owners to carry a weapon legally concealed outside of their home. given the right turn of the court -- by the way, none of this is an accident. these nominees are litmus tested on these issues when they're nominated. do we expect this court to further expand the second amendment? >> on that i think there's no question, jim. otherwise they would not have agreed to hear this case. and you're quite right, the court after 2008 when it said at least theoretically there's a second amendment individual right to own guns in the home to protect yourself, never put meat on the bones of exactly the contours of that, right. i think this is where they put meat on the bones, and i think you're very right to see that the court looks as though now there are enough justices to vastly expand what the individual right to bear arms will mean. >> just quickly, we know that confidence in this court has declined. public approval. we've seen some justices very publicly push back against that