to testify publicly? >> that remains to be seen. but with his new addendum to his testimony it is pretty compelling because with his new addendum he explicitly said there was a quid pro quo between the trump administration and the ukrainians. call it extortion or bribery, it is all the same thing when the president used his powers to freeze military aid, to dangle a critical meeting between the white house and the ukrainian leader in exchange for launching two bogus investigations. >> sondland did admit in the addendum the meeting would only come in exchange for investigations, although he doesn't use the term extortion or bribery or quid pro quo. john bolton's lawyer said today that his clients, that mr. bolton, the former national security adviser has significant insights into matters involved in the impeachment inquiry but he will not testify until a court resolves whether or not he has to comply with the subpoena. should you, democrats leading the inquiry wait until you could