much bigger believer in scott davis and ups. I did not know about all that opportunity for fedex. I just know that fedex did a restructuring when the stock was in the 80s and its been a magnificent performer. Sometimes i wish the activists sorry to beat a dead horse here but a cisco, a big cap company doing nothing. They go after fedex theyre not. There are people that see opportunities and think you could. Missed fact there. But at this point thing about names are not making an activist play and very well may not, although there may be one to make an argument that youre running it like a plane company, not logistics company. When fred smith sat down with them, hes a reasonable man. Hes an economist. He does own 20 million shares, too, not to be forgot i dont know forgotten. Hes very good. I think of all the terrible companies out there, all the companies where if we had different management, there could be some greatness. Where are the agitators . Why not look at it and say theres value to be unlocked . The agitators i think are taken aback. Its not necessarily a turn around. If youre an activist, you may not want to get involved in a turn around thats going to take years, you may change allocation to capital in some way thats going to result in a real positive. Thats another side of it. True alchemy . Conceivably. Last night i put mr. Jefferies from abercrombie and finch on my wall of shame. I think if an activist came in and replaced him, hes 69, his contracts not up, i think theres value there. Sometimes people overstay. People do overstay their welcome and boards are very forgiving. Got to go out on top. Got to know when to walk away. Coming up next, cramers mad dash. Well hear what he has to say about several stocks under the l lens this morning. Dow is about 25, shrugging off the industrial data. The manufacturing piece of it was more positive. More squawk on the street from the
New York Stock Exchange<\/a> straight ahead. Welcome back. How is everything . Theres nothing like being your own boss and my customers are really liking your flat rate shipping. Fedex one rate. Really makes my life easier. Maybe a promotion is in order. Good news. I got a new title. And a raise . Management couldnt make that happen. [ male announcer ] introducing fedex one rate. Simple, flat rate shipping with the reliability of fedex. A lot can happen in a second. With fidelitys guaranteed onesecond trade execution, we route your order to up to 75
Market Centers<\/a> to look for the best possible price maybe even better than you expected. Its all part of our goal to execute your trade in one second. Im derrick chan of fidelity investments. Our onesecond trade execution is one more innovative reason serious investors are choosing fidelity. Now get 200 free trades when you open an account. I like to dream, yes between the sound machine all right, seven minutes till the opening bell. Its friday. Im happy its friday. Im not sure why steppenwolf played a role this. Lets talk ge. Lets do it. Ge doing another pro
Shareholder Equity<\/a> offer. Conceivably. Were talking about their north american
Retail Finance<\/a> business, things like private label credit cards. We did get some sense of this in the news reports from a few weeks back. Theyre going to spin off or i should say issue up to 20 of the equity in an initial public offering. That will be done next year most likely. Then a full split off by 2015. Some people want that. Of this business. Some people want remember capital one has been a total winner. You get these credit card plays, people are very excited about them. Visa disappoint, mastercard, those are different kind of credit cards. This could be something who want a new finance name might go to. Parting ways by 2015. Lets move on to exxon mobil. This is
Warren Buffett<\/a> taking his biggest position since ibm. I had been a big derider of exxon hoping they would show production growth. This last quarter was a good quarter for exxon. A 2. 7 yield, this company is a longrange thinking, it hasnt really monetized xto yet, the natural gas company, theyve not been in favor of using natural gas as a surface fuel. I think when they change their mind, the stock will go higher. I think this is a very well company that no one, im going to use the phrase, ever got hurt owning. People run into the shares because
Warren Buffett<\/a> owns it . Oh, geez, stop it. That makes no sense at all. My charitable stock owns wells fargo and im like were not selling it because
Warren Buffett<\/a> owns it and shes like, jim, how about some rigger. Stay with us right here on squawk on the street. [ male announcer ] what if a
Small Company<\/a> became big business overnight . Like, really big. Then expanded . Or their new product tanked . Or not . What if they embrace new technology instead . Imagine a companys future with the future of trading. Company profile. A
Research Tool<\/a> on thinkorswim. From td ameritrade. You are watching cnbc squawk on the street live from the
Financial Capital<\/a> of the world. We got the opening bell set to ring in about 30 seconds. Whats key to this market . Lumber liquidators, 27 cents short. I think the key to this market is kimberly clark. Really . There are nine analysts who follow it, major firms. Six had a hold, three had a sell, a very vocal sell. Mr. Faulk, the great ceo, comes out and says listen, the last downgrade was at 93, look at the stock, youre talking about 113, 112 stock. Thats a bond market equivalent. Everyone said when taper turns, it going to crush them. Mr. Faulk is saying were a living, breathing organism here. You may think all we are is a bond market equivalent. All we can do is break the company up. What is going on when they break the company up, david . Shrinking to grow thats the key. Pfizer was the key to the market. And you know what drug that was. Yes, i do. It was viagra. It was viagra lets ring the opening bell, shall we . Were about to hear the applause and get that opening bell. And here at the big board were going to have ace, a transaction management platform. Over at the nasdaq, zulily, a
Childrens Clothing<\/a> web site. Initial offering today. Its a very exciting site and it will be a very exciting deal. A little bit more green on the board. The tmobile deal is holding at 25. Thats important to point out. We didnt really get to that. We knew it was about a 2 billion offering of stock to raise capital for the company. Ostensibly to use for spectrum, though theyre not participating in the why doesnt google buy them, david . Its an interesting question. Doesnt google want to be all things . There is growing discussion in the industry that to the extent google needs control, all you want is to have people use as much use their devices as much as possible, in as many ways as possible, would google conceivably do that . They bought spectrum. Would they actually buy an operator . You cant rule it out, especially they also have a manufacturer of handsets. Lets not forget motorola. I guess how you can make your case do you want to put all your chips in a phone basket . If ultimately youre about that connectivity, i can see it as a valuable asset. For google, a lot of these are side bets. Theyre not central but theyre bets on future and making sure the
Central Business<\/a> is able to continue to transform. We dont praise them enough. We talk about a lot of companies. They seem to get lost in the shuffle but they are the ultimate cloud play, social play, advertising play, theyre a very forward looking company. When you talk to younger people, where do they want to work . Not goldman, okay. Not procter. They want to work at google. Or they want to work at snapcat and get bought by google. Its a 10 billion company if they come public. In this particular environment. Everyone is going to say, jim, youre encouraging a bubble. Im not encouraging anything. Facebook, that is your digital mailbox, theres tons of data but snapcat . Do you think snapcat is words with friends . Its ephemeral . Its hard with a site like that. In anonymity is a hindrance to being able to monetize how often do you snapcat . Never. I do multiple times a day. Its how i communicate with my kids. Thats what they want. I could skype but theyre stick of me. We snapcat all the time. We go to tjx and hit the mall and go to in ordnordstroms. The play there off the cold weather were very strong. Im going to come with both deckers, because thats uggs and also b. F. Because you got north face, power house brand, erik weisman doing such a fabulous job. I like to mention vf corp. I like deckers and i like the nordstrom call and i also like tanger factory outlet. The rack is doing very well. Theyre going to have tons of inventory. To go back to the nordstrom point, is this a company that you want to buy on the weakness here and say for whatever reason they didnt, cu execute that quarter . No, because they cant deliver. Im tired of their lack of delivery when i can just go by terry lundgren. Theyre not kohls, theyre not if you go on the macys call, its really interesting. They were like we promoted correctly, we did door busters, we advertised, we executed better. Nordstrom is struggling. They offer so much service that i think it might actually hurt their margins. I want to talk about fannie and freddie. Yesterday we had
Bruce Berkowitz<\/a> on. He suggested a somewhat audacious plan under which he and a group of investors would essentially buy the
Insurance Business<\/a> from fannie and freddie leaving the legacy portfolio to run off, raising 17 billion in additional capital. I did want to tell you this morning that bill ackmans purchasing square has taken a 10 stake in the common stock of fannie and freddie. Hedge funds have been in the preferred shares. Thats where berkowitz owns and perry capital, which is suing to overturn the third amendment in which the government basically takes the profits from fannie and freddie, thats where their ownership stake is and many other hedge funds. But here it appears mr. Ackman is focused on the common, at least according to two s. E. C. Regulatory filings. He does say hes encouraged by or made the decision in light of the proposal made earlier this week by mr. Berkowitzs fairholme capital. Ackman, weve taken a lot of shots on him but on one he got right was general growth, when nobody saw it. Its up to the congress, up to senator corker. Im hearing corkers warming up to this. Berkowitz has thrown something out there saying lets do it. Here else is what he had to say yesterday. The government wants to change the future relationship of the enterprises with government sponsorship and i understand that and the government has every right to do that. But we need to respect the past, we need to respect current owners. Current owners can help give everybody what they want. This could be a win for everybody. Its what hes saying. Interesting to know, mr. Ackman now again its the common. And apparently he just bought it if hes saying its in response to the plan. The plan was
Just Announced<\/a> yesterday. Let me just ask this question because fannie and freddie is such an important and central issue to the u. S. Economy. Is this really about the future of fannie and freddie . Is this about a trade . You can make money real quick in some of these preferreds. The preferreds are up five fold. A lot of hedge funds in the preferred are already thinking about exiting. From mr. Berkowitzs point of view, hes got to stay in if hes going to have any credibility in this potential plan. We were skeptical in questioning him yesterday but hes trying to get something going. If it were
Warren Buffett<\/a> that came with that plan, it would be taken differently, dont you think . The senate would say weve got the blessing of the best investors, let turn it over to him and lets do it. If it was buffett, not berkowitz, change the name. Youd get more traction. Theres nothing wrong with that because buffett has a track record of doing things he perceives in a longterm effort. He suffered through the big downturn. Berkowitz is long term. The mans portfolio has barely changed. If you own the fairholme fund, you better be reddy for that and this and this and this. Lets go over to possible business an bob pisani. Were up section weeks in a row, the s p is up six weeks in a row. The recent record was seven week. That goes back to i think 2009 or so. So were near new record here. We havent had great volume all week, its been eh overall. Number one, the december taper trades, thats all gone. Yellen confirmed that yesterday and whats back in is the high beta names. Its out with old tech like cisco and in with new tech, yahoo zillow, yelp, groupon, priceline, amazon. Another group thats back in is real estate stocks, particularly
Home Building<\/a> stocks, the itb, thats the main etf for the
Home Builders<\/a> is up almost 5 . Thats a fiveday chart there. Thats a nice move and thats a little bit of stabilization on the
