majority with the republican house of representatives to prevent it from happening. that's his goal. he's made it very clear that no matter what emerges from this negotiation is unacceptable. is that reasonable? i don't believe so. the ink is not even dry before we even know what this agreement looks like. has he offered any alternative to what is emerging? he has had months to offer that alternative and has not. >> what could he do? if this is what the u.s. is saying he needs to offer an alternative, what should he be fighting for? >> i think it's legitimate for the israeli prime minister to make his opinion known publicly. i think the way he's chosen to go about it is probably the wrong way to do it obviously, given the circus that's been going on for the past few weeks. i think it's important given the circus to take a step back and look at the real issue here. the speech netanyahu's visit, very much a distraction from where the attention should be which is iran's violations of u.n. security council resolutions, the exact contours