Jews that rejects liberalism. The reformed jew, the secular republican was noted all. Modern levels of is the antithesis of duty as a liberalism is the antithesis of judaism. A was the first time we had just guide that expected us to be just people. Us to beat expected just people. The punishment shall not exceed the crime. Justice,dont want which is why they assert that insert a modifier before the word. It is something they do over and sure wein to make support the opposite. Truth matters. It is important to be correct, but not when your liver. You are a liberal. They entered the modifier politically before correct and become the opposite. Women who are the majority are the minority because they put the modifier of breast oppressed. Jews are not a minority, social justice is the opposite of justice. The more jewish you are by knowledge, practice, and education with the more less likely you are to vote democrat because democrats despise the concept of justice. [applause] before i get to the next question, i guess you and i are both whopping jews that vote republican. We are an elite group. Beckis your view on glenn and his efforts to bring truth to journalism . He made a very big mistake in my eyes, which is charging. I really dont watch a lot of ienn beck, god bless and, think we have to come from different directions. I think this is an ideological war, thank goodness it has not been violent for the most part, but it has always been from the left when we have had violence. Al sharpton, no justice, no peace. Give me what i want, we will bring violence. Era, it isliberal always been from the left. This is an ideological war, and we need every weapon, which is why got back into standup comity. Comedy. I was a screenplay writer, but after 9 11 when i said my liberal friends say we deserve these attacks, that it was the chickens coming home to roost, that we were all little i have to fight this war. I had to find the weapon we were missing. A bill more from the white from the right, and that is what i going to do. [applause] the prostitutes on my arms. [laughter] have you been able to convert any of your liberal friends or relatives . Many, many, many. [applause] and here is how you do it. Except for the fact that my poison starting to go, and i do not know what your rules are, i am willing to answer questions about because as a conservative in the bay area, i have nowhere else to go. [laughter] i have a program that i call adopt a democrat. Isause the and good news that america is not divided in two, we are divided in three. There are those of us who get it, that right and wrong, good and evil, better and worse, ugly and beautiful exist. We seek to conserve those things that are beautiful, good, wonderful, most especially in this room tonight, the exceptional United States of america. [applause] and so we seek to conserve this can and that is why we call ourselves conservatives. All the way on the other side are people like my friend rosie odonnell, about whom there is nothing you can do anything about. She is a, a troubled idiot. This is how she gets out her anger, and thinks that she is smart. Remind me what im talking about, eventually. Cspan, do you have enough battery life . The two questions i always get you liberal are jews liberal, and what happened to build more bill marr . He was not this sick, radical, leftwing hate job that he is now. Bill has not changed one whit. Bill was never a libertarian, hes not a liberal can be that a modern liberal, he is not a leftwing fanatic for he is a sick narcissist. Needs strangers to tell him how great he is. When we did the show out of new york city, out of the show you walk down or take the elevator down, and you walk to where youre going. Passastore men you drivers,cap construction workers. You have to appeal with people with jobs. To lose show moved out angeles and hollywood, you leave the studio could we get in your car, the eight goes up, there taxidrivers,n, people of the bus stop who do not understand what youre saying. You keep driving until you get to your gated community. Who is there to tell you that you love you . Susan sarandon, alec baldwin, the other hollywood superstars. Allid not change at all, that changed was the city from which the show was being done. Left,ve the people on the but there is somebody that i believe i believe that the vast majority of people who vote democrat do not hate america. They have been lied to, my friend and shapiro makes a great point. Both campaigns accomplished what they wanted to accomplish. Trademney campaign were obama as a good and decent family man who happens to be stunningly incompetent, and the Obama Campaign portrayed romney as a dog waiting, woman hating, homosexual hating men, who used cancer for more money. Dont know a Single Person who votes democrat. Gonow lots of people who against republicans. The leftcannot honestly protect and defend, that is why objectivity is undesirable. If you are raised to believe that it is a hate crime to think, everything we do is racist. What you need to find is a whole bunch of the middle, the people who have neverat heard from a conservative what a conservative believes. Where would they have heard it . Cbs . Or nbc . The New York Times . Or the Washington Post . Thee are three mediums that liberal hates. Fox news, conservative talk radio, and the blogosphere. Truth. Org, you should look into them. Fox news is only 15 years old. If your friends are my age, that ns they were 38 the court before there was a single Television News program that did not advance leftism. Tie conservative talk leg radio to rush limbaugh, that was 20 years ago. Already old by dr. Nation and education, well into my family news talk radio and fox and the bloggers here sphere, 2004 when they caught dan rather using forged documents. But as the first time they have been caught. You can find somebody in your life who you know is naughty braindead radical leftist. If