Interest Rate<\/a> side. Is there a reason to sell . I called around, asked a whole bunch of people this morning. Not right now. Everybodys gone back to being more afraid of missing the up side than getting killed on the down side. So the bottom line is right now this is still a very powerful rally and still not a lot of reasons to come out and sell. A lot of talk were still not overpriced on evaluation, 15 times forward earnings, expecting 10 growth in earnings next year. That will come down. Thomas lee raised the price target at jpmorgan, 18. 25 from 17. 75. He said we are remaining in a secular bull market. Let me mention nordstrom. Its common place to ount opoin the higher end is doing better, but the sales growth, only 2. 5 on the year. I think its down because the overall 2014 guidance for top line was a bit of a disappointment. Zulily is going to price on the nasdaq. These specialty retailers have done really well. This caters to mom. Real special niche of the markets, the retailers doing very well. Thanks very much, bob pisani. Okay. Let tell you about men as warehouse and joseph a. Bank, they say if you let us do due diligence, we might raise our bid, please, please, please. Didnt help. A hedge fund that is being an activist here, even though mr. Sandler earlier this week put a letter out that said we talked to the ceo of mens warehouse. You havent engaged with us in any discussions regarding our proposal. Byebye. The question is what is eminence going to do about it . They come out with a release that said we are now going to try to seek to have a special meeting with the shareholders. You can act by written consent but first you have to move to get an amendment to do that. So they are going to try to do that to move towards a
Consent Solicitation<\/a> to remove directors without cause before the next annual meeting. They would need 10 to even then call the meeting to try to amend the bylaws. The new
York Hedge Fund<\/a> manager would have to go down to texas. Thats a tough road. Seems like you all get along. I jest. We get along quite a bit. These companies would do well together. I have to tell you, david, i have to look at it from the fundamental side. Whether its it would be such a good idea, these two are struggling right now, joseph a. Banks in particular. This would have been a really good deal. Mens wearhouse has thus succeeded in giving them the stiff arm. Well see if these actions are successful in changing the dynamic. You have someone flailing, another guy comes in, reinvents. You have a lot of dual supply chains, a lot of overlap. It just a shame they didnt follow through here. That moneys wearhouse wouldnt open. Coming up, a mea culpa from mcdonalds, a fascinating one. And as you head into the
Holiday Season<\/a>, whats the number one wine . Stick around, youll hear one publications stop pick when squawk on the street continues. Tdd 18003452550 trading inspires your life. Tdd 18003452550 life inspires your trading. Tdd 18003452550 where others see fads. Tdd 18003452550. You see opportunities. Tdd 18003452550 at schwab, were here to help tdd 18003452550 turn inspiration into action. Tdd 18003452550 we have intuitive platforms tdd 18003452550 to help you discover whats trending. Tdd 18003452550 and seasoned market experts to help sharpen your instincts. Tdd 18003452550 so you can take charge tdd 18003452550 of your trading. Store and essentially they just get sold something. We provide the exact individualization that your body needs. Before you invest in a mattress, discover the bed clinically proven to improve sleep quality. The sleep number bed. Once you experience it, theres no going back. Final days for our lowest price ever on c4
Queen Mattress<\/a> setsjust 1299. Plus special financing until 2015. Only at one of our 425 sleep
Number Stores<\/a> nationwide. Sleep number. Comfort individualized maestro of project management. Baron of the buildout. You need a permit. To be this awesome. And you. Rent from national. Because only national lets you choose any car in the aisle. And go. You can even take a fullsize or above, and still pay the midsize price. aaron purrrfect. vo meeeow, business pro. Meeeow. Go national. Go like a pro. I got the magic in me, every time i touch that track, it turns into gold mcdonalds admitting its service has suffered as a result of trying to add too many menu items too quickly. To help rectify the situation, the fast food giant says its investing in new preparation tables that can accommodate more ingredients to help assembly and they are going to add a third drivethrough window. They have suffered, jim, since reporting those latest comps that disappointed globally. Its not cheap or easy to just throw a third window in there or even add a table. Were talking about capex. Is it worth it . Mcdonalds has structural problems. Chipotle spends year before they introduce a new menu item. Safrita, they just introduced it in baltimore. They know the throughput problems. If you have these difficult menu items, your staff cant do it. Chipotle just added five more per hour of lunches. Mcdonalds panera trying to change their menu. Arent they between a rock and the hard place . If they dont change their menu, you may not get the traffic at all, right . Yes. But these are complicated dishes in order to offset or kick the traffic back from mcdonalds. When i sat down with wendys, just the introduction of a couple new items. Yesterday i had popeyes. They only do one at a time and its hard. Mcdonalds tried to do too much. If everyone else can get it right, how does someone like mcdonalds get it wrong . Because mcdonalds is a much larger chain with not the kind of same managerial infrastructure. Chipotle brings people up, really promotes them, has team leaders, linebackers they call them, too. When they have a complicated new dish, they make sure theyre absolutely ready. Theyre doing a new chop house, an asian kitchen chop house, maybe three in washington just to get it right. Theyve had multiple years to try to get it right. Some chains are more nimble. So youre just all about chipotle. You just cant help yourself. I had afce, i had i can talk any chain you want, i can talk dine equity, applebys. Ihop . They have not been able to execute correctly. Whats the matter . Your range never ceases to amaze me. I dont have a life be beyond fantasy football. From retail to food to oil and gas. Im paid to get this stuff right. He is paid a lot of money. Thats not the point of that. I come to play every day. Not enough to buy snapcat. Snapcat ceo apparently turned down a billion dollar offer not once by twice. Hes said to have turned down googles 4 billion offer because he believes at this rate his company is growing, its going to be valued much higher down the road. Jim had some thoughts on that yesterday. So in all seriousness no, i dont think hes old enough to shave. Hes 23. So what . Hes 23. How old were the google guys. I hate that kind of talk, that a guys young. The problem is that most people are too old to run these companies. Thats really been the big reservation ive had. Doing a tax deal for google, take the stock, you run snapcat within google i dont know. We got to get to our squawk on the tweet this morning. If you could snapcat your advice to evan spiegel, what would it be, what would it say . Im doing it right now. Why do i have to tell people . I want to know what that picture is going to be. Six in 60 dont go anywhere. Well be right back. Thats mine. Come on, kyle. [ horn honks ] thats mine. Kyle. [ male announcer ] revenge is best served with 272 horses. Now get the best offers of the season. Current lessees with an expiring lease get this 2014 ats for around 299 a month. At bny mellon, our business is investments. Managing them, moving them, making them work. We oversee 20 of the worlds financial assets. And that gives us scale and insight no one else has. Investment management combined with investment servicing. Bringing the power of investments to peoples lives. Invested in the world. Bny mellon. announcer at scottrade, our cexactly how they want. T with scottrades online banking, i get one view of my bank and brokerage accounts with one login. To easily move my money when i need to. Plus, when i call my local scottrade office, i can talk to someone who knows how i trade. Because i dont trade like everybody. I trade like me. Im with scottrade. announcer scottradeproud to be ranked best overall client experience. Time for six in 60 seconds. Start withage lant. They had a good quarter last night. Lynn energy. A lot of big shorts in the name. I think theyre going to be wrong. Gogo. This is a company that
Morgan Stanley<\/a> says has gone too far. They been a winner. Pandora. A lot of people think apple is starting to kill them with their apple iradio. Amax. I have big concerns with them. Costco. Stearn says its a 144 price target. They did have the best comps of any retailer. I already know one guest you have tonight on mad money. The second one is rocket fuel. This is a programmatic buyer went public not that long ago. This man is a rocket scientist. We have to find out whether this is too expensive. You and i have been through the web, have been through internet one. We know a lot of companies that advertise in consulting and they didnt necessarily all last. There is a new model emerging absolutely in terms of advertising the web, rocket fuel is one of those names. Weve had a few of them come public lately. This is that realtime buy. The multiples are huge on sales, not earnings. A boy has got to be skeptical. And jack jacks great. Youll be out on monday, correct . Then im coming back tuesday. Red eye, red eye. Red eye, red eye. A lot of that. Well were still waiting for zulily to open for trading. Well to the companys ceo coming up. My customers can shop around. But it doesnt usually work that way with health care. With unitedhealthcare, i get information on quality rated doctors,
Treatment Options<\/a> and cost estimates, so we can make
Better Health<\/a> decisions. Thats health in numbers. Unitedhealthcare. Welcome back to squawk on the street. Th we have broken the streak of slightly disappointing data today. Whole sale as expected plus 0. 4, prior week was revised hirer to 0. 8 po 0. 5. Who wholesale was revised down a bit. This is good news. None of these numbers were huge live relevant but together they were making a bad scenario. Who wholesale inventory is important. It reflects demand. The stock market has stayed where it is, 10year yield still sticking around 2. 7 so no big move either way. Back to you, kelly. Nosing toward 1,800 there on the s p. Jim, thank you, sir. Helping to support u. S. Indexes this morning is whats happening as well in asia. Weve got strong rallies shaping up in japan but also in china, thanks shaping up there. Eunice, people are describing this as the boldest set of reforms weve had in decades. Is that overstated . Reporter no, no, its not overstated. This is major news. This comes after the china leaders held a closed door fourday meeting earlier this week. The details of that document have been published in the state press and they are big. For investors, they said the government plans to liberalize the
Financial Sector<\/a>, beijing will allow the markets to play a bigger role in setting
Interest Rate<\/a>s, the government said it would allow privately owned banks, ease curves on individuals who want to invest overseas, set up a deposit insurance system. They are allowing the proflizatiprof professionalization of the
Banking Sector<\/a>. They said they would pull out all the stops on financial reform. One other thing people were concerned about this week was the role of the state. The government today signaling the states role will be reduced. They said private capital will be allowed to participate in projects with stateowned enterprises, theyre going to end some of the state monopolies and allow the markets to have greater say in prices on commodities like water, oil, electricity and telecommunications. In terms of
Foreign Investment<\/a>, they specifically said they would relax the curbs on elderly care for
Foreign Investment<\/a> as well as ecommerce. This is really, really big. Just to go a step further, does the fact that its changing so quickly after years and years of criticism that china has been moving too slowly indicate to you the leadership feels more under pressure than perhaps we had previously realized . Absolutely we feel it indicates theyre been under pressure. Theyve been under pressure to reboot the
Economic Growth<\/a> here. Of course we dont have any time frames exactly on what you know, theyre going to be reforming the house hold registration system, which has been slowing the pace of urbanization and relaxing the one child policy, which has been another key factor and people have been very concerned about it hampering
Economic Growth<\/a> in the future. Mega reforms that could play out or pay dividends in the years to come. Eunice yoon, thanks so much. President obama is set to meet with
Health Insurance<\/a> ceos today. John harwood with more. John . Reporter this is a huge mess. The administration is trying to do what it can to minimize the damage of that. Thats the fix that the president announced today isnt likely to have a huge effect on the
Insurance Market<\/a> because most states and
Insurance Companies<\/a> want to move on to the new standard theyve set, but the administration felt the need to deflect some of the heat that was coming on to themselves and to
Congressional Democrats<\/a> who vote today on a plan by republicans that would purport to fix the law but democrats believe it would gut the law by allowing new customers to come on to the individual market. The president will meet with those insurance executives this afternoon. Hell be taking some fire from them. They were criticizing his plan, the one industry source telling me yesterday this plan is a joke that just deflects blame on to the
