with a libel notice and a full-blown lawsuit could follow. what could be so bad that the reporter would decide, i've had it? you know something, i wondered the same thing. it had to be pretty bad for a reporter to do this. apparently he feels that the mayor insinuated he was a pedophile for having been out near his house. he suggested he was not on public property, but on cinder blocks in his yard -- >> taking photos of children. >> right. pretty ugly stuff. it's weird. if first of all it's backwards. the reporter suing the guy he reports on. >> you're not surprised in this instance. >> i think what he really wants is the mayor to come out and recant what he said. he said he is not looking for monetary damages at this point. in canada, it's different. they put out a notice and then they have time in which to file