point? >> well, i don't know how they could trust the malaysian authorities. they've given so much misinformation and they've colored everything they've said with characterizations and conclusions, as opposed to the raw facts. and the fact is, we know the transponder stopped working. we don't know that it was turned off yet. now it's accepted as a fact that it was. we keep hearing about intentional misconduct, when there's really no facts to support it. we have abandoned every single theory that would put any responsibility on the part of the airline or on boeing, and boeing and the airline are the ones investigating themselves. so it's really difficult. this has exact -- is exactly what occurred in the indonesia aircraft, where we kept hearing the same things early on, even days before anything was uncovered, before there was any radar data. you heard the same kind of talk. >> all right. mr. marks, you managed to make the point eloquently that you've just about sort of taken everybody off the table. so what are you suggesting?