Insurance Companies<\/a>. I would expect the administration to try to tell the
Insurance Companies<\/a> that they will give them a little bit of a break on what they call the risk provisions of the obama care law, maybe some the loss ratio payouts which companies are required to make to absorb whatever financial damage they take as a result of the extension of these policies, but i wouldnt expect a lot of them to be extended and really, guys, the most important thing for all of this is getting that web site working because thats where the administration believes people will discover in much larger numbers than they do right now that theyre coming out ahead under the plan as opposed to only hearing from the people who are losers, which is what the country is hearing right now. I mean, of course, john, the key here it seems as though theyve added another layer of potential complexity to an already difficult situation in terms of the changes the president is trying to make here, which wouldnt seem to do anything toward the ultimate goal to get people signed up, particularly the young, the ones you want to be signed up as opposed to the infirmed or those who are not great risks. No question. And because of that very complexity, the difficulty of doing this, thats why i think that not many people are going to do it. Remember states have had the ability to extend plans into 2014. What the president was offering by way of flexibility yesterday is that some of those states that want to do that can extend some of those plans as late as the end of december 2015. But so many
Insurance Companies<\/a> in states want to move on to the new world that theyre facing, the extension of a few months may not provide that much relief to people on the individual market. So thats why i expect when we look back at what happened yesterday, it will be seen as more of a political gesture than a substantive change to the situation. John harwood, thank you. We want to stay with this story and ask what the best strategy is for resolving the
Governments Health<\/a> care difficulties. John engate joins us now. Good morning. Good morning. First of all, you have heard from the administration at all on this . We have not worked with them at all. Weve been paying attention to it and weve seen a lot of the changes behind the scenes that weve heard about but we havent really been involved directly. When we asked you plim errol where health care p prelimina it was a short time frame. Thats hard for anyone to accomplish, with lots of moving parts within the government. I dont know if anyone in the u. S. Could have done necessarily a better job with this. It a very short timeline with a very complex challenge. Lets go over some of the complexities here and the likelihood that you would place on the administration able to get this up and running by the end of the month. It looks like its getting better. I dont know if the end of the month is something they can necessarily achieve because they have so many challenges ahead of them. It does seem to be getting somewhat better. I tried it out last night myself, i got a lot further through the process than i did originally, but that doesnt mean that it necessarily works at scale. My one experience doesnt necessarily extrapolate to the entire population. They have a tough challenge still ahead and a tight timeline. If you were to change a couple of things, would it be about the design or is it what seems like an interface but have to go through an incredibly complex series of checks through many
Government Agencies<\/a> . I its all of the above. I think there were some coding problems. I think the massive challenge is the integration of hundreds of
Different Companies<\/a> and agencies across the
United States<\/a>. You have hundreds of moving parts here you have to look up data in hundreds of databases and that all has to happen in realtime. It especially challenging when you dont have control of those databases. Theyre spread across a wide number of entities. Its a difficult challenge. Is that why the states that seem to have set up exchanges have done so much better . I would guess thats the case. Theyre working with lots fewer sets of data sources, they control a lot more of the endtoend processing thats going on. Its a much simpler process for the state. Theyve got all the data about their residence, they have control over their data sources. They dont have to work across different agencies and different entities across the country. Finally, is that any model, if the government can get this centralized web site to work, is there any way it could delegate more . I think thats certainly an option. The idea that a state is in charge of their own destiny is probably something that we should look at as a future model for this kind of health care exchange. All right. John engates is the ceo over at rackspace. Thank you. Mcdonald admits it has suffered from trying to expand its menu too quickly. Is this just the tip of a supersized problem . Well be right back. Bny mellon combines
Investment Management<\/a> investment servicing, giving us unique insights which help us attract the industrys brightest minds who create powerful strategies for a countrys investments which are used to build new schools to build more bright minds. Invested in the world. Bny mellon. After receiving customer complaints about slow service, mcdonalds is adding a third drivethrough window to new and renovated stores. Has it forgotten its fast food
Business Model<\/a> and made strategic errors here . Jim, is this about just weakness in mcdonalds core
Customer Base<\/a> or is it and to this point weve gotten some tweets and emails in the past hour talking about this story, is it that their mine has become too confusing . I think the biggest problem with mcdonalds is they tried to do too much. They see this core business as probably not going and more of the growth in the socalled more affluent and theyre trying to offer
Premium Products<\/a> and i think therefore, the menu has grown too big. I think the only way they can really grow is try to expand their accessibility, convenience and store front and they want to continue to drive traffic through the drivethrough. So thats what they are looking to grow. It is interesting. We should know you have a hold on the shares, 108 price target over 12month period. As much as their problem was trying to do too much, is their fix also trying to do too much . In other words, could they just focus on the fact they have too many menu items or they need to distribute them more quickly or do they need to address them on all front is it. I think its best right now to execute, not try to introduce new products. Right now the current environment is not conducive to new innovations and new products but more trying to execute and serve well. I think about customers, i think of three factors why they pick a certain restaurant. One is price, second is product but third is convenience. Given the fact the first two is very competitive environment, i think they should focus on vying to be more convenient. They need to focus tactically and longer term strategically address how they want to folks on the growth era, the millennium generation, which i believe prefer restaurants other than mcdonalds. Is there a way to measure traffic . You can measure how many people in the lines. You see people wait in line, it too long and they leave. How expensive is this fix going to be . Adding a third window is a big deal for some of these locations. Theyre in the processing of reimaging also the new restaurants. Its part of their
Capital Expenditures<\/a> and i think this is probably needed. It within their budget and i think thats what they need. So the answer is it does pay for itself and i think its positive. Jim, will these moves help you turn more positive on the shares or does it ultimately come down to macro . I think its mostly macro. I think right now mcdonalds is more tied to the economic environment and is hurt more because the core consumers are not doing as well. And the ones that are doing well are more affluent and they prefer the fast cash uls. Right now we have a buy recommendation on starbucks. They continue to introduce new products and gain market share also in the breakfast and also in the lunch area. Thank you, jim, were showing some of the other pick there is as well. Have a great day. Thank you for your time. Thank you. Up next, a phone that can do something that no other phone can do. What is it . Well tell you and show you right after the break. train horn vo wherever our trains go, the economy comes to life. Norfolk southern. One line, infinite possibilities. How old is the oldest person youve known . We gave people a sticker and had them show us. We learned a lot of us have known someone whos lived well into their 90s. And thats a great thing. But even though were living longer, one thing that hasnt changed much is the official retirement age. The question is how do you make sure you have the money you need to enjoy all of these years. To enjoy all of these years. Sometimes they just drop in. Always obvious. Cme group can help you navigate risks and capture opportunities. We enable you to reach
Global Markets<\/a> and drive forward with broader possibilities. Cme group how the world advances. Welcome back. Lets get straight over to dominic chu for a quick market flash here. Amr announcing it will list the combined company of the
American Airlines<\/a> and usair ways as
American Airlines<\/a> group and both stocks are down on those opening trades. Thanks, dom. Samsung may have beat apple in the cell phone but lg has the curved flex phone. This is pretty cool. Im going to put this next to this gold iphone so you can really see how its curved. Sixinch screen. So its a really big phone. But it doesnt feel as big in your pocket because it actually curves with your leg. But heres the kind of freaky thing about this phone. This is insane. Plastic screen, still high resolution, so you can actually sit on it or smash it down dont try this at home, folks. Your phone cannot do this and survive. Its going to be a highend phone, probably the equivalent right now, selling in korea for about 1,000, unsubsidized. When you consider this is a flagship, its got some unique features, it really shows how a lot of phone makers are trying to entice the high end of the smartphone market. Last week we heard from qualcomm, telling us theres a lowdown at the high end of the market. Its not just cosmetic. When you get a curve in the phone, stretches out the light rays, should give a better viewing experience when you dont have the light bouncing back as much. Why arent they selling them by the dozen yet . Theres little sticker on the back of the phone. They dont want to advertise which carrier will carry this. They said at the beginning of 2014 this will come out. It is out in korea. We are the first to get a look at this phone outside of lg. Theres only four of them . Four of them. We have two of them. We have 50 of the market. Is that enough to differentiate that i would want to buy an lg over a samsung or apple . It depends. The power button is on the back. Samsung is spends on marketing. It going to be tough to lg to break through all that. Weve seen a lot of other companies not able to make money. They need an innovation that catches peoples eyes. I wouldnt put that in my pant pocket anyway. Its too big. I did put it in my pant pocket and oddly enough, it doesnt the edges dont stick out as much because it curves. This phone is too big for me to carry around day to day, im constantly taking this out, sending emails. I would throw it up in the air, testing its durability, just say. But there a lot of folks who like these big phones, analysts looking at spreadsheets and stuff like that, people with big hands, bigger than mine. Didnt samsung or apple file a patent for curved technology . Seeing this, though, the fact they already have it out here and that its not just curved glass that, it does have these nonbreakable properties, it would suggest either you get on board with this or by the time people have it, people will be over it . Its led, it palalastic on t front, it high pixel density, it bright. Well see how they display it in stores. If they can convince people its different enough they want to show it off to their friends. You enjoy it. I dont know if theyll let me take it far from the stock exchange. Fascinating. Snapcat ceo reportedly turning down an offer to buy not once but twice. When we spoke to him in november, this what he had to say about monetization. If you could snap chap your advice to evan spiegel, what would it look like, what would it say . [ male announcer ] every thought. Every movement. Carefully planned, coordinated and synchronized. Performing together with a single, united purpose. Thats what makes the worlds leading airline. Flyer friendly. One hour till trading. Here are some of the stories were squawking about. The smartphone wars are heating up ahead of the
