held up as examples. >> yeah. it raises discrepancies. bonds, clemens and ortiz all faced accusations of doping. they all denied it. yet we see in this case ortiz was inducted into the hall of fame. and the other two will not because they are no longer eligible. one of the big differentiators is ortiz was great with the sports media. john, you don't have to recuse yourself for loving big papi. everybody loved big papi. he had a great relationship with the sports writers. they are voting on the hall of fame inductees. a lot of people are asking, if barry bonds were a nicer guy, would he be inducted by now? should that be a i criteria for induction? is this about acknowledging and honoring the best players of a specific era? and if it is, they really missed the mark with these two.