according to his attorney, he had to keep his arm around eric garner's neck because he was pressed up against a plate glass store window. he was afraid he was going to go through the window. he had to keep it around his neck to bring eric garner to the ground. he makes a very compelling case, the officer when you even read it, it's very compelling and the grand jury believed him in person over what they saw with their eyes on the videotape. >> well apparently he did make a compelling case, alisyn. because the grand jury, no true billed it. they returned no indictment. butt larger question becomes, if you have a prosecutor who is controlling the order of witnesses, the flow of information, who testifies, who doesn't testify, the manner in which the case is presented -- should that be reexamined? it's all about i understand the grand jury is the process we have now. but that's what needs to be examined. should that in fact be? understand that the whole reason for the grand jury is to engender confidence, so you