Holiday Season<\/a>. Samsung sold almost three times as many smartphones as apple in the third quarter. Plus mcdonalds says its sorry for the bad service. The president of mcdonalds usa said the company added too many menu items too quickly. And a record medallion price for handicap accessible caps, the record bid, a whoting 2d. 5 million for a fair of medallions in in 2008, a pair of medallions for a handicap cab went for half that. Compared to 2008, it not just art or pink diamonds, it tacky cab medallions benefiting from the rebound . They rarely get hurt, even in recession. Even with the new asset class. Were talking about new highs in the dow, the s p 500, the nasdaq back towards that 4,000 level. What does the fed do under its incoming chairman janet yellen . Lets ask our guests. Guys, good morning. Good morning. Doug, first to you. We just saw jpmorgan raise its year end price target to 1825 here. A lot of people will say were staring down the barrel of 1,800. Is that psychologically significant . What else does that tell you about sentiment here . I think there is a psychological level there. I think in the end a lot of investors, at least the ones we talk to, spent a little too much time on the sidelines and have doubted the rally because they maybe philosophically disagree with whats happening in washington or at the federal reserve. In the end it doesnt matter, the market is going to do what its going to do. We look at a u. S. Market thats reasonably priced. Its not expensive, not excessively cheap. Its a fair deal. As you come into a period of seasonal strength, the november to may period, this is the time where trends should probably continue to do pretty well. Were fully invested and enjoying the ride right now. There was a prizing amount of bubble talk with janet yellen. I know you look at a broad c constellation here and i wonder do things look sloppy to you . The string in equities owes much to very low
Interest Rate<\/a>s. The bond yields moving higher. I dont think that the equity market will come under much pressure from significantly higher
Interest Rate<\/a>s any time soon. For other asset classes, high yield bonds. High yield bond spread right now is close to its median of the previous two economic recoveries. From that perspective, you cant say that
Corporate Bonds<\/a> are overvalued. But if
Corporate Bonds<\/a> are overvalued, it not because defaults or problems with corporate
Debt Repayment<\/a> are going to rise. Corporate bonds are overvalued from the perspective of an overvalued treasury bond market. Isnt it demand for credit thats driving a lot of the performance were seeing, spilling over into equity . This does seem to put us in the middle of the another credit boom. Do you agree with that and how do you trade that in the months to come . If you keep rates low, youre pushing investors out on the yield curve. If im an investor and i can no longer supplement my income and retire on what im getting on the bond market, i have to go out a little further. Those folks are finding their way to the equity market. Utilities, some of the telecom where weve really seen the
Bond Investors<\/a> go and hide in those areas in the equity market. Theyre a lot less attractive for that reason. I want to go back to financials as well, john. So important for
Broader Market<\/a> sentiment. Moodys down grading some of the banks yesterday saying they are in fact too big to fail. What do you see for the financials . Are they going to have a rougher go of it . Theyre holding up quite well today. They still have worries because of reduced revenue growth. Weve had this drop in mortgagerelated revenues. Theres a deep 60 yeartoyear drop by applications for mortgage refinances. You made a very good point and that is, again, too big to fail, what this deals with are junior debt holders of bank debt. They are the ones now that face greater risk. The banks themselves, the depositors, would still be bailed out in the event of a severe stress scenario. Could i add whats been overlooked among these downgrades is that moodys upgraded the standalone
Bank Strength<\/a> rating of two banks yesterday. I believe its bank of america and citibank. Thats because of improved capitalization. Sure. And its also because of the fact that we have a better handle on what their liabilities might be in terms of previous mortgagerelated matters. And would you then expect, john, that these companies, which for years traded below book value now are getting back toward hysterical valuations will return and return back to the bund . I dont think were going to go back to the bund. The valuations are not going to be as rich as they were in 2006 but i suppose theres room for improvement. But let me give you an impression as to how the credit market looks at banks today versus 2006. Today investors demand between 70 and 110 to ensure insurance 10,000 in bank debt. Investors settled for 15 to 20 to insure 10,000 in bank debt in 2006. Its unlikely real return to the multiples. Sure. Well return to you in 2016. Lets send it back to dominic for a quick market flash. Warren buffett has disclosed a 40. 1 million share in oil giant exxon. It was disclosed as of the end of september. The bulk of that stake was built up in the
Second Quarter<\/a>, 31 million shares that were not disclosed in the
Second Quarter<\/a> filing due to a special exemption that berkshire gets from regulators. They also disclosed a lightening of its conocophillips stake last quarter. He does get a lot of time to build up those positions at berkshires. The insurance citys tainduse on president obamas health care. The ceo of ehealth will join us after the break. In a world thats changing faster than ever, we believe outshining the competition tomorrow requires challenging your
Business Inside<\/a> and out today. At cognizant, we help forwardlooking
Companies Run<\/a> better and run different to give your customers every reason to keep looking for you. So if youre ready to see opportunities and see them through, we say lets get to work. Because the future belongs to those who challenge the present. Cant find a better way president
Obama Meeting<\/a> with
Health Care Ceos<\/a> today to discuss how to fix the rollout of healthcare. Gov. Another online
Health Insurance<\/a> exchange is ehealth. The president and ceo of ehealth is gary lauer. Good morning. How long is it going to get this thing right in your opinion . I dont know. Theyre going to get it working. The question is going to be how effectively does it work . Were at the point here where enrollment is critically important for the success and failure of this legislation. I cant urge the administration and others enough to start to utilize the public sector, that there are proven, tested companies out there like my company that can help to get people enrolled. The private sector is what youre saying. How would you go about trying to help with the rollout of healthcare. Gov . There are
Companies Like<\/a> mine and others that have been online for years and year of doing this. Weve been compared to the amazon. Com of
Health Insurance<\/a>. We enrolled more individuals in the month of october than all the
Government Entities<\/a> combined. All of a sudden youve doubled it. We need something important to happen, which is that for lower income, subsidized individuals, we need to connect to the federal data hub to get coverage. Tease thats a big part of whats into the working and these are many of the people being left behind. And we have to get them in the enrollment ranks, especially younger people, between 18 to 24 years of age. Earlier i was speaking with another guest. The state exchanges seem to have done a much better job. Is that simply because the level of complexity is that much less or were they better prepared . Well, i think on a relative basis theyre better. But, again, if you look at total enrollment, it way, way too low. Its just not going to work at this rate. It good these state exchanges are getting people through the process, but we need a heck of a lot more going through. We need young people in here. Young people want to do this online at 1 00 in the morning when they feel like it. They dont want to use a call center or paper. For example, in the month of october of the individuals that we saw come to ehealth, well over 40 were between 18 and 34 years of age. Weve got to get government to embrace the private sector, get a
Public Private<\/a> partnership going to save the legislation. This approach to health care was supposed to make it so it was bringing the private sector more into the fold than doing any kind of single payor model, for example. Im curious, as you say, your web site functions like an amazon. Com. But what the government is tasked with doing is doublechecking peoples
Social Security<\/a> histories, their tax records. Its all of those complex pieces of information that are going to come from agencies the problem as opposed to the ecommerce part of it. Where the government has fallen down is they havent gotten people through the doorway to go through that complex part. We have to get more people to the door, to the front end and we have to do it soon. All of this is overshadowed by the president s announcement yesterday about cancellations, but the real fundamental issue is enrollment. This legislation succeeds or fails based on enrollment alone. Weve got to get more private sector help in here right now. There is a hope it will follow along the timetable the part d launch of medicare did in 2005. It was a mess, perhaps not quite as much archmess as this is. But then they did get it together. It took a long time for seniors to stand what was going on. Now people seem relatively happy with it, whether or not you consider it an entitlement we cant pay for is another issue. Thats a good example. I will tell you with
Medicare Part<\/a> d and other medicare products, the vast majority of those, the enrollment happens outside of government. It happens for private sector entities. Weve got to be doing the same thing with obama care. Government cant do this alone and government is proving that right now. Im not expecting much to change then, right. Are you . Well, im going to keep pushing because im a supporter of the
Affordable Care<\/a> act, i want this darn thing to succeed and enrollment is the key to success right now. With the change in the cancellation issue that we heard about, it makes enrollment even more important. A lot of these people potentially being cancelled were counted on as being the new enrollees. If theyre going to be able to keep the product that they have, theyre not going to be new enrollees so theyll have to go out and get even more. Gary, appreciate your time. Gary lauer. Thank you so much. Coming up, youre looking at the number one bottle of wine in the world. Its identity is still a secret. But coming up were going toto unwrap it and tell you exactly what it is. Davids going to have a taste when we come back. All right. [ male announcer ] more room in economy plus. More comfort, more of what you need. Thats. Built around you friendly. Thats. Built around you friendly. You get your coffee here. You get your hair cut here. You find that certain thing you were looking for here, but actually you get so much more. When you shop at these small local businesses, you support all the things that make your community great. The money you spend here, stays here. In this place you call your neighborhood. Small business saturday is november 30th. Get out and shop small. Ask me what its like to get your best nights sleep every night. [announcer] why not talk to someone whos sleeping on the most highly recommended bed in america . Ask me about my tempurpedic. Ask me how fast i fall asleep. Ask me about staying asleep. [announcer] tempurpedic owners are more satisfied than owners of any traditional mattress brand. Tempurpedic. The most highly recommended bed in america. Now sleep cooler with extra cooling comfort on our bestselling tempurbreeze beds. Visit tempurpedic. Com to learn more, and find a retailer near you. Welcome back, and just in time for the holidays, were taking a look at one potential housewarming gift for you. Could it be a vintage chardonnay, an american pinot noir or sauvignon, so which fermented grapes have swirled to the top . Tom matthews joins us now, wine spectators executive editor with a big reveal. Welcome. Thank you so much. Great to be here. This is a fourcriteria process, correct . Yes. Explain what goes into picking a top wine. Out of 20,000, its hard to boil it down to one. We look at quality first. Thats the score. We look at value. Thats the price. So theres, like, the fundamentals in the stock market. We look at availability, because its harder to make a lot of great wine than just a little bit. And then theres the emotional factor, the x factor, what got us excited. What have been a couple of the past winners, and how important after you deem them top wines you see a flowthrough . They sell out immediately. Last year, it was california, relentless from schafer, beautiful sirab blend, weve done bordeaux, italians, but this is a first. Now, weve got to know what it is. We havent seen it yet. Nobody has. The worldwide reveal. Wine spectators numberone wine of the year is from spain. From riojas. Always my favorite. This is a first, right . Very first time for spain. And really, this is a balance between the ultramodern california style and the traditional burgundy or tuscany. It has 95 point, classic rating. Only 63. Very available. Not anymore. And it finds that road with tradition that i think people want to drink these days. Have the prices just gone up on the 4,000 cases made up . Thats your job oh, come on, i imagine it has influence in the market. It definitely has influence. And it sells out immediately. So leave that one behind, please . This wine was reviewed a couple of months ago, so the people that saw it and jumped on it are now sitting pretty. Where are we in terms of wine consumption right now and affordability . 