which invites two interpretations, one is pretty grim, namely the rnc views this and everything else that day as non-violent and legal political disc discourse. a more charitable interpretation is that in ha hand-fisted way the drafters were trying to draw you a distinction between the problem here and those who did not invade the capitol. if that's the case this draft language truly was able to make that points, however, indirectly, why was it replaced by the legitimate discourse characterization? now we are talking, why wasn't there language saying what mitch mcconnell said? i'm not going to keep you waiting. here's why, of course. >> the january 6th rally was a