previous debates over presidents. in the past, often a president's defenders have gone with a third of those and say whatever the president has done it doesn't merit his removal. it may have been unwise or unethical and may have admit the threshold of high crime and misdemeanor. in this case we are seeing the president's defenders walk out and say essentially nothing to see here. totally fine to have a chief executive pressure a foreign power to cough up evidence on his political rivals dominantically and i think we are seeing push-back within the republican party from people who particularly have experience with law enforcement and national security who are particularly alarmed by that. >> those members are back in district the next couple of weeks except the members of house intelligence who may be called back and we will see what their response is. yoni, nice to have you you.