63 bucks doesnt seem to our audience, it may not be that much, certainly willing, but many people dont want to pay that much. Can you get a good bottle for 15 . You can. I spend 15 most times in a retail store. Can you find a very good 88, 89 point bottle for that price. And americans are wine consumption has increased every decade, and end points are strong, california is strong. Wine production has got to have increased quickly, if not more quickly. I feel like every time im driving across the country, new vineyards are popping up left or right, in states you never would have thought. All 50 states are making wine. What impact is that having . Are more american wines good wines . Or is there just more of it . Well, i think theres both. Buff i think americans are embracing wine as part of their lifestyle. They want good food. They want something nice to drink with it. They want to travel to noise plays, high achievers, like your viewers, and they want the good life. Mm, well, ive always wanted to go visit rioja. A beautiful region. 19th century winery, still in the family hands, five generations, and really doing it right. They grow mostly their grapes, very careful about the winemaking, and just hardworking people. Will this have an impact on the group stocks, like riojas become more popular . Rioja tends to be a very good value. You can get one for 15. And you can hardly pay more than 100, so a lot of value to be found there. Great stuff. Thank you very much for coming by. Yeah, we might have to crack that one open im not sure hes going to let us. Thanks, tom. Snapchat ceo reportedly turned down a multibillion dollar offer not once, but twice. Google apparently bid 4 billion, at least according to reports for snapchat, and outbid facebooks offer, which was 3 billion. Spiegel supposedly turned down googles 4 billion offer because he believed at the rate his companys growing, it will be valued much higher down the road. So heres the snapchat ceo, what he had to say about that and the growth that his company has had, last month. Right now, we think the company is in the adolescent, so its creating a product that people love to use and monetizing that further down the road. All right. Now, all of that brings us to this mornings squawk on the tweet. If you could snapchat your advice to evan spiegel, tweet us. At faabout insurance. Ou smarr because what you dont know, can hurt you. What if you didnt know that posting your travel plans online may attract burglars . [woman] off to hawaii what if you didnt know that as the price of gold rises, so should the coverage on your jewelry . [prospector] ahh what if you didnt know that kitty litter can help you out of a slippery situation . The more you know, the better you can plan for whats ahead. Talk to farmers and get smarter about your insurance. We are farmers bum pa dum, bum bum bum bum at bny mellon, our business is investments. Managing them, moving them, making them work. We oversee 20 of the worlds financial assets. And that gives us scale and insight no one else has. Investment management combined with investment servicing. Bringing the power of investments to peoples lives. Invested in the world. Bny mellon. vo you are a business pro. Maestro of project management. Baron of the buildout. You need a permit. To be this awesome. And you. Rent from national. Because only national lets you choose any car in the aisle. And go. You can even take a fullsize or above, and still pay the midsize price. aaron purrrfect. vo meeeow, business pro. Meeeow. Go national. Go like a pro. Lets get to it. It is time to squawk on the tweet. Facebook and now google reportedly shooting down snapchat on their multi or being shot down, i should say. In any case, lets get to the squawk on the tweet. If you could a snapchat your advice to evan spiegel about what to do at the company, what would it say . Chris tweet, dont let google steal your fire. Rick tweet, sage advice from the steve miller band, take the money and run. And bobby tweets, have a snapchat from myspace to remind him how quickly teens change their minds. Myspace is a great example. Its funny. Jon fortt joins us. I remember there was a point at which news corps owned it, they were trying to swap it into yahoo thats how valuable they felt it was at the time. And then they sold it for nothing, 300 million bucks. Yeah, the value snapchatted away. Even though it sounds crazy, when somebody offers to buy a zero revenue startup for billions, dont forget instagram. That will probably go down as smart as youtube googles acquisition of youtube for 1. 65 billion years ago, because if theyre willing to pay 3 billion for snapchat now, theyd be paying 5 billion for insta many g instagram and not dissimilar. Youre talking about two that are hits with young people. Photos go away, so theyll have to have a challenge monetizing that for the long term. People dont want their data retained if theyre using snapchat. But maybe theres a way. People figure out all kinds of things. That is a very good point. Instagram is almost like a twitterlike service, but pictures, and put a
Community Around<\/a> it, how do you create one when nothing stays, when its all gone . Thats going to plague them. Jon, stick around. David, great to see you. Kelly were going to keep an eye on fannie and freddie, the calm and preferred. Have a good weekend. Heres what you missed if youre just tuning in. Announcer welcome to squawk on the street. Heres whats happened so far. You dont just push a button and make this happen. Theres a lot of work to be done, but we think we can reinstate our policyholders. The economy is not strong. Its not strong, because we dont have progrowth policies in terms of taxes and trade, and the centerpiece of that is reforming the tax code to incent more business investment. Theres not a lot of supply coming in despite stocks rally. Thats highly unusual. Its indicative of what happens at the end of the year when people dont want to show that theyre not 100 long. Sorry about the double negative. [ bell sounds ] whats the matter . Its just incredible. Your range . No, the it never ceases it never ceases to amaze i dont have a life beyond this and fantasy football. Well, i know that. I dont know if the end of the month is something they can necessarily achieve, because theyve got so many challenges ahead of them. But, i mean, it does seem to be getting somewhat better. I tried it out last night myself. I got a lot further through the process than i did originally. What they have said is the beginning of 2014, it will come to the u. S. Boy, this literally came out in korea. This week, we are the first to get a look at this phone outside of l. G. Good morning, were live here at post 9 at the
New York Stock Exchange<\/a> on a friday, and lets begin with a check on market, as were nearing key levels for several of the indexes now. The dow edging closer to 16,000, at 15,929 this morning. Its up about. 3 , leading the majors, in fact. The s p 500 adding. 2 , as it nears 1,800. The nasdaq trying to reclaim the 4,000 mark, as its up just barely positive in this trading session today, though. Now, shares of mens wearhouse rallying. The company said it would consider a new bid if invited by mens wearhouse to discuss such a deal. The shares are up about 1 . And shares of linkedin are rallying. Stifel, nicolaus initiated it saying it is evolving into a critical daily and weekly platform for professional workers of all times. Up about 4 . Now to the roadmap. Its another big day for obama care. The house is set to vote on its own fix to help people who lost coverage under the
Health Care Law<\/a>, while the president meets with ceos of
Health Insurance<\/a> companies to talk about the fix he proposed yesterday. What is the way forward for obama care . Well talk to a congressman on capitol hill and speak with a former cto of the u. S. Plus, a big ipo this morning. Shares of
Childrens Clothing<\/a> website zhu lily are set to open any minute. Well talk to the ceo later this hour. And
Sony Playstation<\/a> 4 is officially on sale everywhere. The lines have been long. With microsofts new console out next week, which one will bring in the best sales this
Holiday Season<\/a> . Well look at all of that. But we begin with obama care. Later today, president
Obama Meeting<\/a> with ceos of
Insurance Companies<\/a>. This, a day after announcing a plan to help peoples whose policies were cancelled under the new law stay on the policies. Our own john harwood saying insurance executives are saying the change is a joke, and he joins us from washington with more. John, before we get into the rhetoric here, i just have to point out, shares of the insurance company, they were rallying yesterday, and theyre
Still Holding<\/a> in there today. So the view from the street, at least, is that this is no disaster. Reporter no, i dont think its going to be a disaster, because i dont think the effect is going to be that great. You were talking, kelly, about the road forward. First of all, weve got a vote in the house today on a bill that would allow not only old customers but new customers to buy these noncompliant with the
Health Care Law<\/a> policies. That is not likely to become law. This is a case where gridlock is the president s friend. Many times its not his friend, but it is in this case, because its not likely that the
Republican House<\/a> and
Democratic Senate<\/a> are going to be able to agree on anything. Now, the question is, what happens with the fix that the president outlined yesterday . There are some states significant states, the state of washington, for example, just to take one, which spoke out yesterday that have said, no, we dont want to extend these old policies, we want to move into the new world of insurance. But there are also some states that have said, yes, were willing to do that. Florida is one of those states, and, therefore, the chairman of florida blue cross, who was on our air earlier today doesnt think this is a joke, and, in fact, is saying he wants to work with the white house to make it work for their customers. Heres pat garagity. There will be some confusion in the marketplace, but were willing to take on that effort, but we want to understand all of the parameters of the decision. And so, well be involved in this meeting at the white house to talk through all of the detail that comes behind a decision like this. Reporter now, there are a couple of different implications of what pat geraghty was talking about. One is the logistical challenge of getting to customers who received cancellation notices. The other is the pricing and the effect on the viability of the companies and the insurance exchanges. There is some flexibility in the law to give a cushion to some
Insurance Companies<\/a>, that would also, in turn, cushion the exchanges. Everything ultimately is still going to depend, kelly, on whether or not they can get the website working for those exchanges so that people can see their opthss options and people may not want to renew some of the old policies if they can find out whats available to them. Briefly, too, john, we were showing the tally of a vote on the floor right now. Which i understand is not the final vote. Can you explain here, is this the vote about moving forward the republican potential fix to the bill . Reporter no, that vote is going to come in the middle of the day. There are a variety of procedural things, and also a democratic alternative, which is essentially a codification of the same thing the president proposed yesterday, but we wont get the final vote on the house bill the socalled upton bill until the middle of the day. All right, john, thank you. Lets head to
Bertha Coombs<\/a> are more new information on the aca rollout, including who knew what and when. Bertha . Thats right, the
House Committee<\/a> putting out some emails from medicare and medicaid services, and essentially trying to get at who knew what, when, in terms of how badly the healthcare. Gov might perform. Back in midjuly, the deadlines were slipping, memos were saying that if they continue to slip and still doing functionality late into september, that that could affect quality. At the same time, you had one of the main contractors asking for more money, and henry sha, the deputy cio, sent an email to some of his colleagues saying, i dont want to give them any more money. I need to feel more confident theyre not going to crash the plane at takeoff, regardless of the price. That email was on july 16th. On july 17th, he and marilyn tavenner, the head of cms, were both testifying in front of congress saying things were on track, and they were going to be ready by october 1st. So as a result of that, a few days later, he sent an email widely to his staff saying, look, i under oath stated we are going to make october 1st. I would like you to put yourself in my shoes, standing before congress, which is in essence standing before the american public, and know you speak not of necessarily just half truths but a truth that you will make happen. In other words, he wanted to make sure this happened no matter what, even as they knew they were having some significant technical issues. Very interesting emails, kelly. Absolutely. And im sure the reaction is going to be strong, as well. Bertha, thank you. The house is voting today on the gopsponsored keep your health plan act. Joining us from capitol hill is congressman john langford, and, congressman, good morning. Thank you for joining us. Good morning to you. Can we begin with the rundown of whats happening today on capitol hill . Is it true the gop is voting for a gop im sorry, that congress is voting for a gop bill that would effectively dot same thing that president obama said he wanted to do yesterday, which is keep people on existing plans . Its similar to it. What the president is saying, if youre on this plan now, the limited group of people, and all of the other stipulations, were saying remove the stipulations. If the plan was available at all. That plan is available for anyone who wants to be able to get the plan, it allows them the options. This opens it up to a free market to say we wont include all of the business solutions. You had to previously be on that plan, you had to prove that, and also the plan has to promote the other exchange plans, all of the other restrictions, and just clear all of that and make it simple. To be clear, so the gop strategy now is not repeal obama care. Its make it work . No. No, its not. We dont think its going to make it work. Heres what were facing. There are 5
