animation re-creations were not allowed to be used. randi kaye, cnn, new york. >> this will be a very important ruling for the defense and prosecution. let's go back to our panel. any of the four of you, any of you believe this judge is going to admit this into evidence? okay. >> the resounding silence. >> marcia clark, why not, just too prejudicial, too hollywood basically? >> no, not too hollywood, anderson. you have to have a certain level of accuracy and re-creation of the actual conditions. so as was pointed out in some of the questioning, it wasn't raining or nighttime. you didn't have other pieces of evidence that were present. to make it more probative, you have to show that kind of accuracy. i'm surprised maybe he's never been refused admission of this kind of re-enactment before, but