incredibly smart and incredibly likable and winsome, and on the stage for a lot of americans to look up to. i'm at the rah, rah, hear, hear side of the debate on the level of what is a supreme court justice's job, that's what a lot of us are trying to get, more than just a methodology. i want to thank you for that answer. you have also brought up the fourth amendment a number of times in our conversation and i would like to talk a little more about the constitution and whether its meaning changes. so i would like to go back to the fourth amendment topic you brought up in my office. up, i think, and correct me if i'm missummarizing your position. you said originalism wouldn't have much to say about the fourth amendment because the founding fathers never conceived of a tool, a piece of telecommunications equipment like this. so i think during our conversation you said that the original meaning of the fourth amendment won't tell you what to