problem was he was soft on corruption and he was replaced by somebody else soft on corruption. and except the person he was replaced with soft on corruption was someone not -- that the individual who was prosecuting his son's company. >> okay. again, but i'm saying that investigation was already dormant under the guy you are saying he wanted to get rid of because of something he wasn't doing. that don't add up. >> a lot of people who are sticking foup up for the vice presidentic is itting up for his son providing cover for it saying there is a dead story nothing to talk about but we said file articles of impeachment for a whistleblower complaint we haven't read based on someone who has no firsthand knowledge. i want to wait until tomorrow. many of my colleagues to be able to read the crypt transcript of what was said on the call but we can't wait until tomorrow. we're getting way ahead of our skis in the house and instead of talking about work being together on the cam the heroin opioid abuse ep dem, immigration, national security