Million People<\/a> across the country that received a cancellation notice. The website is not on board. They cannot say it will be ready even by the 15th of december. If thats so, we have people coming january 1st that are currently insured now that will not be insured in january. That is absolutely unacceptable. Were trying to find everything we can to protect the people from the harmful effects of this law. I see. So the strategy is for individuals who had coverage, they want to keep that plan despite everything thats going on with obama care. Whats interesting, though, is to some extent, the gop plan would force
Insurance Companies<\/a> to have to abide by that, in order to keep people on existing coverage. Thats not exactly the free market at work. No, it actually just opens it up. It doesnt force them to. It opens it back up to it. So the key for us is the president wants to limit the number of plans available. We want to open it up and say as many plans want to be available could be available. Lets let the free market work. Okay. Im getting a little bit confused, so i cant imagine people trying to navigate this must feel right now. Absolutely. What is the state of affairs you would like to see come march 1st, 2014 . Best case scenario, march 1st, 2014, we have all options are back on the table. Individuals can choose either health plan if they choose those plans, and they have the opportunity. Right now, the president continues to just to close down the different options and opportunities on that. We want to see those back open again, and for any individual to do that. Its not just individuals. Let me clarify one thing. Individuals, they keep talking about the substandard plans for individuals. Lots of
Small Businesses<\/a> are on these associational plans. All of the associational plans are out, theyre made illegal by the
Affordable Care<\/a> act. So we want to open that back up for associations through the
Small Businesses<\/a>, chambers of commerce, all of the folks to provide the plans again. And finally, congressman, to be clear, because a lot of the state exchanges and weve been making this point all morning have been working better. Whats your view on that . The state exchanges have been working better than the federal exchange . Yes. I would say the state plans do work. That comes back to my original argument. If you go back to oklahoma, we have insure oklahoma, that weve done for years. It has been a good policy and a plan for us in oklahoma. Now, the
Affordable Care<\/a> act and steps in on top of it and says that has to be waived and gone. But youre okay with doing this at a state level . If you allow states to make those choices, states make those choices, theyll make sure it runs well. If its the federal government that does it, and the bill allows for that, if its the federal government, thats the problem. Im not saying the
Affordable Care<\/a> act and the mandates, let the states decide on that. It will be more efficient. All right. Congressman james lankford, appreciate your time. Thank you. As government workers race to repair healthcare. Gov, many have been left without insurance in the meantime. Whats the best question to resolve the troubled sites problems to get it up and running by the end of november, if thats possible . Anish choptra, good morning. Thanks for having me, good morning. It says the office has been sullied, and rightfully so. Where does it go from here . The administration has had an ambitious goal for having the site working by the end of november for the vast majority of americans, and my successor, todd park, spoke to that at a congre congressional hearing. And i feel confident theyll achieve that objective. You know, the chief
Technology Officer<\/a> position, what was it, as you understood it, at the time . Well, no, the position is clear. It reports directly to the president of the
United States<\/a> as a policy advisor to make sure that the ideas of the president cares about are infused with technology, data, innovation, to make a difference for the american people. Its a policy role. It doesnt manage contracts. It doesnt operate. Its a staff of just a couple of people. In the white house. To focus on advice to the president. Do you think if you had stayed in office, that you would have done things differently . Todd park is a phenomenal chief
Technology Officer<\/a>. I think of him as a brother in arms, and i would have done as much as todd has been doing. On many cases, when we see challenges of this sort, the chief of staff, or the president , would ask us to come in, as the president s done with todd park and jeff, to come in and address the issues once theyve realized there were challenges that needed to be overcome. And thats a playbook wed run for cash for clunkers and a few other initiatives. Sure. And having the luxury of not being involved in this right now, what would you say to him is the most important thing . What advice would you offer . Well, relentless focus on execution. Naming jeff to drive this gives the market, i hope, more confidence, that well see real milestones and progress against those milestones. Its also making sure that we force multiply. There are lots of people in this country that can help folks sign up for
Health Insurance<\/a>. We have tens of thousands of brokers to complement all of the public and nonprofit activities that are out there. And you saw earlier on your show, even some of the online forprofit
Insurance Broker<\/a> site, like ehealth and others, that can bring a value. That had always been part of the law, and im confident will be a big part of the solution. All right. Hopefully, theyre marshaling all resources. Thanks, we wanted to get your perspective, aneesh. Appreciate it. Thank you for having me. In wall street has its way, trading stocks in penny increments will be a thing of the past. So if you cant do that, what can you trade them in . More on nickels when we come back. No two people have the same financial goals. Pnc works with you to understand yours and help plan for your retirement. Visit a branch or call now for your personal retirement review. The most
Free Research<\/a> reports, customizable charts, powerful screening tools, and guaranteed 1second trades. And at the center of it all is a surprisingly low price just 7. 95. In fact, fidelity gives you lower trade commissions than schwab, td ameritrade, and etrade. Im monica santiago of fidelity investments, and low fees and commissions are another reason serious investors are choosing fidelity. Now get 200 free trades when you open an account. [man]ask me. [announcer]. Every wish for a bed that could feel perfect under every part of your body. [man]ask me about our tempurpedic. [announcer] theyre sleeping on the newest tempurpedic bed. The new tempur choice. [man]two remotes. [announcer] firmness settings for the head,legs,and back. These real owners get that famous tempurpedic comfort how they like it. [woman]ask me about the lumbar button. [man]lumbar button [woman]lumbar [announcer] tempurpedic. The most highly recommended bed in america. Now the fun begins welcome back. Im
Julia Boorstin<\/a> with breaking news on forbes media. The company, including the website and
Forbes Magazine<\/a> is exploring a sale and has hired
Deutsche Bank<\/a> to do so. The ceo telling his employees, hes received indications of interest and is organizing a process to test the waters regarding a sale, saying he expects interest from numerous suitors. The ceo says this will be the companys best
Financial Performance<\/a> in the last six year, saying its been bolstered by 25 digital revenue growth. Kelly . Wow, julia, thank you very much. Also, look at the
Financial Sector<\/a> as we follow the market higher towards the 1,800 mark. But financials one of the better performer, up. 4 . Dominic chu has more. Look at this, kelly, because among the bestperforming stocks so far are t. Rowe price, the mutual fund manager, up a little bit bush well call it a percent or more. Leukadia umbrella,
Holding Company<\/a> for mining, telecom, health care, and those in banking. Theyre the ones that own
Investment Bank<\/a> and
Securities Firm<\/a> jeffries, and on the other side, goldman sachs, wells fargo, citigroup, also among the bestperformers in the index overall, kelly. So, financials, yes, leading the way higher. Back over to you. All right, thank you. Now, wall street may be moving closer to allowing some shares to be bought and sold in nickels after more than a decade of trading in pennies. The plans to allow
Smaller Company<\/a> shares to begin trading in increments of 5 cents are winning the support of a variety of regulators, exchanges, bankers, and investors. And our next guest says the stock market has gotten too efficient for small caps to thrive. An interesting argument. Scott cooper is managing director,
Capital Formation<\/a> task force, and joining us from
Silicon Valley<\/a>, our own jon fortt on the set, as well. Guys, good morning. Good morning. Scott, first, to you, is this about efficiency, or is it about highfrequency said, and the market becoming inefficient because of the way the trades are being executed . Yeah, what this is about is were trying to enhance liquidity, especially the smaller end caps, and the problem is, if you look at trading activity, the institutions have pretty much all but abandoned the market. 70 plus of the shares held in this end of the market are by individual investors. The big thing we think we can do, if we enhance trading liquidity, it will bring back
Institutional Investors<\/a> and improve the prospects for the stocks. Bring this home for the folks at home. Exactly how does a shift to a nickel affect that . Why is that going to be better for the individual investor . Hows that going to increase the institutions trying to jump in . Yeah, so heres whats happening today, right . So today, you can trade in you can post, you know, shares in penny increments, but then, you can also price improve in as little as a tenth of a penny. If i put an order for 1,000 shares, someone can come in and take that away with a tenth of a penny price increase. What happens is people dont want to show volume in this market, because they get traded away quite significantly. What would happen, if you widen the increments and at the same time reduce the amount of points people can trade at, so they can trade at the bid or the offer or at at midpoint, youll actually make it much easier for people and incentivize people to show liquidity, and that will improve trading activity for the stocks. Scott, im curious. How much has liquidity suffered . Can you give us a sense of 2013 to, say, 1993 on this . Yeah, two things that have happened. The number of ipos has dramatically changed. If you look pre the last bubble, we had somewhere between 300 and 500 ipos a year. And about 80 of the ipos were 50 million or smaller. If you fast forward to today, 2013 is actually going to be quite a good year for ipos on a relative basis, between 175 and 200 ipos, but less than 10 will be 50 million market cap or smaller. And so, the biggest change that weve seen is companies are going public much later, in part we believe because the trading environment as a smallcap stock is just amenable to being a public company. Jon, this comes at an interesting time, a time when more and more of the startup firms in
Silicon Valley<\/a> are pursuing, what, buyouts by much larger companies, and we havent seen them go public until the late stages. Isnt that a good thing, though . It is a good thing for them. You have to think a lot of the rich angels and super private investors are getting the benefit in some of the companies, whereas if they had come public sooner, mom and dad might have been able to buy into that if theyre doing their homework, watching cnbc, figuring out about the companies before they get huge. Its kind of obvious, oh, facebook, i know thats something already big, not just going to be big. Thats an interesting argument. Is access to the companies at an early stage a key reason why you want to switch to fivecent increments, or is that seen as a possible side benefit in. Yeah, no, a couple of things. And jon hit right on it. Two issues. Number one is just in general, ipos are jobcreation events for the company. If you look at companies that go public, they tend to increase the postipo employment by 150 . And over the last ten years, we had ipo volumes the way we used to be, wed have 1. 9 million new jobs probably created. And the second issue is exactly what jon said, which is whats happening here is almost all of the appreciation of the companies is going into the pockets of a credited investors and people lucky enough to invest in 96 of the population invests in the
