congressional subpoenas. so, it wouldn't have taken us two years to get former-white house counsel don mcgahn's incriminating testimony. um, it would protect inspector generals so they couldn't be fired as donald trump fired i think five inspector generals because they were revealing things of malfeasance or corruption within the executive. it would have better protected whistle-blowers that -- that faced death threats as a result of the president's actions. it would -- it would've helped congress prevent the former president or future president from enriching themselves by violating the emoluments clause and having gulf nations rent hotel rooms they didn't bother to occupy as a way of enriching the president and ingratiating themselves. it would have put teeth in the hatch act. so, kellyanne conway couldn't violate the hatch act and merely say, well, blah, blah, blah, you know, who is going to do anything about it? so, in those ways and many others, if we had a problem again with, for example, an