do you think that's the right thing to do? >> they're going to be homing in on his conversations, everything he has done since he has been to work on the railroad. they're going to be looking at that day before, what he did. the event recorder will tell them a lot about how he treated the train as far as the speed restrictions and operating requirements. everything points to me that they need to look at his conversations and his training. they will go back and talk to his instructors, see who qualified him to operate on the territory, and see if there is anything. because he is not able to communicate what he did prior to that they're going to have to rely on the physical evidence, the event recorder and that type of information. so right now they have to treat him as if he didn't survive the crash. >> which obviously saying he doesn't remember anything. >> right. >> he had been an engineer for four years on amtrak. >> right. >> i know he was relatively new