you have one in your family, just love them. Top talk about the weather, but then there is global warming, so [laughter] one more question. Important that it be somebody in your life. What they do is they dismiss us as not not see, fascist, and raises, which they cannot do if youre their brother. Time, dont take every fight, do not take every story, do not pick every issue. Most of the time of his talk sports or whatever, but when they Say Something particularly moronic, like that guy should not have made that video, you take the opportunity to lay out the facts. It is like adopting a child. Every once in a while, but then win. Let thenm write, i write i and my friend bought coffee shop i write at my Friends Coffee shop. I put out an and coulter book, just to bug him. It became harder for him to dismiss me that the caricature that the media portrayed. If you can change just one person, we double our numbers. How does the Mainstream Media get away with sustained professional malpractice . Why do people keep buying their product . First of all, they are not. The New York Times had to sell their building, and then use that money to pay rent on their building. Ratings are dwindling everywhere but fox. Cnns numbers are the lowest in 20 years. Interesting i know this about hollywood, money is not the primary concern. To the owner of the New York Times, who inherited his fortune when did nothing to earn it. He really doesnt care, he will always have enough money. He would rather that they go down in flames than tell the truth. Thank you so much. Dont forget to buy my book. [applause] on this celebration of the Martin Luther king holiday today here in washington dc, and live picture of the king memorial. Theres been a steady stream of visitors posing for pictures, reading the descriptions on the statue. Tall, and is 30 feet by comparison, the statue of lincoln in then Lincoln Memorial is 19 feet tall. The address for the memorial has the sole special significance, it is the street and success address for the 1954 civil rights act. As we continue to watch the scene here we are covering several events today relating to the king holiday. Today president obama and the first family are taking part in a Service Project in the d c area. We will record that of have that for you later today. Withakfast this morning speeches by Vice President joe biden, all of that coming up later on cspan. Earlier this morning at the site of the moro memorial, the degraded rna wreathlaying ceremony in honor of dr. Kings legacy. Here is a look. We are going to have the reverend say a prayer force commander we are going to encourage everyone to go out and do your day of service. Thank you for joining us. Were would have one more song by the choir. Then the reverend will dismiss us. We appreciate all of our guests who came out for the program. Thank you for joining us. Let us bow our heads. God, we give you thanks for the light, legacy, and memory of this great profit. Prophet. We lay this wreath in celebration of what he has done. We go forward from this life, assuming our own responsibilities, to see what the end will be. Amen. Amen. Rocking my soul in the bosom of abraham. Rocking my soul in the bosom of abraham. Rocking my soul in the bosom of abraham. Oh, rocking my soul. The Associated Press reporting today congressman James Lankford of oklahoma announcing he will seek the retiring Senators Senate seat. Runtwoterm republican who ran unopposed will join other potential candidates. Know, truthfully, that every single problem in america would be better if more people could read, write, and comprehend. I just know that. We would be able to compete with the rest of the world. We would not have these children who are committing crimes because their families do not have jobs. They do not have jobs because they cannot read, they cannot write, they do not understand. I think every thinking american is coming to that conclusion. We have got to educate our children, and we have to educate their parents. It is at just a whim, necessity if we are going to compete in this world. Tonight lady arbor but, on cspan, cn, span3, cspan radio, and c span. Org. Stephen breyer said it is not a matter of if, but when cameras will be allowed in the port court. He was speaking at the Washington Center for internships and economic hours andeven academic seminars. Hour. S just over an [applause] my pleasure to be here. Youre going to talk about congress, and the branch of government that works. [laughter] this is flattery. Let me start out by asking what you did today. Theyrikes me as unusual, had a challenge to the president s resource recessed power. This is something that the Supreme Court has never had to think about before. Here we are 200 plus years into our nations history. Is it surprising that there are still nooks and crannies of constitution that comes before the Supreme Court . It is not surprising. Pick, it isne to unusual for a father. [laughter] kennedy,for senator and i love doing that, so i am delighted that the school and the Kennedy Institute are together, on a project that would have been dear to his heart. Youre here because you are already successes, and youre interesting in how Government Works, and youre willing to learn about it. From our point of view, this is allocation ofht time because the decisions about the United States are not made in the courts. Are there parts of the constitution that we have never considered before, yes. About two only been in history that have been experts on the tonnage clause. You have to understand that the courts are not really there to interpret the law, they do interpret the law, but the reason that the courts are there are because people get into arguments. There are billions and billions of arguments, almost all of them settled. Youro not get too angry at friends are going to sit for too long. You work it out. Senator kennedy used to tell his staff to go work it out to that is an attitude that we found, but that is what the courts are therefore, when you cannot do that. No country would work if it were that 99. 