Public Markets<\/a> via the 401 k plans, and we think a lot of the appreciation ought to be able to go to a broader set of people. Yeah, well, it makes a lot of sense to me. Granted, theres risks, but theres always risks. Its nice if the folks at home can play and feel like they have a shot at making it big. Nickel stocks. Well see. Scott, thank you very much. Managing partner at dreesen horowitz, and by the way, speaking of ipos, zulily trading open and significantly higher, almost 80 higher on its debut. Its just under the 40 mark. Jon, this isnt unusual. In fact, this looks almost like the opening moves on twitter not too long ago. Not like chag, though. This will get them some attention. Its one that hadnt gotten a lot of tradition from the tech press, maybe because they cater to kids and moms, and based in seattle. But its interesting, because they get quite a bit of traffic on mobile. Mobile continues to be a key component in any tech
Company Coming<\/a> public. And we speak to the companys ceo in a couple minutes time. And now moving even higher from where it opened moments ago. This is the
Ecommerce Company<\/a> zulily trading over 40 a share right now. John, thank you very much. For your insight on that, as well. Coming up, mark your calendar, because the
Holiday Season<\/a> is fast approaching black friday, if you can believe it. Its only two weeks from today. So which retailers do you want to buy and sell here . The answer when squawk on the street comes back. [ male announcer ] more room in economy plus. More comfort, more of what you need. Thats. Built around you friendly. Welcome back, and youre looking at shares of ecommerce site zulily up 82 in their debut over at the nasdaq, hugging the 40 mark, up 18 from the open. And we will have more with the companys ceo coming up in just a bit. But it does give you an interesting read on the consumer and on where demand patterns are shifting, as we approach the key
Holiday Season<\/a>. We are, in fact, just two weeks from black friday. And joining us now with more perspective on this is richard jaffee, retail analyst at stifle, at key banc capitalist analysts. Ed, are they going to crowd out the
Traditional Chain Stores<\/a> . Look, obviously, ecommerce is a huge focus of the chain stores. A number of them are investing to compete. Mobile is a key theme. So i think theyre all clearly watching players like zulily very, very closely. And what do you recommend for investors . Who, then can anyone win here, or is this just a case of finding winners and losers within the traditional retail space . One of the companies thats been very aggressive in investing the online space, particularly within mobile, is nordstrom. We think they have a bestinclass delivery systems, capabilities to ship from the store, and its the compelling mobile content they offer that would help them compete against the likes of the zulily. Its interesting you bring them up, because after the earnings reports, a lot of investors are rethinking this one. Whats the argument for nordstrom strategically, given that theyre not necessarily connecting with the consumer here . Well, i would say theyre investing for the longer term, and obviously, that weighs on any given quarters results. One other interesting thing with nordstrom is their rack business is doing a little bit business than the fullprice business. That speaks more to the consumer. Consumers are looking for the deals, and thats what that rack business serves for them. Richard, do you still like nordstrom . I like nordstrom, but following the ecommerce comment, i really like macys. Theyre the 10thlargest
Internet Retailer<\/a> in america today, and yet they have 800 bricks and mortar stores. They satisfy the customer in two ways and have an advantage in that regard. Was that overlooked in the latest beat . Now, the ecommerce sales are factored in to the samestore sales, or is separate . They separate it out, and you can do the math both ways. 4. 6 comp with, 3. 5 without. Theyre doing well either way. They have the great product and exciting consumers to come to the stores, to the website and to the mobile site. And theres been plenty of discussion about this already, but i would imagine thats why youd want to steer clear of, for example, a target with a much smaller ecommerce operation. Who else, though . If thats the thesis you want to stick with, kind of the consumerplay plus the ecommerce, who else sticks out . I think product is key, and
Urban Outfitters<\/a> does a great job with the mobile platform. 30 of the revenues coming from that channel. I think gap has done a great job with the omni channel for gap, banana republic, old navy, athletea, and great merchandisen online, and tjx, launching a commerce site, its about the offprice buyer looking for great value, but now the ecommerce channel working for them, as well. Good point. Thank you for your perspective, and happy early black friday or something. And to you. Have a great weekend. Shop early. Going back to zulily, debuting on the nasdaq and a strong performance, up 75 as we speak. This after pricing at 22 a share. And that was above the upwardly revised range of 18 to 20. And now, here first on cnbc is darrell cavens, ceo of zulily, with our own jon fortt at post 9, as well. Darrell, good morning. Good morning. Thanks for having me. Thank you for being here. So do you regret not doubling the price . Well, i think we wanted to make sure we had a price that, you know, fit for the business and where its at. And im pretty excited to see where its trading today. But, you know, we just remain very, very focused on building the business. You know, were working to build something for the long term here. Darrell, very interesting company. Youve got a lot of people who arent moms shopping for kids might not know about it. Youve been around for just under four years. Sure. I might say its similar to fad in some ways where youre trying to source unique products, get them out there, and entice moms to shop. But are there dangers in this model
Going Forward<\/a> . Were seeing fab cutting back, moving to a traditional retail model. Are you going to get caught up in that, too . We think our models pretty special. And i think when we started this business, what we saw was consumers absolutely loving the unique and fresh model of the flash sales. And i think if you look at our category and our business, were pretty different out there. Weve got an incredible assortment of brands coming to the site every day. Were launching over 4,500 new products a day. An thats why the moms are loving what we have to offer. Were providing an incredible value, typically 50 off retail pricing and the numbers we have out there speak for themselves, that our business is pretty different than others out there in the marketplace. How sustainable is that . Is
Technology Going<\/a> to allow you to do efficiency and keep that going . Or at a certain point, are you going to need to raise prices or get margin from somewhere . Well, i think you see as we even look to come to the market today, we wouldnt be doing this if we didnt think there was a great longterm opportunity for us here. Weve been able to scale this business up considerably. Really based on that great value for consumers. We use a tremendous amount of technology. You mentioned that. You know, from how were launching brands, weve got over 300 people in our
Merchandising Division<\/a> that are out there sourcing brands every day. Weve got a phenomenally efficient studio business, where were able to bring those products through very cost effectively, using a lot of technology, and run them through a proprietary set of technologies in our fulfillment centers, and i think that has enabled us to drive kind of variable unit costs out of the business, and as i look forward, a lot more opportunity keeps improving that with scale. Interesting. Darrell, by the way, why the nasdaq for this listing . We thought the nasdaq would be a great partner for us. You know, they have a
Great Technology<\/a> base. Weve got a
Strong Technology<\/a> platform. And it felt like a great match. Tell me a bit about mobile and how quickly thats growing versus the rest of your business. Sure. So mobiles been phenomenal for us. When we started the business, we had mobile in mind as excuse me from building from the getgo. Over 45 of sales today are happening on mobile, up from just 30 a year ago. So were seeing consumers engage with us on mobile. And again, with the unique, fresh content every day, when moms got a few minutes standing in the starbucks line, or waiting for the kids in the pickup line at school, shes able to pull out her app on zulily on mobile and browse kind of discover great new brands and products. So mobiles been a big enabler for us, and as i look forward, i think a lot more opportunity could continue to drive a very strong mobile experience and mobile demand. Darrell, you and mark vaden, i hope im pronouncing that right. Yes, thats right. First at blue nile, then zulily. Whats next . Were super excited to be here with zulily. Its still very early days for us. We think theres tremendous opportunity to continue to grow this business. And all of our time and focus is going here. And, you know, its just a phenomenal platform for growth, and this is where were focused. What about dads, darrell . I shop on mobile more than my wife does. Well, we yeah, go ahead. We have an awful lot of dads that come to the site. What we see is the mom market, you know, if your house is anything like mine, my wife has a disproportionate amount of the decisionmaking there, and i think were seeing a very good way of putting it. Yeah. [ laughter ] darrell, we really appreciate your time this morning. And congratulations. The shares are up 80 . Darrell cavens, the ceo of zulily. Thank you very much for having us. Have a great weekend. Sonys playstation 4 is available everywhere starting today. It does come a week ahead of mike ro
Microsofts Xbox<\/a>. Does that mean theyre aheade o the game this season . And best way for them to grow so that they really become cauldrons of prosperity and cities of opportunity . What we have found is that if that family is moved into safe, clean
Affordable Housing<\/a>, places that have access to great school systems, access to jobs and multiple transportation modes then the neighborhood begins to thrive and then really really take off. The oxygen of
Community Redevelopment<\/a> is financing. And all this rebuilding that happened could not have happened without organizations like citi. Citi has formed a partnership with our company so that we can take all the lessons from the revitalization of urban america to other cities. So we are now working in chicago and in washington, dc and newark. Its amazing how important safe,
Affordable Housing<\/a> is to the future of our society. Geothe last thing i want iswho doesnto feel like someone is giving me a sales pitch, especially when it comes to my investments. You want a broker you can trust. A lot of guys at the other firms seemed more focused on selling than their clients. Thats why i stopped working at my old brokerage and became a
Financial Consultant<\/a> with charles schwab. Avo what kind of
Financial Consultant<\/a> are you looking for . Talk to us today. Bob pisani, we are edging closer to some key levels on the market here, sir. How important is it how important is it if we hit those before the end of the year . Nice, round numbers, people like it at 1,800 in the dow, for example. 16,000, 1,800 in the s p, 16,000 in the dow. Theres been resistance in the past when you get to round numbers on the s p. For the moment, record highs. Record highs, all four of the sectors are record highs, six weakness a row the s p has been up. We havent had a win like that since, i think, 2009, seven weeks in a row on the s p. So two things that have happened this week. Basically, the taper trades, the taper coming in december, the trades are all off. Two other trades have replaced them. Hig highbeta,
Interest Rate<\/a> sensitive, linkedin, zillow, yahoo high beta. Thats what high beta means. And emerging markets have bounced back, brazil, thailand, all are up 3 , 4 , 5 . Same situation with the other
Interest Rate<\/a> sensitive group, housing stocks. So horton, pulte, k. B. Home, ryland, tripoint had good earnings reports, and that helped the group in the middle of the week. And the other big group, biotech stock, very iffy, but again, gilead, biogenetic, all on the upside. The big question is, can we continue on this, and the important point the traders are making is 15 times forward earnings is where we are on the s p. Thats not overvalued. Theyre expecting 10
Earnings Growth<\/a> next year. That will come down. The bottom line, were getting 4
