Live Breaking News & Updates on Bogus investigations
Stay updated with breaking news from Bogus investigations. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
you get that? you're wrong for expecting anything to be there but he won't stop talking about the findings of his report which are not much really. it's maddening. but it's also smart from the gop point of view. these gop bogus investigations, they're a pattern that keep going and going and going. because the republicans, they work. just this week, on tuesday, a federal jury found hillary clinton campaign, not guilty of lying to the fbi. he was acquitted. it az all flowed from the trump administration era probe into the investigation into trump's ties to russia. he was supposed to find the smoking gun for the gop and the fact that he didn't doesn't matter to gop, they got to attack clinton again and again. mean whirl the lack of anything happening there with increased pressure on the justice department to ditch, excuse me, wrap up that ridiculous politicized gop-led probe and yet the only thing that still moves glacially amid global warming is merrick garland.
senate if the party wins back control of senate committees in november. -- would want to investigate -- quote, like a mosquito in a nudist colony. it's a target rich environment. which is not, given the days in his committee releasing his report to the run-up of 2020 elections -- this is how senator johnson set expectations -- quote, he wouldn't shut up about the reports allege findings. quote, mr. johnson conceded in an interview that there would be no massive smoking gun, saying there was a misconception on the part of the public that there would be. did you get that? he's not gonna stop talking about the report, which is not much, really. it's maddening. but this also smart from the gop point of view. these gop bogus investigations, they keep going and going and going. as for the republicans, they
when he said, quote, i would like you to do us a favor, though, because our country has been through a lot and ukraine knows a lot about it. i would like you to find out what happened with this whole situation with ukraine. they say crowdstrike. i guess you have one of your wealthy people. the server, they say ukraine has it. and then this. there's a lot of talk about biden's son, that biden stopped the prosecution. a lot of people want to find out about that, so whatever you can do with the attorney general would be great. now we have rudy giuliani with what appears to be the very first time someone explicitly linked the ambassador's removal to those bogus investigations. that seems like a pretty big deal, doesn't it, right? the president's attorney admitting he wanted the ambassador out of the way so he could get the investigations the president wanted, admitting it right after his return from yet another sketchy mission to ukraine. seems like something the president would want to hear all about, doesn't it? >> how much has giuliani shared
do with the attorney general would be great. now we have rudy giuliani with what appears to be the very first time someone explicitly linked the ambassador's removal to those bogus investigations. that seems like a pretty big deal, doesn't it, right? the president's attorney admitting he wanted the ambassador out of the way so he could get the investigations the president wanted, admitting it right after his return from yet another sketchy mission to ukraine. seems like something the president would want to hear all about, doesn't it? >> how much has giuliani shared with you about his recent trip to ukraine? >> oh, not too much. >> not too much? >> not too much? i thought he had a whole lot. let's remember "the wall street journal" reported friday that while giuliani was on his way back from ukraine, while his plane was still taxiing down the runway, the president called to ask him, what did you get? hey, what did you get?
he's absolutely right. we have nothing new from the democrats last week. it was the same old debunked conspiracy theories. >> president trump asked for a favor. he wanted ukraine to announce to bogus investigations. one into former vice president biden, his leading opponent in the election and another to advance a conspiracy theory that ukraine, not russia attacked our elections in 2016. >> no, they just keep making it up. no one is saying ukraine and not russia interfered. the question is did you frame them as well as russia. just the contact between the ukrainian government come another nevermind other evidence but they suggest it's worth investigating. don't you love how they're obsessed about getting to the bottom of election meddling, except when it's done on their behalf? the ig report literally just confirm that hillary clinton didn't just invite foreign meddling in the 2016 election, she paid for it. then her team pushed to the fbi and standby for the
democrats last week. it was the same old debunked conspiracy theories. >> president trump asked for a favor. he wanted ukraine to announce to bogus investigations. one into former vice president biden, his leading opponent in the election and another to advance a conspiracy theory that ukraine, not russia attacked our elections in 2016. >> no, they just keep making it up. no one is saying ukraine and not russia interfered. the question is did you frame them as well as russia. just the contact between the ukrainian government come another nevermind other evidence but they suggest it's worth investigating. don't you love how they're obsessed about getting to the bottom of election meddling, except when it's done on their behalf? the ig report literally just confirm that hillary clinton didn't just invite foreign meddling in the 2016 election, she paid for it. then her team pushed to the fbi and standby for the democrats to totally blow off
appropriated by congress because of our national security interests in ukraine. and he needed help in the form of an oval office meeting so he could show the world the united states stands with him against russian aggression. president trump should have focused on america's national security and on the interests of the american people on that call. instead he completely ignored them in order to push his own personal, political interests. president trump asked for a favor. he wanted ukraine to announce two bogus investigations. one into former vice president biden, his leading opponent in a 2020 election and another to advance a conspiracy theory that ukraine, not russia attacked our elections in 2016. these were not legitimate requests. neither was supported by the evidence. one investigation was designed
ukraine expert. vindman was on that july 25th phone call and testified that it was clear that president trump was demanding that the president of ukraine investigate the bidens. question, was there any doubt in your mind as to what the president, our president was asking for as a deliverable? vindman, there was no doubt. he added, quote, the power disparity between the president of the united states and the president of ukraine is vast and you know in the president asking for something it was a demand for him to fulfill this particular prerequisite in order to get the meeting. -- vindman and hill testifying that sondland was talking about how he had an agreement with chief of staff mick mulvaney for a meeting with the ukrainians if they were going to go forward with investigations. investigations into the bidens among other matters. upon hearing about that from fiona hill, that a white house meeting would only come if there
the transcript and was shocked. i sat in an awful lot of calls, she said, and i've not seen anything like this. and hills had been told by sondland that mulvaney skrated the ukrainians would get a meeting with the ukrainians started up the investigations again. hill testified that sondland told this directly to the ukrainians in a july 10th meeting. john bolton, national security adviser at the time suddenly ended the meeting. bolton then told hill to report it to the top nsc lawyer saying i'm not part of whatever drug deal sondland and mulvaney are cooking up. vindman, who is also disturbed by the meeting reported it as well. hill and vindman had both known about the role that rudy giuliani was playing in ukraine, pushing the conspiracy theories and working to get the u.s. ambassador removed. after he was successful, bolton told hill that giuliani was a hand grenade that is going to blow everybody up. hill left the white house in august and said that during her time there and since then she has gotten all kinds of threats
including death threats, called with obscenities to her house and people hammering on her front door. she was called a mole for george sur os which is a common anti-semitic slander and accused of colluding with enemies of the president. jake. >> alex marquardt, thanks so much. let's chew over there. mary katharine, vindman testified that sondland, who is the ambassador to the eu, who was running a point for the white house on ukraine and sondland told him he was coordinating with mick mulvaney on the necessity to launch investigations in order to secure a white house meeting with zelensky and trump. answer, this is vindman. so i heard him say, sondland, this is coordinated with white house chief of staff mr. mick mulvaney. question, what did he say about that? he just said that he had conversation with mr. mulvaney and this is what was required in order to get a white house meeting. question, did he explain what the investigations were that were needed. vindman he talked about the investigations which i guess