9 of all disagree with or worked out. If there about money, family, or whatever, you go to a lawyer. The lawyer is supposed to work it out. The usually do, but not always. If they cannot, they are in court, and the court gets settlements, a huge number of them. , if they still cannot work it out if they still cannot work it out, maybe they will have a trial, and some appeals. Of those billions of argument, some will come to us to settle. Despite thet disagreement of what the correct answer is to this question, they have worked it out. Now they have raised a way of working out. You get the hard cases. You will see this. Jefferson may have said one thing, hamilton another thing, they may have had an attorney general for the president. Several president s have said another thing, Congress Said the opposite. Thisors of all parties, morning you get more from one party, and when this president was of a different party, you thethe same things from senators of the opposite party. People switched sides. The critical issue at the moment is that they found an area that is concrete, definite, and they can disagree about it. Were these reticular particular appointments proper . What does this mean . What does may have been mean . Argued, there are all kinds of complexities, and eventually we had to decide. When youre looking at the closer to should provide to answer a question like this at the constitution, to answer a question like this, the lower courts have provided an opinion too. Would you have to decide a purpose of a provision in the constitution, which you will have to do in this case, how do you know what the Founding Fathers had in mind . That is a good question. Let me show you something that is true of the constitution, and also of an ordinary statute. You have some words. The question is how do those words apply . How shall they be interpreted . How do we apply them in this case or that . Extreme, i opposite can give you an example that has nothing to do with the law. I discovered in france a new story. News edit said there was a High School Teacher on a training he was carrying, in a basket, 20 live snails. He taught biology, and he was going to show them to the class. It was not his lunch. The conductor said you had to i a ticket for the snails, and he said what . And it says read what the tariff says. A one may bring animals and basket, or they have to buy ticket. They were talking about cats and dogs. They were talking about animals. Is a snail in animal . Oh. Whether youre talking about the appointments clause, when you talk about the freedom of speech, which is not explain itself, whether high or low, whether detailed or not, virtually every judge almost always uses the same asic tools to try to find the answer to a difficult question. One, you read the text. If it says animal, one thing we know for certain is it is not a carrot because the carrot is not an error and will an animal, no matter what. The text whats on put on limits. They do look at the history, where did this phrase come from of what was the history of the statute . Third, you look at tradition. Suppose a sense of the about habeas corpus. There is a tradition that surrounds those words. Fourth, you look at the precedent, there are earlier cases that have some relevance. Somebody had an edit active in putting that word in an tive in putting that word in the statute. What was the purpose . Of, look at consequences deciding one way or another in the site in the light of the purpose. If you are looking at the First Amendment, that is the cobwebs of speech. The Fourth Amendment is consequent as of privacy. All judges use posix tools, but judges very in the emphasis that the give one or the other. Torobably give more weight the purpose and the consequence. My fellow judge would take into t the history, and i would give the language. The tradition, the president precedent, that is the same with this case today. That is why people do i look at history . Look at the Second Amendment. Guns. Ithe basic purpose could not figure out the basic turbos, without looking at history. We got into a detailed discussion, and they will look into more history than i am willing to. This was the Supreme Court decision in 2008. For the first time in our nation history, the Supreme Court said what the Second Amendment means. You talk about history, the court is divided 54, so history does not always provide the answer . Courte judges on our thought that the Second Amendment but which says a well regulated militia being necessary for the security of a free state about right of the people to bear arms shall not be infringed. Heres what it is about. The they passed constitution, madison and hamilton, they wanted that document, which they knew was a good one, to be ratified. But there were people around causing trouble. It was a close question. One of the arguments that they raised was that we have just. Ought a war of independence state militias were part of the revolutionary army. Thefirst article to constitution says that congress can call up the state militias and regulate them. How do we know that congress will not do it and destroy the state militias . Fear not, said madison and hamilton, we will pass a bill of rights, the Second Amendment will stop congress from calling them up. If that is what this is about, it is a great historical interest, very little practical fell you value. It was atrophic argument, but argument, butific only for people accepted it. People believed that it was about the people, in both cases we are looking at history. When you apply, you still have to apply it in light of her process, in light of what is going to be the practical result, and what the content of that Second Amendment is. Very open, it is not in decided by our court. Sometimes you have to fill in