Earnings Growth<\/a> this year. Thats good enough to get to the record highs and still not be overvalued. Thats the main thing the markets got going for it. The other big thing is, everybodys very skeptical about the rally. So lo so a lot of money remains. Some of the read points, the modern day record, newyear highs, new closing highs for, you know, almost three dozen times so far this year. Yeah. The history, the performance, the nasdaq up 32 , it just seems like the statistics continue to confound. This is a very, very powerful rally. And one of the big problems is hedge funds have had a very tough time about it this year, particularly long short equity funds, because theyre long a book and short a book, and theyre underperforming the bogeys because the shorts havent been working. The longonly guys are doing better than the long short guys, they just cant get shorts to stick for very long. Passive investing wins the day again. Thank you very much, sir. Investors are acquainted with janet yellen. Whats their take of the incoming fed chairwoman . Well ask when we come back. [ bagpipes and drums playing over ] [ music transitions to rock ] make it happen with the allnew fidelity active trader pro. Its one more innovative reason serious investors are choosing fidelity. Get 200 free trades when you open an account. Theres nothing like being your own boss and my customers are really liking your flat rate shipping. Fedex one rate. Really makes my life easier. Maybe a promotion is in order. Good news. I got a new title. And a raise . Management couldnt make that happen. [ male announcer ] introducing fedex one rate. Simple, flat rate shipping with the reliability of fedex. [ male announcer ] introducing fedex one rate. Maestro of project management. Baron of the buildout. You need a permit. To be this awesome. And you. Rent from national. Because only national lets you choose any car in the aisle. And go. You can even take a fullsize or above, and still pay the midsize price. aaron purrrfect. vo meeeow, business pro. Meeeow. Go national. Go like a pro. All right. Some big calls are just ahead on the halftime report. We have the s p analyst who slap add buy or sell on twitter today. Well explain exactly whats behind that bearish call. Plus, jpmorgans tom lee boosted his target on the s p, and hes here to break down what he thinks will lift the recordbreaking markets even higher. Were also whale watching, the big investors making surprising moves, and well ask if its safe to swim with the whales this time around. Well see you at the top of the hour, kel. All right. Stay dry. Market bulls have been singing this morning to the tune of
Janet Yellens<\/a> confirmation hearing. The new high run continues with the s p 500 now eyeing the 1,800 mark. Lets get some perspective from art cashin, ubs director of floor operations, and tom po porecelli. Tom, first, the take away from yellen is dotdotdot i think people are trying to determine how dovish she was, if she was more balanced, et cetera, and that misses the point. From our perspective, it seems like she wants to toe the bernanke line, which is probably not a big deviation in terms of the framework bernanke has put in place, and perhaps thats the most critical part of this. Shell have plenty of opportunity to show us her leanings, whether its to a significant degree dovish or moderate degree dovish. But yesterday was extremely balanced, and she didnt want to rock the boat. I wonder where that leaves the tripwires, usually when were talking about the 10year . Is it the 10year tripwires . What to you is its a couple of things. If youre into conspiracy theories, there is a rumor around all week that somebody took a big position in the spider 180s. The etf for the s p 500. Right. And the mark conveniently is obliging by marching slowly in that direction. To add further to what tom said, i think that as much as the market was impressed with what yellen said, the demeanor of the hearings impressed everybody. They did everything but buy her a corsage. [ laughter ] so that probably hints a seamless transition, and a continuation of the bernanke policy. I wonder, as well, we talk about how the markets you know, part of it is the s p 500, but frankly, across the board, equities are at new highs, some of the signs out of credit markets, you know this as much as anyone, looking at
Financial Markets<\/a> more broadly, are conditions getting frothy . No, its funny, i would say in the consumer space in particular, id still say theres down right depressed for lack of a better word. Having said that but thats actually what i mean. Yes. In other words, we have stocks at new highs, while theres consumer confidence, frankly, at not great levels and signs that confidence has even weakened lately, and, you know, divorced in front of them. Yeah, this is how i would define the setup for 2014, if you will. I would argue that this coming year, well look better in terms of
Economic Activity<\/a> than this year has already. I mean, look, youre looking at 1. 8 growth year for 2013. Next year, probably 2. 4 growth year. That will be the best growth year we forecasted since the recovery started. Where do you get sort of this extra boost from . The extra boost comes from the fact that the credit markets, particularly as it relates to the consumer, are really starting to heal. And i would actually argue that sort of the backdrop is ripe for credit to really start to expand in the consumer space. Were not quite there yet, and i think the regulatory hurdles are significant, but were moving in the right direction. Briefly, art, what do you take from the zulily ipo doing as well as it just did, up 80 . I think the animal spirits are up in that general area. You know, the social media thing, we have twitter here, we had a variety of other things. And i just worry a little bit that we might be edging back toward that eyeball and click thing that we had just before the year 2000. So its not quite frothy yet, but it wouldnt take much stirring to get it there. All right. Art cashin, tom porcelli, thank you so much. Thank you. Fan boys rejoice. Playstation 4 is available everywhere starting today. Now, the playstation out a week ahead of microsofts competing new xbox. It also costs about 100 less. Does that make sony ahead of the game this
Holiday Season<\/a> . The answer when we come back. Stacys mom has got it goin on stacys mom has got it goin on stacys mom has got it goin on [ male announcer ] the beautifully practical and practically beautiful cadillac srx. Get the best offers of the season now. Lease this 2014 srx for around 369 a month with premium
Care Maintenance<\/a> included. [ male announcer ] how could switchgrass in argentina, change engineering in dubai, aluminum production in south africa, and the
Aerospace Industry<\/a> in the u. S. . At t. Rowe price, we understand the connections of a complex, global economy. Its just one reason over 70 of our mutual funds beat their 10year lipper average. T. Rowe price. Invest with confidence. Request a prospectus or summary prospectus with investment information, risks, fees and expenses to read and consider carefully before investing. The next generation has arrived. People were lining up for sonys playstation 4, which is now officially available in
Stores Across<\/a> the country. Take a look there at some of the images. In fact, i saw some of this on the street last night. With
Microsofts Xbox<\/a> one out next week, the question is, which one has the leg up this
Holiday Season<\/a> . Josh lipton is live in
San Francisco<\/a> with more. Is it crowded there, josh . Yeah, well, i tell you, kelly, were outside, so the gamestop here in
San Francisco<\/a>. I can tell you gamers were here last night. They were back at 6 00 a. M. This morning. Sony, of course, pulling out all the stops to promote the new ps4 console, hosting launch parties from coasttocoast. Last night, hundreds lined up in new york for a launch party hosted by sony. This was really the first shot in the upcoming video game wars. Microsoft, remember, its expected to release its xbox one console later this month, which will be sonys biggest competition in the battle for hardcore gamers. So how do the two consoles actually stack up . The specs are expected to be pretty similar. Heres the big difference. The ps4 will retail for about 100 less, and sony is hoping that will give it the
Competitive Edge<\/a> it needs to beat out its rival. In terms of the overall numbers, were planning on selling 5
Million Units<\/a> worldwide by the end of our
Financial Year<\/a> end of march. And thats significantly ahead of where we were with the last generational playstation 3. Morgan stanley forecasting similar numbers, with the expectations for sony to sell around 3
Million Units<\/a> by the end of the year. And any way you slice it, sony has held a dominant lead in terms of hardware units shipped to retailers this year, with playstation consoles accounting for some 50 of the market in 2013. Microsoft comes in a distant second at 30 . If you take a longerterm look at the battle between sony and microsoft, it shows the consoles are pretty evenly matched. With the ps3 and xbox 360, theyve shipped about 80
Million Units<\/a> over the product cycle. In first place, though, actually, is the nintendo wii. It shipped about 100
Million Units<\/a>. Analysts peg the console industry at about 10 billion, so listen, this is a battle neither side is willing to lose. Well be here all day talking to gamers, talking to ps4 fans. So look for a lot more reporting throughout the day. Guys, back to you. Sure. And gamestop, itself, one of the winners here. Josh, thank you very much. Jon fortt here with some reaction to all of this. It really is neckandneck. It really is. I was just talking to rick doherty at envision engineering group, a longtime technology analyst, studied the market a long time, and he thinks sony is well positioned this time around in terms of the way theyve been supporting developers and getting the games out. Some eightplayer games that are being tested right now on the console. Just in terms of game play. But what i wonder is, is this the end of the console era . Youve got games on smartphones now, games on tablets. Is this technology leaping enough to pull the folks on the edge back into console gaming . I dont know. Real quick, is it a mistake for microsofts device to be 100 more . Its gotta be 100 better if 100 more. Well put. Are you a gamer . No, not anymore. Not a gamer. I didnt think so. Evan spiegel reportedly turned down a multibillion dollar offer not once, but twice. Google reportedly bid 4 billion for snapchat, outbidding google by about a billion dollars. He believes at the rate his company is growing, it will be valued much higher. Heres what he said about his primary focus with the company on squawk on the street last month. Were great to have a messaging model in china, and theyve been able to do that without relying on brand advertising, so thats exciting. In the near term, well look at maybe transactions and make advertising down the road. If you could snapchat your advice to evan spiegel, what would it say or look like . Tweet us squawkstreet. So you can get out of your element. So you can explore a new frontier and a different discipline. Get two times the points on travel and dining at restaurants from chase sapphire preferred. So you can be inspired by great food once again. Chase sapphire preferred. So you can. Store and essentially they just get sold something. We provide the exact individualization that your body needs. Before you invest in a mattress, discover the bed clinically proven to improve sleep quality. The sleep number bed. Once you experience it, theres no going back. Final days for our lowest price ever on c4
Queen Mattress<\/a> setsjust 1299. Plus special financing until 2015. Only at one of our 425 sleep
Number Stores<\/a> nationwide. Sleep number. Comfort individualized welcome back. Its tweet time. Snapchats evan spiegel turning down the multibilliondollar buyout offer not once, but twice. Heres some of the advice. Mike tweeted kate tweeting and greg tweeting this offer will selfdestruct in three, two, one, as will snapchats user base, should have accepted. I think its hard for people to think about turning down a couple billion dollars, but if jim cramer is right, maybe it will be 10 billion. Now, time for the half and scott. Sell. Thats what one analyst said to do with twitter. Well hear from him live. Its our call of the day. Whale watching. What big names are the biggest investors buying and selling, and should you jump in the water with them . We do begin with stocks, which are on track now for a sixth straight week of gains. Little now standing in the way of dow 16,000, certainly not the fed nominee who did nothing to upset the bulls yesterday. And one of wall streets top dogs is upping his target for the end of the year. Youll hear from him in a moment. But first, the question to the traders is a global rally over the","publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"archive.org","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","width":"800","height":"600","url":"\/\/ia800903.us.archive.org\/29\/items\/CNBC_20131115_140000_Squawk_on_the_Street\/CNBC_20131115_140000_Squawk_on_the_Street.thumbs\/CNBC_20131115_140000_Squawk_on_the_Street_000001.jpg"}},"autauthor":{"@type":"Organization"},"author":{"sameAs":"archive.org","name":"archive.org"}}],"coverageEndTime":"20240620T12:35:10+00:00"}