like that theory. they say you didn't take into consideration the wind currents in your explanation and your explanation does not make any e sense. i know you dismissed the bases of criticism. what do you make of this specific criticism that your analysis does not account for the object moving. >> it is simply. you can do the math yourself or find a high schooler to do a math, they'll tell you what's going on. the computation is simple. you don't need to account for the wind and the speed. this is something they mention inside "the new york times" story, they eliminated wind and balloons as a particular cause. it did not say happen fast and wind is not a factor, that's still very much on the table. >> you believe this is about people on earth and what they